clottriver取栓系统大口径上肢静脉取栓进入臂静脉的安全性。

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Luke A Verst, Colvin Greenberg, David S Shin, Matthew Abad-Santos, Eric J Monroe, Mina S Makary, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
{"title":"clottriver取栓系统大口径上肢静脉取栓进入臂静脉的安全性。","authors":"Luke A Verst, Colvin Greenberg, David S Shin, Matthew Abad-Santos, Eric J Monroe, Mina S Makary, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00509-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate access site adverse events following ClotTriever-mediated large-bore mechanical thrombectomy via small upper extremity deep veins (< 6-mm).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients, including 24 upper extremity venous access sites, underwent ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy of the upper extremity and thoracic central veins for symptomatic deep vein obstruction unresponsive to anticoagulation. Patients without follow-up venous duplex examinations (n = 3) were excluded. Patients who had > 6-mm diameter veins accessed (n = 3) were excluded. Temporary purse-string sutures and manual pressure were used for access site hemostasis in all patients. Vein access site and diameter, technical success (defined as placement of the 13.5-French ClotTriever sheath followed by thrombectomy), and early (< 30-days) and late (> 30-days) access site-related adverse events (according to the Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (8 males, 6 females; mean age 51.7 ± 13.6 years) comprising 16 upper extremity venous access sites were included in this study. Access sites included: right brachial (n = 7), left brachial (n = 5), and bilateral brachial (n = 2) veins. The mean access site diameter was 4.3-mm ± 0.67-mm. Technical success was achieved via all access sites. Six (42.9%) patients underwent stent reconstruction following thrombectomy through the same accesses. After the procedure, all purse-string sutures were removed within 24 h. Three (21.4%) patients experienced small access site hematomas that did not require transfusion, intervention, or prolonged hospitalization. Initial follow-up venous duplex ultrasounds were performed at 29.3 ± 21.7 days following intervention. The mean follow-up interval to the second and third venous duplex ultrasounds were 124.3 ± 64-days and 225.1 ± 80.1 days, respectively. One (7.1%) patient developed right arm swelling six days after the procedure and was found to have thrombosis of the previously accessed right brachial vein. No other clinically or sonographically significant access site adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy via small upper extremity veins is safe with minimal access site adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"8 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of accessing brachial veins for large-bore upper extremity venous thrombectomy using ClotTriever Thrombectomy System.\",\"authors\":\"Luke A Verst, Colvin Greenberg, David S Shin, Matthew Abad-Santos, Eric J Monroe, Mina S Makary, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42155-024-00509-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate access site adverse events following ClotTriever-mediated large-bore mechanical thrombectomy via small upper extremity deep veins (< 6-mm).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients, including 24 upper extremity venous access sites, underwent ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy of the upper extremity and thoracic central veins for symptomatic deep vein obstruction unresponsive to anticoagulation. Patients without follow-up venous duplex examinations (n = 3) were excluded. Patients who had > 6-mm diameter veins accessed (n = 3) were excluded. Temporary purse-string sutures and manual pressure were used for access site hemostasis in all patients. Vein access site and diameter, technical success (defined as placement of the 13.5-French ClotTriever sheath followed by thrombectomy), and early (< 30-days) and late (> 30-days) access site-related adverse events (according to the Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (8 males, 6 females; mean age 51.7 ± 13.6 years) comprising 16 upper extremity venous access sites were included in this study. Access sites included: right brachial (n = 7), left brachial (n = 5), and bilateral brachial (n = 2) veins. The mean access site diameter was 4.3-mm ± 0.67-mm. Technical success was achieved via all access sites. Six (42.9%) patients underwent stent reconstruction following thrombectomy through the same accesses. After the procedure, all purse-string sutures were removed within 24 h. Three (21.4%) patients experienced small access site hematomas that did not require transfusion, intervention, or prolonged hospitalization. Initial follow-up venous duplex ultrasounds were performed at 29.3 ± 21.7 days following intervention. The mean follow-up interval to the second and third venous duplex ultrasounds were 124.3 ± 64-days and 225.1 ± 80.1 days, respectively. One (7.1%) patient developed right arm swelling six days after the procedure and was found to have thrombosis of the previously accessed right brachial vein. No other clinically or sonographically significant access site adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy via small upper extremity veins is safe with minimal access site adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00509-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00509-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价clottriver介导的经上肢小深静脉大口径机械取栓后的通路部位不良事件(材料和方法:20例患者,包括24个上肢静脉通路,因症状性深静脉阻塞,抗凝反应不佳,行clottriver介导的上肢和胸中央静脉大口径取栓术。没有随访静脉双工检查的患者(n = 3)被排除。排除静脉直径为6-mm的患者(n = 3)。所有患者均采用临时荷包缝合和手压止血。记录静脉通路位置和直径、技术成功(定义为放置13.5 french clottriver鞘并取栓)和早期(30天)通路部位相关不良事件(根据介入放射学会的不良事件分类标准)。结果:14例患者(男8例,女6例;平均年龄51.7±13.6岁,包括16个上肢静脉通路。通路部位包括:右肱静脉(n = 7)、左肱静脉(n = 5)和双侧肱静脉(n = 2)。平均通道直径为4.3 mm±0.67 mm。所有接入点都取得了技术上的成功。6例(42.9%)患者在取栓后通过相同的通道进行支架重建。手术后,所有的荷包缝合线在24小时内被拆除。3例(21.4%)患者出现小切口血肿,不需要输血、干预或延长住院时间。干预后29.3±21.7天进行静脉双工超声随访。第二次和第三次静脉双工超声的平均随访时间分别为124.3±64天和225.1±80.1天。1例(7.1%)患者在手术后6天出现右臂肿胀,并发现先前进入的右臂静脉血栓形成。未观察到其他临床或超声检查显著的通路部位不良事件。结论:clottriver介导的经上肢小静脉的大口径血栓切除术是安全的,且通路不良事件最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of accessing brachial veins for large-bore upper extremity venous thrombectomy using ClotTriever Thrombectomy System.

