新加坡预先护理计划参与调查的验证。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gwendoline Wan Hua Tan, Ginny Si Min Quek, Nathaniel Jun Xian Lum, Lian Leng Low, Yu Xian Loo
{"title":"新加坡预先护理计划参与调查的验证。","authors":"Gwendoline Wan Hua Tan, Ginny Si Min Quek, Nathaniel Jun Xian Lum, Lian Leng Low, Yu Xian Loo","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01640-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Singapore has an ageing population. End-of-life care and advance care planning are becoming increasingly important. To assess advance care planning engagement, valid tools are required. The primary objective of the study is to validate the 15-, 9- and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 inpatients in a Singapore community hospital were purposively sampled for a cognitive debriefing interview on the ACP Engagement Survey. We recruited patients 21 years and older, who were able to understand and speak English, without a diagnosis of dementia, and who were not admitted under the palliative care service. Next, 150 inpatients and caregivers were recruited using convenience sampling across 2 Singapore community hospitals to complete the 15-item ACP Engagement Survey. We assessed content validity, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha, construct validity with hypotheses testing and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ACPES scores were significantly higher for those who reported yes for pre-planning activities such as making a will, making a lasting power of attorney, telling one's doctor about end-of-life care preferences, and telling family or loved ones about end-of-life care preferences. Cronbach's alpha was 0.945 for the 15-item version, 0.915 for the 9-item version, and 0.912 for the 4-item version. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.933 for the 15-item version, 0.938 for the 9-item version and 0.865 for the 4-item version.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided good psychometric support for the validity of the 15-item, 9-item and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB) approved this study (reference 2022/2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the advance care planning engagement survey in Singapore.\",\"authors\":\"Gwendoline Wan Hua Tan, Ginny Si Min Quek, Nathaniel Jun Xian Lum, Lian Leng Low, Yu Xian Loo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-024-01640-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Singapore has an ageing population. End-of-life care and advance care planning are becoming increasingly important. To assess advance care planning engagement, valid tools are required. The primary objective of the study is to validate the 15-, 9- and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 inpatients in a Singapore community hospital were purposively sampled for a cognitive debriefing interview on the ACP Engagement Survey. We recruited patients 21 years and older, who were able to understand and speak English, without a diagnosis of dementia, and who were not admitted under the palliative care service. Next, 150 inpatients and caregivers were recruited using convenience sampling across 2 Singapore community hospitals to complete the 15-item ACP Engagement Survey. We assessed content validity, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha, construct validity with hypotheses testing and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ACPES scores were significantly higher for those who reported yes for pre-planning activities such as making a will, making a lasting power of attorney, telling one's doctor about end-of-life care preferences, and telling family or loved ones about end-of-life care preferences. Cronbach's alpha was 0.945 for the 15-item version, 0.915 for the 9-item version, and 0.912 for the 4-item version. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.933 for the 15-item version, 0.938 for the 9-item version and 0.865 for the 4-item version.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided good psychometric support for the validity of the 15-item, 9-item and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB) approved this study (reference 2022/2025).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720953/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01640-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01640-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新加坡人口老龄化。临终关怀和预先护理计划变得越来越重要。为了评估预先护理计划的参与,需要有效的工具。本研究的主要目的是验证新加坡ACP参与调查的15项、9项和4项版本。方法:对10名新加坡社区医院住院患者进行ACP参与调查的认知述职访谈。我们招募了21岁及以上的患者,他们能够理解和说英语,没有痴呆症的诊断,并且没有在姑息治疗服务下入院。接下来,采用方便抽样的方法,在新加坡两家社区医院招募了150名住院患者和护理人员,完成了包含15个项目的ACP参与调查。我们用Cronbach’s alpha评估内容效度和内部一致性,用假设检验评估结构效度,用类内相关系数评估重测信度。结果:在预先计划活动(如立遗嘱、立持久委托书、告诉医生临终关怀偏好、告诉家人或亲人临终关怀偏好)方面,那些回答“是”的人的ACPES得分明显更高。15项版本的Cronbach’s alpha为0.945,9项版本的Cronbach’s alpha为0.915,4项版本的Cronbach’s alpha为0.912。15项版本的类内相关系数为0.933,9项版本为0.938,4项版本为0.865。结论:本研究为新加坡ACP敬业度调查的15项、9项和4项版本的效度提供了良好的心理测量支持。试验注册:SingHealth中央机构审查委员会(CIRB)批准了这项研究(参考文献2022/2025)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the advance care planning engagement survey in Singapore.

Background: Singapore has an ageing population. End-of-life care and advance care planning are becoming increasingly important. To assess advance care planning engagement, valid tools are required. The primary objective of the study is to validate the 15-, 9- and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.

Methods: 10 inpatients in a Singapore community hospital were purposively sampled for a cognitive debriefing interview on the ACP Engagement Survey. We recruited patients 21 years and older, who were able to understand and speak English, without a diagnosis of dementia, and who were not admitted under the palliative care service. Next, 150 inpatients and caregivers were recruited using convenience sampling across 2 Singapore community hospitals to complete the 15-item ACP Engagement Survey. We assessed content validity, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha, construct validity with hypotheses testing and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: The ACPES scores were significantly higher for those who reported yes for pre-planning activities such as making a will, making a lasting power of attorney, telling one's doctor about end-of-life care preferences, and telling family or loved ones about end-of-life care preferences. Cronbach's alpha was 0.945 for the 15-item version, 0.915 for the 9-item version, and 0.912 for the 4-item version. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.933 for the 15-item version, 0.938 for the 9-item version and 0.865 for the 4-item version.

Conclusions: This study provided good psychometric support for the validity of the 15-item, 9-item and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.

Trial registration: SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB) approved this study (reference 2022/2025).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信