评估非语言认知干预对全面性失语症功能性沟通的影响:个案系列研究。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sharon Adjei-Nicol, Carol Sacchett, Suzanne Beeke
{"title":"评估非语言认知干预对全面性失语症功能性沟通的影响:个案系列研究。","authors":"Sharon Adjei-Nicol, Carol Sacchett, Suzanne Beeke","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global aphasia is a severe communication disorder affecting all language modalities, commonly caused by stroke. Evidence as to whether the functional communication of people with global aphasia (PwGA) can improve after speech and language therapy (SLT) is limited and conflicting. This is partly because cognition, which is relevant to participation in therapy and implicated in successful functional communication, can be severely impaired in global aphasia. Cognitive treatments that aim to improve functional communication for people with aphasia do exist, but few have been trialled with PwGA and no studies have robustly demonstrated gains.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effect of a novel non-linguistic cognitive intervention on the functional communication skills of PwGA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A non-linguistic intervention, developed to target cognitive skills underpinning functional communication, was delivered to six participants three times weekly for up to 6 weeks (depending on the rate of progression through the intervention programme). All participants met the criteria for global aphasia following screening with the Western Aphasia Battery Bedside Record Form. A multiple baseline case series design was employed to investigate changes in functional communication using the American Speech and Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication (ASHA-FACS). Secondary outcome measures were auditory comprehension and informal tests of non-verbal cognition. Statistical analyses of change after intervention were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and weighted statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants completed the intervention programme in an average of nine sessions. Four out of six participants made statistically significant gains in functional communication as measured by communication independence (amount of assistance or prompting required) on the ASHA-FACS. Five of six participants made statistically significant gains in non-verbal semantics, two in non-verbal reasoning and two in auditory comprehension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings provide preliminary evidence that a non-linguistic cognitive intervention delivered with a dose replicable in clinical practice can improve functional communication and non-verbal cognition in some PwGA. This finding contrasts with much existing evidence suggesting that improvements in global aphasia can be achieved only after intensive or prolonged input over many years.</p><p><strong>What this paper adds: </strong>What is already known on the subject People with global aphasia (PwGA) have the potential to make impairment level gains after intensive or prolonged speech and language therapy (SLT). However, evidence of functional communication gains is limited. Cognition plays an important role in functional communication, particularly the ability to switch to alternative means of communication and switch modalities. What this study adds Contrary to many previous studies, the findings indicate that PwGA can benefit from SLT and make functional communication gains with a relatively low dose of intervention. The findings highlight cognitive skills that appear relevant to basic functional communication abilities in PwGA. These are: attention, visual perception, semantics and non-verbal problem solving. What are the clinical implications of this work? This work suggests that clinicians should offer cognitive, non-linguistic interventions to PwGA and consider delivering intervention using little to no verbal language.</p>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 1","pages":"e13155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effect of a non-linguistic cognitive intervention on functional communication in global aphasia: A case series study.\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Adjei-Nicol, Carol Sacchett, Suzanne Beeke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1460-6984.13155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global aphasia is a severe communication disorder affecting all language modalities, commonly caused by stroke. Evidence as to whether the functional communication of people with global aphasia (PwGA) can improve after speech and language therapy (SLT) is limited and conflicting. This is partly because cognition, which is relevant to participation in therapy and implicated in successful functional communication, can be severely impaired in global aphasia. Cognitive treatments that aim to improve functional communication for people with aphasia do exist, but few have been trialled with PwGA and no studies have robustly demonstrated gains.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effect of a novel non-linguistic cognitive intervention on the functional communication skills of PwGA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A non-linguistic intervention, developed to target cognitive skills underpinning functional communication, was delivered to six participants three times weekly for up to 6 weeks (depending on the rate of progression through the intervention programme). All participants met the criteria for global aphasia following screening with the Western Aphasia Battery Bedside Record Form. A multiple baseline case series design was employed to investigate changes in functional communication using the American Speech and Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication (ASHA-FACS). Secondary outcome measures were auditory comprehension and informal tests of non-verbal cognition. Statistical analyses of change after intervention were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and weighted statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants completed the intervention programme in an average of nine sessions. Four out of six participants made statistically significant gains in functional communication as measured by communication independence (amount of assistance or prompting required) on the ASHA-FACS. Five of six participants made statistically significant gains in non-verbal semantics, two in non-verbal reasoning and two in auditory comprehension.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings provide preliminary evidence that a non-linguistic cognitive intervention delivered with a dose replicable in clinical practice can improve functional communication and non-verbal cognition in some PwGA. This finding contrasts with much existing evidence suggesting that improvements in global aphasia can be achieved only after intensive or prolonged input over many years.</p><p><strong>What this paper adds: </strong>What is already known on the subject People with global aphasia (PwGA) have the potential to make impairment level gains after intensive or prolonged speech and language therapy (SLT). However, evidence of functional communication gains is limited. Cognition plays an important role in functional communication, particularly the ability to switch to alternative means of communication and switch modalities. What this study adds Contrary to many previous studies, the findings indicate that PwGA can benefit from SLT and make functional communication gains with a relatively low dose of intervention. The findings highlight cognitive skills that appear relevant to basic functional communication abilities in PwGA. These are: attention, visual perception, semantics and non-verbal problem solving. What are the clinical implications of this work? This work suggests that clinicians should offer cognitive, non-linguistic interventions to PwGA and consider delivering intervention using little to no verbal language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"e13155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.13155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全面性失语症是一种影响所有语言形式的严重沟通障碍,通常由中风引起。关于全面性失语症(PwGA)患者在接受言语语言治疗(SLT)后是否能改善功能性交流的证据有限且相互矛盾。这在一定程度上是因为认知能力在全面性失语症中可能严重受损,而认知能力与参与治疗和成功的功能性沟通有关。旨在改善失语症患者功能性沟通的认知治疗确实存在,但很少有针对PwGA的试验,也没有研究有力地证明其效果。目的:本研究旨在探讨一种新的非语言认知干预对残疾儿童功能性沟通技能的影响。方法:对6名参与者进行非语言干预,针对支持功能性沟通的认知技能,每周进行3次,持续6周(取决于干预计划的进展速度)。所有的参与者在使用《西方失语症电池床边记录表》进行筛选后都符合全球失语症的标准。采用美国言语听力协会沟通功能评估(ASHA-FACS),采用多基线病例系列设计来调查功能性沟通的变化。次要结果测量是听觉理解和非语言认知的非正式测试。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和加权统计对干预后的变化进行统计分析。结果:参与者平均在9个疗程内完成干预方案。通过在ASHA-FACS上的沟通独立性(所需的帮助或提示的数量)来衡量,六名参与者中有四名在功能性沟通方面取得了统计上显著的进步。6名参与者中有5人在非语言语义、2人在非语言推理和2人在听觉理解方面取得了统计学上显著的进步。结论:研究结果提供了初步证据,证明临床可复制剂量的非语言认知干预可以改善部分PwGA的功能性沟通和非语言认知。这一发现与许多现有证据形成对比,这些证据表明,只有经过多年的密集或长时间的投入,才能实现对全身性失语症的改善。本文补充的内容:关于这一主题的已知内容患有全面性失语症(PwGA)的人在接受强化或长时间的言语和语言治疗(SLT)后,有可能达到损伤水平。然而,功能性通信增益的证据是有限的。认知在功能性交际中起着重要的作用,特别是转换到替代交际手段和转换方式的能力。与之前的许多研究相反,研究结果表明,PwGA可以从SLT中受益,并在相对较低的干预剂量下获得功能性通信增益。研究结果强调了认知技能似乎与PwGA的基本功能性沟通能力有关。它们是:注意力、视觉感知、语义学和非语言问题解决。这项工作的临床意义是什么?这项研究表明,临床医生应该为PwGA提供认知、非语言干预,并考虑使用很少或不使用口头语言进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the effect of a non-linguistic cognitive intervention on functional communication in global aphasia: A case series study.