Purpose: To evaluate access site adverse events following ClotTriever-mediated large-bore mechanical thrombectomy via small upper extremity deep veins (< 6-mm).

Materials and methods: Twenty patients, including 24 upper extremity venous access sites, underwent ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy of the upper extremity and thoracic central veins for symptomatic deep vein obstruction unresponsive to anticoagulation. Patients without follow-up venous duplex examinations (n = 3) were excluded. Patients who had > 6-mm diameter veins accessed (n = 3) were excluded. Temporary purse-string sutures and manual pressure were used for access site hemostasis in all patients. Vein access site and diameter, technical success (defined as placement of the 13.5-French ClotTriever sheath followed by thrombectomy), and early (< 30-days) and late (> 30-days) access site-related adverse events (according to the Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology criteria) were recorded.

Results: Fourteen patients (8 males, 6 females; mean age 51.7 ± 13.6 years) comprising 16 upper extremity venous access sites were included in this study. Access sites included: right brachial (n = 7), left brachial (n = 5), and bilateral brachial (n = 2) veins. The mean access site diameter was 4.3-mm ± 0.67-mm. Technical success was achieved via all access sites. Six (42.9%) patients underwent stent reconstruction following thrombectomy through the same accesses. After the procedure, all purse-string sutures were removed within 24 h. Three (21.4%) patients experienced small access site hematomas that did not require transfusion, intervention, or prolonged hospitalization. Initial follow-up venous duplex ultrasounds were performed at 29.3 ± 21.7 days following intervention. The mean follow-up interval to the second and third venous duplex ultrasounds were 124.3 ± 64-days and 225.1 ± 80.1 days, respectively. One (7.1%) patient developed right arm swelling six days after the procedure and was found to have thrombosis of the previously accessed right brachial vein. No other clinically or sonographically significant access site adverse events were observed.

Conclusion: ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy via small upper extremity veins is safe with minimal access site adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信