Carla Zimerer PhD , Sabrina Pereira Alves MSc , Raquel Casagrande Khéde MS , Weverton Rufo-Tavares MSc , Luciana Carletti PhD , Rodrigo Luiz Vancini PhD , Anselmo José Perez PhD , Richard Diego Leite Leite PhD
{"title":"10周壶铃训练负荷分配对娱乐性训练女性力量和有氧能力的影响及评价。","authors":"Carla Zimerer PhD , Sabrina Pereira Alves MSc , Raquel Casagrande Khéde MS , Weverton Rufo-Tavares MSc , Luciana Carletti PhD , Rodrigo Luiz Vancini PhD , Anselmo José Perez PhD , Richard Diego Leite Leite PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>: The purpose of this study was to characterize the dynamic distribution of training loads in a kettlebell program and evaluate its effects on muscle strength and aerobic capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fourteen recreationally active women with no kettlebell training experience (age: 25.86 ± 5.35 years; V̇O<sub>2</sub>max = 35.14 ± 5.58 mL/kg/min; body mass = 62.13 ± 13.40 kg; height = 164.75 ± 5.77 cm; body mass index = 22.68 ± 3.99 kg/m²) completed a 10-week kettlebell training program. The kettlebell training program was divided into three phases: Phase I (2 weeks), phase II (4 weeks), and Phase III (4 weeks). Maximum muscle strength (1RM) and aerobic fitness (V̇O<sub>2</sub>max) measurements were performed before (Pre) and after (Post) training. The external and internal loads were represented by the session's total volume and perceived exertion method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>An increase in maximum strength (<em>P</em> < .001; <em>∆</em>% = 23.73; effect size = 0.87) and V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (<em>P</em> = .004; <em>∆</em>% = 9.63; effect size = 0.57) was observed when comparing Pre and Post measurements. There was an increase in total volume when phases I and II (<em>P</em> < .001), phases I and III (<em>P</em> < .001), and phases II and III (<em>P</em> < .001) of the training were compared. The internal load values increased significantly between phases I and II (<em>P</em> < .001). However, there was no difference when comparing phases II and III (<em>P</em> = .796).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The total volume increases during the training phases, and the training load was similar in phases II and III. Furthermore, were observed higher V̇O<sub>2</sub>max and strength (1 RM load) values.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Evaluation of a 10-Week Kettlebell Training Load Distribution on Strength and Aerobic Capacity in Recreationally Trained Women\",\"authors\":\"Carla Zimerer PhD , Sabrina Pereira Alves MSc , Raquel Casagrande Khéde MS , Weverton Rufo-Tavares MSc , Luciana Carletti PhD , Rodrigo Luiz Vancini PhD , Anselmo José Perez PhD , Richard Diego Leite Leite PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>: The purpose of this study was to characterize the dynamic distribution of training loads in a kettlebell program and evaluate its effects on muscle strength and aerobic capacity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fourteen recreationally active women with no kettlebell training experience (age: 25.86 ± 5.35 years; V̇O<sub>2</sub>max = 35.14 ± 5.58 mL/kg/min; body mass = 62.13 ± 13.40 kg; height = 164.75 ± 5.77 cm; body mass index = 22.68 ± 3.99 kg/m²) completed a 10-week kettlebell training program. The kettlebell training program was divided into three phases: Phase I (2 weeks), phase II (4 weeks), and Phase III (4 weeks). Maximum muscle strength (1RM) and aerobic fitness (V̇O<sub>2</sub>max) measurements were performed before (Pre) and after (Post) training. The external and internal loads were represented by the session's total volume and perceived exertion method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>An increase in maximum strength (<em>P</em> < .001; <em>∆</em>% = 23.73; effect size = 0.87) and V̇O<sub>2</sub>max (<em>P</em> = .004; <em>∆</em>% = 9.63; effect size = 0.57) was observed when comparing Pre and Post measurements. There was an increase in total volume when phases I and II (<em>P</em> < .001), phases I and III (<em>P</em> < .001), and phases II and III (<em>P</em> < .001) of the training were compared. The internal load values increased significantly between phases I and II (<em>P</em> < .001). However, there was no difference when comparing phases II and III (<em>P</em> = .796).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The total volume increases during the training phases, and the training load was similar in phases II and III. Furthermore, were observed higher V̇O<sub>2</sub>max and strength (1 RM load) values.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 186-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation and Evaluation of a 10-Week Kettlebell Training Load Distribution on Strength and Aerobic Capacity in Recreationally Trained Women
Objective
: The purpose of this study was to characterize the dynamic distribution of training loads in a kettlebell program and evaluate its effects on muscle strength and aerobic capacity.
Methods
Fourteen recreationally active women with no kettlebell training experience (age: 25.86 ± 5.35 years; V̇O2max = 35.14 ± 5.58 mL/kg/min; body mass = 62.13 ± 13.40 kg; height = 164.75 ± 5.77 cm; body mass index = 22.68 ± 3.99 kg/m²) completed a 10-week kettlebell training program. The kettlebell training program was divided into three phases: Phase I (2 weeks), phase II (4 weeks), and Phase III (4 weeks). Maximum muscle strength (1RM) and aerobic fitness (V̇O2max) measurements were performed before (Pre) and after (Post) training. The external and internal loads were represented by the session's total volume and perceived exertion method.
Results
An increase in maximum strength (P < .001; ∆% = 23.73; effect size = 0.87) and V̇O2max (P = .004; ∆% = 9.63; effect size = 0.57) was observed when comparing Pre and Post measurements. There was an increase in total volume when phases I and II (P < .001), phases I and III (P < .001), and phases II and III (P < .001) of the training were compared. The internal load values increased significantly between phases I and II (P < .001). However, there was no difference when comparing phases II and III (P = .796).
Conclusion
The total volume increases during the training phases, and the training load was similar in phases II and III. Furthermore, were observed higher V̇O2max and strength (1 RM load) values.