Background: Global aphasia is a severe communication disorder affecting all language modalities, commonly caused by stroke. Evidence as to whether the functional communication of people with global aphasia (PwGA) can improve after speech and language therapy (SLT) is limited and conflicting. This is partly because cognition, which is relevant to participation in therapy and implicated in successful functional communication, can be severely impaired in global aphasia. Cognitive treatments that aim to improve functional communication for people with aphasia do exist, but few have been trialled with PwGA and no studies have robustly demonstrated gains.

Aim: This study aimed to explore the effect of a novel non-linguistic cognitive intervention on the functional communication skills of PwGA.

Method: A non-linguistic intervention, developed to target cognitive skills underpinning functional communication, was delivered to six participants three times weekly for up to 6 weeks (depending on the rate of progression through the intervention programme). All participants met the criteria for global aphasia following screening with the Western Aphasia Battery Bedside Record Form. A multiple baseline case series design was employed to investigate changes in functional communication using the American Speech and Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication (ASHA-FACS). Secondary outcome measures were auditory comprehension and informal tests of non-verbal cognition. Statistical analyses of change after intervention were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and weighted statistics.

Results: Participants completed the intervention programme in an average of nine sessions. Four out of six participants made statistically significant gains in functional communication as measured by communication independence (amount of assistance or prompting required) on the ASHA-FACS. Five of six participants made statistically significant gains in non-verbal semantics, two in non-verbal reasoning and two in auditory comprehension.

Conclusion: The findings provide preliminary evidence that a non-linguistic cognitive intervention delivered with a dose replicable in clinical practice can improve functional communication and non-verbal cognition in some PwGA. This finding contrasts with much existing evidence suggesting that improvements in global aphasia can be achieved only after intensive or prolonged input over many years.

What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject People with global aphasia (PwGA) have the potential to make impairment level gains after intensive or prolonged speech and language therapy (SLT). However, evidence of functional communication gains is limited. Cognition plays an important role in functional communication, particularly the ability to switch to alternative means of communication and switch modalities. What this study adds Contrary to many previous studies, the findings indicate that PwGA can benefit from SLT and make functional communication gains with a relatively low dose of intervention. The findings highlight cognitive skills that appear relevant to basic functional communication abilities in PwGA. These are: attention, visual perception, semantics and non-verbal problem solving. What are the clinical implications of this work? This work suggests that clinicians should offer cognitive, non-linguistic interventions to PwGA and consider delivering intervention using little to no verbal language.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信