≥70% TBSA烧伤患者首次切向切除的最佳时机和方法:来自大规模伤亡事件回顾性队列的见解。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Runzhi Huang, Yuntao Yao, Sujie Xie, Junqiang Li, Wei Zhang, Yifan Liu, Shuyuan Xian, Hanlin Sun, Guosheng Wu, Heng He, Linhui Li, Xinru Wu, Yuanan Li, Haoyu Zhang, Bingnan Lu, Jiajie Zhou, Yibin Zhou, Dayuan Xu, Zhaofan Xia, Shizhao Ji
{"title":"≥70% TBSA烧伤患者首次切向切除的最佳时机和方法:来自大规模伤亡事件回顾性队列的见解。","authors":"Runzhi Huang, Yuntao Yao, Sujie Xie, Junqiang Li, Wei Zhang, Yifan Liu, Shuyuan Xian, Hanlin Sun, Guosheng Wu, Heng He, Linhui Li, Xinru Wu, Yuanan Li, Haoyu Zhang, Bingnan Lu, Jiajie Zhou, Yibin Zhou, Dayuan Xu, Zhaofan Xia, Shizhao Ji","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to determine the optimal timing and approaches for first tangential excision of severely burned patients ≥70% total body surface area (TBSA).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Early tangential excision is the gold-standard surgical therapy for full-thickness burns. However, there are debates about its optimal timing and approaches for severely burned patients ≥70%TBSA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 185 patients in the Kunshan factory explosion. We focused on surgical timing, surgical area, and main wound covering method for first tangential excision. We determined the optimal cut-off values for surgical timing and area using R language \"surv_cutpoint\" and \"surv_categorize\" functions, and utilized the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to investigate their influences on patients' overall survival. Then, we utilized multi-variate Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors, and performed subgroup analyses to find confounding factors. Finally, we employed a 10-year single-center cohort of 144 patients with burn injury ≥70% TBSA for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performing first tangential excision in >3 days (hazard ratio=2.37, 95% confidence interval=1.05-5.40, P =0.039) and surgical area > 48% TBSA (hazard ratio=2.41, 95% confidence interval=1.46-4.00, P <0.001) were independent risk factors in the Kunshan cohort for overall survival of patients ≥70% TBSA, and were associated with higher rate of complications. Subgroup analysis revealed that the timing and TBSA of first tangential excision were influenced by several treatment and complications factors (hemodynamic status and types of hospitals). Main wound covering methods was a significant confounding factor. Patients with more autograft showed better overall survival than those with more extensive use of temporary skin substitutes in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis ( P <0.001). However, main wound covering methods influenced by the severity of injury, availability of autologous skin source, as well as the medical resources. Additionally, external validation demonstrated consistent results and acceptable calibration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified the optimal timing and approaches for first tangential excision, validating them as independent prognostic factors for patients with ≥70% TBSA. However, considering the various confounding factors, treatment for each patient should be tailored.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Timing and Approaches for First Tangential Excision in Patients with ≥70% TBSA Burns: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort of a Mass Casualty Incident.\",\"authors\":\"Runzhi Huang, Yuntao Yao, Sujie Xie, Junqiang Li, Wei Zhang, Yifan Liu, Shuyuan Xian, Hanlin Sun, Guosheng Wu, Heng He, Linhui Li, Xinru Wu, Yuanan Li, Haoyu Zhang, Bingnan Lu, Jiajie Zhou, Yibin Zhou, Dayuan Xu, Zhaofan Xia, Shizhao Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to determine the optimal timing and approaches for first tangential excision of severely burned patients ≥70% total body surface area (TBSA).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Early tangential excision is the gold-standard surgical therapy for full-thickness burns. However, there are debates about its optimal timing and approaches for severely burned patients ≥70%TBSA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 185 patients in the Kunshan factory explosion. We focused on surgical timing, surgical area, and main wound covering method for first tangential excision. We determined the optimal cut-off values for surgical timing and area using R language \\\"surv_cutpoint\\\" and \\\"surv_categorize\\\" functions, and utilized the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to investigate their influences on patients' overall survival. Then, we utilized multi-variate Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors, and performed subgroup analyses to find confounding factors. Finally, we employed a 10-year single-center cohort of 144 patients with burn injury ≥70% TBSA for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performing first tangential excision in >3 days (hazard ratio=2.37, 95% confidence interval=1.05-5.40, P =0.039) and surgical area > 48% TBSA (hazard ratio=2.41, 95% confidence interval=1.46-4.00, P <0.001) were independent risk factors in the Kunshan cohort for overall survival of patients ≥70% TBSA, and were associated with higher rate of complications. Subgroup analysis revealed that the timing and TBSA of first tangential excision were influenced by several treatment and complications factors (hemodynamic status and types of hospitals). Main wound covering methods was a significant confounding factor. Patients with more autograft showed better overall survival than those with more extensive use of temporary skin substitutes in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis ( P <0.001). However, main wound covering methods influenced by the severity of injury, availability of autologous skin source, as well as the medical resources. Additionally, external validation demonstrated consistent results and acceptable calibration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified the optimal timing and approaches for first tangential excision, validating them as independent prognostic factors for patients with ≥70% TBSA. However, considering the various confounding factors, treatment for each patient should be tailored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006626\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨≥70%体表面积(TBSA)的严重烧伤患者首次切向切除的最佳时机和方法。背景:早期切向切除是全层烧伤的金标准手术治疗方法。然而,对于≥70%TBSA的严重烧伤患者,其最佳时机和方法存在争议。材料与方法:以昆山工厂爆炸事故185例患者为研究对象。我们着重于首次切向切除的手术时机、手术面积和主要创面覆盖方法。我们使用R语言“surv_cutpoint”和“surv_categorize”函数确定手术时间和面积的最佳截断值,并利用Kaplan-Meier生存分析来研究它们对患者总生存的影响。然后,我们利用多变量Cox回归分析找出独立因素,并进行亚组分析找出混杂因素。最后,我们采用了一项为期10年的单中心队列研究,共144例TBSA≥70%的烧伤患者进行外部验证。结果:首次切向切除时间为>3天(风险比=2.37,95%可信区间=1.05-5.40,P =0.039),手术面积>为48% TBSA(风险比=2.41,95%可信区间=1.46-4.00,P)。结论:本研究确定了首次切向切除的最佳时机和方法,验证了它们是TBSA≥70%患者的独立预后因素。然而,考虑到各种混杂因素,应该为每位患者量身定制治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Timing and Approaches for First Tangential Excision in Patients with ≥70% TBSA Burns: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort of a Mass Casualty Incident.

