胃癌肝转移患者免疫治疗的疗效及影响因素分析

T T Lu, Y H Gao, G Zhang, H Y Zhang, Y Liu, Z D Chen, H Q Xi
{"title":"胃癌肝转移患者免疫治疗的疗效及影响因素分析","authors":"T T Lu, Y H Gao, G Zhang, H Y Zhang, Y Liu, Z D Chen, H Q Xi","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240612-00292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the efficacy and factors affecting the treatment of gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study. Clinical and pathological data of 588 patients with GCLM treated at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. There were 491 males and 97 females, aged (<i>M</i>(IQR)) 60(14) years (range: 18 to 86 years). Patients were divided into an ICI treatment group (<i>n</i>=142) and a non-ICI treatment group (<i>n</i>=446) based on whether they received ICI therapy. Clinical and pathological data between the two groups were compared using the <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test or Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with cT stage, cN stage, surgical treatment, targeted therapy, and biomarkers as covariates, using a 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method with a caliper value of 0.2. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models, with relevant variables selected through forward stepwise regression. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and group differences were compared using the Log-rank test. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify potential beneficiary populations for ICI through forest plots. <b>Results:</b> After PSM, 114 patients were included in each group, and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The results of Cox multivariate analysis after PSM showed that cN2-3 stage (<i>HR</i>=1.348, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.091 to 1.665, <i>P</i>=0.006) and peritoneal metastasis (<i>HR</i>=1.877, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.360 to 2.590, <i>P</i><0.01) were independent risk factors for survival in GCLM patients; radical surgery (<i>HR</i>=0.391, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.305 to 0.501, <i>P</i><0.01), immunotherapy (<i>HR</i>=0.630, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.503 to 0.788, <i>P</i><0.01), and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or combined positive score (CPS)≥5 (<i>HR</i>=0.454, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.320 to 0.644, <i>P</i><0.01) were independent protective factors for survival in GCLM patients. After PSM, the overall survival was 12.4 (13.0) months in the non-immunotherapy group and 17.6 (17.8) months in the immunotherapy group (Log-rank test:<i>P</i>=0.029). Subgroup analysis showed that female patients, those with primary tumors located in the upper stomach, cN2-3 stage, one liver metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, receiving targeted therapy, and those with dMMR or CPS≥5 were more likely to benefit from ICI therapy (all <i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> ICI prolongs overall survival in GCLM patients. Female patients, those with primary tumors located in the upper stomach, cN2-3 stage, one liver metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, receiving targeted therapy, and those with dMMR or CPS≥5 are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":60685,"journal":{"name":"中华外科杂志","volume":"63 2","pages":"136-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy in gastric cancer liver metastasic patients].\",\"authors\":\"T T Lu, Y H Gao, G Zhang, H Y Zhang, Y Liu, Z D Chen, H Q Xi\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240612-00292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the efficacy and factors affecting the treatment of gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). <b>Methods:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study. Clinical and pathological data of 588 patients with GCLM treated at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. There were 491 males and 97 females, aged (<i>M</i>(IQR)) 60(14) years (range: 18 to 86 years). Patients were divided into an ICI treatment group (<i>n</i>=142) and a non-ICI treatment group (<i>n</i>=446) based on whether they received ICI therapy. Clinical and pathological data between the two groups were compared using the <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> test or Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with cT stage, cN stage, surgical treatment, targeted therapy, and biomarkers as covariates, using a 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method with a caliper value of 0.2. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models, with relevant variables selected through forward stepwise regression. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and group differences were compared using the Log-rank test. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify potential beneficiary populations for ICI through forest plots. <b>Results:</b> After PSM, 114 patients were included in each group, and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The results of Cox multivariate analysis after PSM showed that cN2-3 stage (<i>HR</i>=1.348, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.091 to 1.665, <i>P</i>=0.006) and peritoneal metastasis (<i>HR</i>=1.877, 95%<i>CI</i>:1.360 to 2.590, <i>P</i><0.01) were independent risk factors for survival in GCLM patients; radical surgery (<i>HR</i>=0.391, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.305 to 0.501, <i>P</i><0.01), immunotherapy (<i>HR</i>=0.630, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.503 to 0.788, <i>P</i><0.01), and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or combined positive score (CPS)≥5 (<i>HR</i>=0.454, 95%<i>CI</i>: 0.320 to 0.644, <i>P</i><0.01) were independent protective factors for survival in GCLM patients. After PSM, the overall survival was 12.4 (13.0) months in the non-immunotherapy group and 17.6 (17.8) months in the immunotherapy group (Log-rank test:<i>P</i>=0.029). Subgroup analysis showed that female patients, those with primary tumors located in the upper stomach, cN2-3 stage, one liver metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, receiving targeted therapy, and those with dMMR or CPS≥5 were more likely to benefit from ICI therapy (all <i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> ICI prolongs overall survival in GCLM patients. Female patients, those with primary tumors located in the upper stomach, cN2-3 stage, one liver metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, receiving targeted therapy, and those with dMMR or CPS≥5 are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":60685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"136-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240612-00292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240612-00292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗胃癌肝转移(GCLM)的疗效及影响因素。