皮肤过敏风险评估-综合化学环境(SARA-ICE)定义了得出皮肤致敏点的方法。

IF 2.9 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Current Research in Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-12-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100205
Emily N Reinke, Joe Reynolds, Nicola Gilmour, Georgia Reynolds, Judy Strickland, Dori Germolec, David G Allen, Gavin Maxwell, Nicole C Kleinstreuer
{"title":"皮肤过敏风险评估-综合化学环境(SARA-ICE)定义了得出皮肤致敏点的方法。","authors":"Emily N Reinke, Joe Reynolds, Nicola Gilmour, Georgia Reynolds, Judy Strickland, Dori Germolec, David G Allen, Gavin Maxwell, Nicole C Kleinstreuer","doi":"10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanistically based non-animal methods for assessing skin sensitization hazard have been developed, but are not considered sufficient, individually, to conclusively define the skin sensitization potential or potency of a chemical. This resulted in the development of defined approaches (DAs), as documented in OECD TG 497, for combining information sources in a prescriptive manner to provide a determination of risk or potency. However, there are currently no DAs within OECD TG 497 that can derive a point of departure (POD) for risk assessment. The Skin Allergy Risk Assessment - Integrated Chemical Environment (SARA-ICE) DA for skin sensitization is a Bayesian statistical model that estimates a human-relevant metric of sensitizer potency, the ED<sub>01</sub>, an estimate of the human predictive patch test dermal dose at which there is 1% chance of inducing sensitization, which can be used in a risk assessment paradigm. The model accounts for variability of input data and explicitly quantifies uncertainty. SARA-ICE derives the ED<sub>01</sub> from a variety of <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> test method data and is built upon historical human, murine, and <i>in vitro</i> test data for 434 chemicals. In addition to the ED<sub>01</sub> POD SARA-ICE DA also provides a Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) classification probability for GHS subcategories 1A, 1B and not classified (NC). Here we describe the SARA-ICE model and its evaluation, including performance versus benchmark PODs. In addition, via a case study with isothiazolinones (ITs), we demonstrate the utility of SARA-ICE for integrating different data inputs and compare the ED<sub>01</sub> for six ITs to existing historical data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11236,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Toxicology","volume":"8 ","pages":"100205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11719337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The skin allergy risk assessment-integrated chemical environment (SARA-ICE) defined approach to derive points of departure for skin sensitization.\",\"authors\":\"Emily N Reinke, Joe Reynolds, Nicola Gilmour, Georgia Reynolds, Judy Strickland, Dori Germolec, David G Allen, Gavin Maxwell, Nicole C Kleinstreuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mechanistically based non-animal methods for assessing skin sensitization hazard have been developed, but are not considered sufficient, individually, to conclusively define the skin sensitization potential or potency of a chemical. This resulted in the development of defined approaches (DAs), as documented in OECD TG 497, for combining information sources in a prescriptive manner to provide a determination of risk or potency. However, there are currently no DAs within OECD TG 497 that can derive a point of departure (POD) for risk assessment. The Skin Allergy Risk Assessment - Integrated Chemical Environment (SARA-ICE) DA for skin sensitization is a Bayesian statistical model that estimates a human-relevant metric of sensitizer potency, the ED<sub>01</sub>, an estimate of the human predictive patch test dermal dose at which there is 1% chance of inducing sensitization, which can be used in a risk assessment paradigm. The model accounts for variability of input data and explicitly quantifies uncertainty. SARA-ICE derives the ED<sub>01</sub> from a variety of <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> test method data and is built upon historical human, murine, and <i>in vitro</i> test data for 434 chemicals. In addition to the ED<sub>01</sub> POD SARA-ICE DA also provides a Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) classification probability for GHS subcategories 1A, 1B and not classified (NC). Here we describe the SARA-ICE model and its evaluation, including performance versus benchmark PODs. In addition, via a case study with isothiazolinones (ITs), we demonstrate the utility of SARA-ICE for integrating different data inputs and compare the ED<sub>01</sub> for six ITs to existing historical data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"100205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11719337/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经开发了基于机械的非动物方法来评估皮肤致敏危害,但被认为不足以单独确定化学物质的皮肤致敏潜力或效力。这导致了定义方法(DAs)的发展,如经合组织TG 497中所记载的那样,以规定的方式将信息来源结合起来,以确定风险或效力。然而,目前经合组织TG 497中没有DAs可以得出一个出发点(POD)进行风险评估。皮肤过敏风险评估-综合化学环境(SARA-ICE) DA是一个贝叶斯统计模型,用于估计与人类相关的致敏剂效力度量,ED01,人类预测贴片试验皮肤剂量的估计值,有1%的机会诱导致敏,可用于风险评估范例。该模型考虑了输入数据的可变性,并明确量化了不确定性。SARA-ICE从各种体外和体内测试方法数据中提取ED01,并建立在434种化学物质的历史人类,小鼠和体外测试数据之上。除了ED01 POD之外,SARA-ICE DA还提供了GHS子类别1A, 1B和未分类(NC)的全球统一化学品分类和标签系统(GHS)分类概率。在这里,我们将描述SARA-ICE模型及其评估,包括性能与基准pod的对比。此外,通过异噻唑啉酮(ITs)的案例研究,我们展示了SARA-ICE在整合不同数据输入方面的效用,并将六个ITs的ED01与现有历史数据进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The skin allergy risk assessment-integrated chemical environment (SARA-ICE) defined approach to derive points of departure for skin sensitization.

Mechanistically based non-animal methods for assessing skin sensitization hazard have been developed, but are not considered sufficient, individually, to conclusively define the skin sensitization potential or potency of a chemical. This resulted in the development of defined approaches (DAs), as documented in OECD TG 497, for combining information sources in a prescriptive manner to provide a determination of risk or potency. However, there are currently no DAs within OECD TG 497 that can derive a point of departure (POD) for risk assessment. The Skin Allergy Risk Assessment - Integrated Chemical Environment (SARA-ICE) DA for skin sensitization is a Bayesian statistical model that estimates a human-relevant metric of sensitizer potency, the ED01, an estimate of the human predictive patch test dermal dose at which there is 1% chance of inducing sensitization, which can be used in a risk assessment paradigm. The model accounts for variability of input data and explicitly quantifies uncertainty. SARA-ICE derives the ED01 from a variety of in vitro and in vivo test method data and is built upon historical human, murine, and in vitro test data for 434 chemicals. In addition to the ED01 POD SARA-ICE DA also provides a Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) classification probability for GHS subcategories 1A, 1B and not classified (NC). Here we describe the SARA-ICE model and its evaluation, including performance versus benchmark PODs. In addition, via a case study with isothiazolinones (ITs), we demonstrate the utility of SARA-ICE for integrating different data inputs and compare the ED01 for six ITs to existing historical data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Toxicology
Current Research in Toxicology Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信