{"title":"三种淋巴结分期在淋巴结≤12和淋巴结≤12的胰腺癌中的预后意义。","authors":"Yangyang Zheng, Rui Li, Jingyong Xu, Haowei Shi, Cheng Xing, Zhe Li, Hongyuan Cui, Jinghai Song","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02075-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of negative lymph nodes (NLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and N stage in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with ≤ 12 retrieved lymph nodes and those with > 12 retrieved lymph nodes. Moreover, the association between the three nodal staging systems and survival was also explored. Clinical data on patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2004 and 2020 were downloaded from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cox regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Survival probability was calculated and compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's C-index were used to evaluate the prognostic ability of each nodal staging system. All three lymph node staging systems were independent predictors of CSS and OS. A higher NLN, a lower N stage, and a lower LNR were associated with improved survival. Compared with N stage, LNR staging performed better with a lower AIC and higher C-index for predicting the prognosis regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes, while NLN staging performed poorly in both the training and validation set. Subgroup analyses showed that the NLN successfully predicted survival outcomes in both lymph node-positive and node-negative patients. LNR demonstrated better predictive performance in PDAC patients regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes. Notably, for stage N0 disease, NLN was a more important prognostic predictor. The combination of LNR and NLN may offer more precise information on lymph node staging than the current staging system.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic significance of three lymph node staging systems in pancreatic cancer with ≤ 12 and > 12 retrieved lymph nodes.\",\"authors\":\"Yangyang Zheng, Rui Li, Jingyong Xu, Haowei Shi, Cheng Xing, Zhe Li, Hongyuan Cui, Jinghai Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02075-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of negative lymph nodes (NLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and N stage in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with ≤ 12 retrieved lymph nodes and those with > 12 retrieved lymph nodes. Moreover, the association between the three nodal staging systems and survival was also explored. Clinical data on patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2004 and 2020 were downloaded from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cox regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Survival probability was calculated and compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's C-index were used to evaluate the prognostic ability of each nodal staging system. All three lymph node staging systems were independent predictors of CSS and OS. A higher NLN, a lower N stage, and a lower LNR were associated with improved survival. Compared with N stage, LNR staging performed better with a lower AIC and higher C-index for predicting the prognosis regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes, while NLN staging performed poorly in both the training and validation set. Subgroup analyses showed that the NLN successfully predicted survival outcomes in both lymph node-positive and node-negative patients. LNR demonstrated better predictive performance in PDAC patients regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes. Notably, for stage N0 disease, NLN was a more important prognostic predictor. The combination of LNR and NLN may offer more precise information on lymph node staging than the current staging system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02075-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02075-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估和比较阴性淋巴结(NLN)、淋巴结比率(LNR)和N分期在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者中≤12个淋巴结和> 12个淋巴结的预测性能。此外,还探讨了三种淋巴结分期系统与生存之间的关系。从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库下载了2004年至2020年间诊断为PDAC的患者的临床数据。采用Cox回归来确定癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总生存(OS)的独立预测因子。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier法和log rank检验进行计算和比较。采用赤池信息标准(Akaike information criterion, AIC)和Harrell’s c指数评价各分期系统的预后能力。所有三种淋巴结分期系统都是CSS和OS的独立预测因子。较高的NLN、较低的N期和较低的LNR与生存率的提高有关。与N分期相比,无论淋巴结是否充足,LNR分期在预测预后方面都具有较低的AIC和较高的c指数,而NLN分期在训练集和验证集上的表现都较差。亚组分析显示,NLN成功预测了淋巴结阳性和淋巴结阴性患者的生存结果。LNR在PDAC患者中表现出更好的预测效果,无论是否有足够的淋巴结。值得注意的是,对于N0期疾病,NLN是一个更重要的预后预测因子。LNR和NLN的结合可能比目前的分期系统提供更精确的淋巴结分期信息。
Prognostic significance of three lymph node staging systems in pancreatic cancer with ≤ 12 and > 12 retrieved lymph nodes.
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of negative lymph nodes (NLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and N stage in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with ≤ 12 retrieved lymph nodes and those with > 12 retrieved lymph nodes. Moreover, the association between the three nodal staging systems and survival was also explored. Clinical data on patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2004 and 2020 were downloaded from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cox regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Survival probability was calculated and compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's C-index were used to evaluate the prognostic ability of each nodal staging system. All three lymph node staging systems were independent predictors of CSS and OS. A higher NLN, a lower N stage, and a lower LNR were associated with improved survival. Compared with N stage, LNR staging performed better with a lower AIC and higher C-index for predicting the prognosis regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes, while NLN staging performed poorly in both the training and validation set. Subgroup analyses showed that the NLN successfully predicted survival outcomes in both lymph node-positive and node-negative patients. LNR demonstrated better predictive performance in PDAC patients regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes. Notably, for stage N0 disease, NLN was a more important prognostic predictor. The combination of LNR and NLN may offer more precise information on lymph node staging than the current staging system.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.