方法:回顾性队列研究。回顾性收集2018年1月至2022年12月在中国人民解放军总医院第一医疗中心普外科治疗的588例GCLM患者的临床和病理资料。男性491例,女性97例,年龄(M(IQR)) 60(14)岁,年龄范围:18 ~ 86岁。根据是否接受过ICI治疗,将患者分为ICI治疗组(n=142)和非ICI治疗组(n=446)。两组临床及病理资料比较采用χ2检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。以cT分期、cN分期、手术治疗、靶向治疗、生物标志物为协变量,采用1∶1最近邻匹配法,卡尺值为0.2进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行单因素和多因素分析,通过正向逐步回归选择相关变量。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用Log-rank检验比较组间差异。进行亚组分析,通过森林样地确定ICI的潜在受益人群。结果:PSM后,两组各纳入114例患者,两组基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。PSM术后Cox多因素分析结果显示,cN2-3期(HR=1.348, 95%CI: 1.091 ~ 1.665, P=0.006)和腹膜转移(HR=1.877, 95%CI:1.360 ~ 2.590, PHR=0.391, 95%CI: 0.305 ~ 0.501, PHR=0.630, 95%CI: 0.503 ~ 0.788, PHR=0.454, 95%CI: 0.320 ~ 0.644, PP=0.029)。亚组分析显示,女性患者、原发肿瘤位于上胃、cN2-3期、一次肝转移、同步肝转移、接受靶向治疗的患者、dMMR或CPS≥5的患者更有可能从ICI治疗中获益(均p结论:ICI延长GCLM患者的总生存期。女性患者、原发肿瘤位于上胃、cN2-3期、一次肝转移、同步肝转移、接受靶向治疗以及dMMR或CPS≥5的患者更有可能从ICI治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy in gastric cancer liver metastasic patients].

Objective: To explore the efficacy and factors affecting the treatment of gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Clinical and pathological data of 588 patients with GCLM treated at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, People's Liberation Army General Hospital, from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. There were 491 males and 97 females, aged (M(IQR)) 60(14) years (range: 18 to 86 years). Patients were divided into an ICI treatment group (n=142) and a non-ICI treatment group (n=446) based on whether they received ICI therapy. Clinical and pathological data between the two groups were compared using the χ2 test or Mann-Whitney U test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed with cT stage, cN stage, surgical treatment, targeted therapy, and biomarkers as covariates, using a 1∶1 nearest neighbor matching method with a caliper value of 0.2. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models, with relevant variables selected through forward stepwise regression. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and group differences were compared using the Log-rank test. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify potential beneficiary populations for ICI through forest plots. Results: After PSM, 114 patients were included in each group, and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). The results of Cox multivariate analysis after PSM showed that cN2-3 stage (HR=1.348, 95%CI: 1.091 to 1.665, P=0.006) and peritoneal metastasis (HR=1.877, 95%CI:1.360 to 2.590, P<0.01) were independent risk factors for survival in GCLM patients; radical surgery (HR=0.391, 95%CI: 0.305 to 0.501, P<0.01), immunotherapy (HR=0.630, 95%CI: 0.503 to 0.788, P<0.01), and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or combined positive score (CPS)≥5 (HR=0.454, 95%CI: 0.320 to 0.644, P<0.01) were independent protective factors for survival in GCLM patients. After PSM, the overall survival was 12.4 (13.0) months in the non-immunotherapy group and 17.6 (17.8) months in the immunotherapy group (Log-rank test:P=0.029). Subgroup analysis showed that female patients, those with primary tumors located in the upper stomach, cN2-3 stage, one liver metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, receiving targeted therapy, and those with dMMR or CPS≥5 were more likely to benefit from ICI therapy (all P<0.05). Conclusions: ICI prolongs overall survival in GCLM patients. Female patients, those with primary tumors located in the upper stomach, cN2-3 stage, one liver metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, receiving targeted therapy, and those with dMMR or CPS≥5 are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20861
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg (monthly) is a high-level medical science and technology journal approved by the General Administration of Press and Publication of the People's Republic of China, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology, and organised by the Chinese Medical Association for domestic and international public circulation. It was founded in January 1951, and is published on the basis of the Journal of Chinese Surgery. The Journal is aimed at senior and intermediate surgeons and related researchers, mainly reporting the leading scientific research results and clinical experience in the field of surgery, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding effect on the clinical work of surgery. Chinese Journal of Surgery|Chin J Surg is committed to reflecting the major research progress in the field of surgery in China and promoting academic exchanges at home and abroad. The main columns include thesis, meta-analysis, review, expert forum, synthesis, case report, diagnosis and treatment experience, technical exchange, clinical case discussion, academic controversy, and special lectures, etc. The journal has been accepted by the National Academy of Medicine of the United States. The journal has been included in many famous databases at home and abroad, such as the Biomedical Analysis and Online Retrieval System (MEDLINE) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信