临床实践中老年人价值阐明工具的范围综述。

Geerke van den Bosch, Kathelijn Versteeg, Suzanne Metselaar, Lotte Koot, George Burchell, Olaf Geerse, Josephine M J Stoffels
{"title":"临床实践中老年人价值阐明工具的范围综述。","authors":"Geerke van den Bosch, Kathelijn Versteeg, Suzanne Metselaar, Lotte Koot, George Burchell, Olaf Geerse, Josephine M J Stoffels","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To ensure appropriate care for the individual older adult, an ideal treatment should align with patients' values. However, healthcare professionals struggle with how to elucidate patient values effectively. To offer guidance to healthcare professionals, we performed a scoping review, thereby mapping and categorizing instruments specifically developed to elucidate values of older adults in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted from inception up to October 2023 in PubMed, Psychinfo, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Articles on instruments clarifying older adults' values in a clinical setting were included. Articles on instruments elucidating patients' wishes, preferences, or goals were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 7759 eligible studies, we included 37 studies outlining unique instruments. Instruments were subdivided into the following categories, based on the setting in which the instruments were used: \"instruments with a general scope,\" \"health record-based interventions,\" \"advance directives,\" \"advance care planning programs,\" and \"decision support tools.\" Values were made plain in different ways, and instruments promoted different approaches. We further categorized these approaches alongside different axes: \"open versus closed,\" \"process-oriented versus decision-oriented,\" \"confronting versus nonconfronting,\" and \"explicit versus implicit.\" Some instruments focused on establishing a process of deliberation, whereas others focused on achieving treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found and categorized a large range of instruments, which promoted different ways to elucidate older adults' values. This scoping review serves as an introduction for healthcare professionals to available instruments, which help to clarify patients' values. By categorizing the instruments along different axes of approaching value clarification, we offer healthcare professionals guidance for selecting an appropriate instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instruments for Value Elucidation in Older Adults in Clinical Practice-A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Geerke van den Bosch, Kathelijn Versteeg, Suzanne Metselaar, Lotte Koot, George Burchell, Olaf Geerse, Josephine M J Stoffels\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To ensure appropriate care for the individual older adult, an ideal treatment should align with patients' values. However, healthcare professionals struggle with how to elucidate patient values effectively. To offer guidance to healthcare professionals, we performed a scoping review, thereby mapping and categorizing instruments specifically developed to elucidate values of older adults in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted from inception up to October 2023 in PubMed, Psychinfo, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Articles on instruments clarifying older adults' values in a clinical setting were included. Articles on instruments elucidating patients' wishes, preferences, or goals were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 7759 eligible studies, we included 37 studies outlining unique instruments. Instruments were subdivided into the following categories, based on the setting in which the instruments were used: \\\"instruments with a general scope,\\\" \\\"health record-based interventions,\\\" \\\"advance directives,\\\" \\\"advance care planning programs,\\\" and \\\"decision support tools.\\\" Values were made plain in different ways, and instruments promoted different approaches. We further categorized these approaches alongside different axes: \\\"open versus closed,\\\" \\\"process-oriented versus decision-oriented,\\\" \\\"confronting versus nonconfronting,\\\" and \\\"explicit versus implicit.\\\" Some instruments focused on establishing a process of deliberation, whereas others focused on achieving treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found and categorized a large range of instruments, which promoted different ways to elucidate older adults' values. This scoping review serves as an introduction for healthcare professionals to available instruments, which help to clarify patients' values. By categorizing the instruments along different axes of approaching value clarification, we offer healthcare professionals guidance for selecting an appropriate instrument.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了确保对老年人个体的适当护理,理想的治疗应该与患者的价值观相一致。然而,医疗保健专业人员在如何有效地阐明患者价值方面挣扎。为了给医疗保健专业人员提供指导,我们进行了范围审查,从而绘制和分类了专门为阐明老年人在临床实践中的价值而开发的工具。方法:系统检索PubMed、Psychinfo、CINAHL和Cochrane Library,检索时间自成立至2023年10月。关于阐明老年人在临床环境中的价值的仪器的文章被包括在内。关于阐明患者意愿、偏好或目标的器械的文章被排除在外。结果:在筛选了7759项符合条件的研究后,我们纳入了37项研究,概述了独特的仪器。根据使用工具的环境,工具被细分为以下类别:“具有一般范围的工具”、“基于健康记录的干预措施”、“预先指示”、“预先护理计划程序”和“决策支持工具”。价值观以不同的方式表达出来,工具促进了不同的方法。我们进一步根据不同的轴对这些方法进行分类:“开放与封闭”,“面向过程与面向决策”,“对抗与非对抗”,以及“显性与隐性”。一些文书侧重于建立一个审议过程,而另一些文书侧重于达成治疗决定。结论:我们发现并分类了大量的工具,促进了不同的方式来阐明老年人的价值观。这一范围审查是医疗保健专业人员对现有仪器的介绍,有助于澄清患者的价值。通过沿着接近价值澄清的不同轴对仪器进行分类,我们为医疗保健专业人员提供选择适当仪器的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instruments for Value Elucidation in Older Adults in Clinical Practice-A Scoping Review.

Background: To ensure appropriate care for the individual older adult, an ideal treatment should align with patients' values. However, healthcare professionals struggle with how to elucidate patient values effectively. To offer guidance to healthcare professionals, we performed a scoping review, thereby mapping and categorizing instruments specifically developed to elucidate values of older adults in clinical practice.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted from inception up to October 2023 in PubMed, Psychinfo, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Articles on instruments clarifying older adults' values in a clinical setting were included. Articles on instruments elucidating patients' wishes, preferences, or goals were excluded.

Results: After screening 7759 eligible studies, we included 37 studies outlining unique instruments. Instruments were subdivided into the following categories, based on the setting in which the instruments were used: "instruments with a general scope," "health record-based interventions," "advance directives," "advance care planning programs," and "decision support tools." Values were made plain in different ways, and instruments promoted different approaches. We further categorized these approaches alongside different axes: "open versus closed," "process-oriented versus decision-oriented," "confronting versus nonconfronting," and "explicit versus implicit." Some instruments focused on establishing a process of deliberation, whereas others focused on achieving treatment decisions.

Conclusion: We found and categorized a large range of instruments, which promoted different ways to elucidate older adults' values. This scoping review serves as an introduction for healthcare professionals to available instruments, which help to clarify patients' values. By categorizing the instruments along different axes of approaching value clarification, we offer healthcare professionals guidance for selecting an appropriate instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信