Objective: We aim to determine the optimal timing and approaches for first tangential excision of severely burned patients ≥70% total body surface area (TBSA).

Background: Early tangential excision is the gold-standard surgical therapy for full-thickness burns. However, there are debates about its optimal timing and approaches for severely burned patients ≥70%TBSA.

Materials and methods: This study included 185 patients in the Kunshan factory explosion. We focused on surgical timing, surgical area, and main wound covering method for first tangential excision. We determined the optimal cut-off values for surgical timing and area using R language "surv_cutpoint" and "surv_categorize" functions, and utilized the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to investigate their influences on patients' overall survival. Then, we utilized multi-variate Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors, and performed subgroup analyses to find confounding factors. Finally, we employed a 10-year single-center cohort of 144 patients with burn injury ≥70% TBSA for external validation.

Results: Performing first tangential excision in >3 days (hazard ratio=2.37, 95% confidence interval=1.05-5.40, P =0.039) and surgical area > 48% TBSA (hazard ratio=2.41, 95% confidence interval=1.46-4.00, P <0.001) were independent risk factors in the Kunshan cohort for overall survival of patients ≥70% TBSA, and were associated with higher rate of complications. Subgroup analysis revealed that the timing and TBSA of first tangential excision were influenced by several treatment and complications factors (hemodynamic status and types of hospitals). Main wound covering methods was a significant confounding factor. Patients with more autograft showed better overall survival than those with more extensive use of temporary skin substitutes in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis ( P <0.001). However, main wound covering methods influenced by the severity of injury, availability of autologous skin source, as well as the medical resources. Additionally, external validation demonstrated consistent results and acceptable calibration.

Conclusion: This study identified the optimal timing and approaches for first tangential excision, validating them as independent prognostic factors for patients with ≥70% TBSA. However, considering the various confounding factors, treatment for each patient should be tailored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信