Guadalupe Oñate, Ana Garrido, Montserrat Arnan, Helena Pomares, Ester Alonso, Mar Tormo, Marina Diaz-Beya, Susana Vives, Lurdes Zamora, Antonia Sampol, Rosa Coll, Olga Salamero, Marta Cervera, Antoni Garcia, Ferran Vall-Llovera, Sara Garcia-Avila, Joan Bargay, Xavier Ortin, Eva Iranzo, Francisca Guijarro, Marta Pratcorona, Josep F. Nomdedeu, Jordi Esteve, Jorge Sierra
{"title":"对来自CETLAM集团的1034例AML患者进行强化风险适应治疗后的不同现实预后","authors":"Guadalupe Oñate, Ana Garrido, Montserrat Arnan, Helena Pomares, Ester Alonso, Mar Tormo, Marina Diaz-Beya, Susana Vives, Lurdes Zamora, Antonia Sampol, Rosa Coll, Olga Salamero, Marta Cervera, Antoni Garcia, Ferran Vall-Llovera, Sara Garcia-Avila, Joan Bargay, Xavier Ortin, Eva Iranzo, Francisca Guijarro, Marta Pratcorona, Josep F. Nomdedeu, Jordi Esteve, Jorge Sierra","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01205-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia patients, it is necessary to identify patients considered fit for intensive therapy but who will perform poorly, and in whom alternative approaches deserve investigation. We analyzed 1034 fit adults ≤70 years intensively treated between 2012 and 2022 in the CETLAM group. Young adults ( ≤ 60 years) presented higher remission rates and improved survival than older adults above that age (CR 79% vs. 73%; <i>p</i> = 0.03 and 4-yr OS 53% vs. 33%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Remission and survival outcomes varied among different genetic subsets. An especially adverse genetic group included complex, monosomal karyotype, <i>TP53</i> alterations (deleted/mutated), and <i>MECOMr</i>. Transplant feasibility in this very adverse risk group was low, and OS and EFS at 4 years were 14% and 12%, in contrast to 70% and 57% in the favorable group and 38% and 32% in all other patients. We integrated clinical and genetic data into the Intensive Chemotherapy Score for AML (ICSA) with 6-risk categories with significantly different remission rates and OS, validated in another cohort of 581 AML patients from a previous CETLAM protocol. In summary, we identified groups of fit patients that benefit differently from an intensive approach which may be helpful in future treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diverse real-life outcomes after intensive risk-adapted therapy for 1034 AML patients from the CETLAM Group\",\"authors\":\"Guadalupe Oñate, Ana Garrido, Montserrat Arnan, Helena Pomares, Ester Alonso, Mar Tormo, Marina Diaz-Beya, Susana Vives, Lurdes Zamora, Antonia Sampol, Rosa Coll, Olga Salamero, Marta Cervera, Antoni Garcia, Ferran Vall-Llovera, Sara Garcia-Avila, Joan Bargay, Xavier Ortin, Eva Iranzo, Francisca Guijarro, Marta Pratcorona, Josep F. Nomdedeu, Jordi Esteve, Jorge Sierra\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-024-01205-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Given the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia patients, it is necessary to identify patients considered fit for intensive therapy but who will perform poorly, and in whom alternative approaches deserve investigation. We analyzed 1034 fit adults ≤70 years intensively treated between 2012 and 2022 in the CETLAM group. Young adults ( ≤ 60 years) presented higher remission rates and improved survival than older adults above that age (CR 79% vs. 73%; <i>p</i> = 0.03 and 4-yr OS 53% vs. 33%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Remission and survival outcomes varied among different genetic subsets. An especially adverse genetic group included complex, monosomal karyotype, <i>TP53</i> alterations (deleted/mutated), and <i>MECOMr</i>. Transplant feasibility in this very adverse risk group was low, and OS and EFS at 4 years were 14% and 12%, in contrast to 70% and 57% in the favorable group and 38% and 32% in all other patients. We integrated clinical and genetic data into the Intensive Chemotherapy Score for AML (ICSA) with 6-risk categories with significantly different remission rates and OS, validated in another cohort of 581 AML patients from a previous CETLAM protocol. In summary, we identified groups of fit patients that benefit differently from an intensive approach which may be helpful in future treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01205-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01205-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鉴于急性髓系白血病患者的异质性,有必要确定适合强化治疗但表现不佳的患者,以及值得研究替代方法的患者。我们分析了2012年至2022年间在CETLAM组中接受强化治疗的1034名≤70岁的适合成年人。年轻人(≤60岁)的缓解率和生存率均高于60岁以上的老年人(CR 79% vs 73%;p = 0.03, 4年OS 53% vs 33%;p < 0.001)。缓解和生存结果因不同的遗传亚群而异。特别不利的遗传组包括复杂、单染色体核型、TP53改变(缺失/突变)和MECOMr。该极不良风险组的移植可行性较低,4年时OS和EFS分别为14%和12%,而良好组为70%和57%,其他所有患者为38%和32%。我们将临床和遗传数据整合到AML的强化化疗评分(ICSA)中,该评分包含6个风险类别,缓解率和OS显著不同,并在另一个来自先前CETLAM方案的581例AML患者中得到验证。总之,我们确定了适合的患者组,他们从强化方法中获益不同,这可能有助于未来的治疗决策。
Diverse real-life outcomes after intensive risk-adapted therapy for 1034 AML patients from the CETLAM Group
Given the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia patients, it is necessary to identify patients considered fit for intensive therapy but who will perform poorly, and in whom alternative approaches deserve investigation. We analyzed 1034 fit adults ≤70 years intensively treated between 2012 and 2022 in the CETLAM group. Young adults ( ≤ 60 years) presented higher remission rates and improved survival than older adults above that age (CR 79% vs. 73%; p = 0.03 and 4-yr OS 53% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Remission and survival outcomes varied among different genetic subsets. An especially adverse genetic group included complex, monosomal karyotype, TP53 alterations (deleted/mutated), and MECOMr. Transplant feasibility in this very adverse risk group was low, and OS and EFS at 4 years were 14% and 12%, in contrast to 70% and 57% in the favorable group and 38% and 32% in all other patients. We integrated clinical and genetic data into the Intensive Chemotherapy Score for AML (ICSA) with 6-risk categories with significantly different remission rates and OS, validated in another cohort of 581 AML patients from a previous CETLAM protocol. In summary, we identified groups of fit patients that benefit differently from an intensive approach which may be helpful in future treatment decisions.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.