Alisson Henrique Marinho PhD , Gleyce Maria dos Santos Cavalcante MS , Maria da Glória David Silva Costa MS , Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes PhD , Gustavo Gomes de Araujo PhD
{"title":"健康老年人普拉提训练前后的咖啡因反应。","authors":"Alisson Henrique Marinho PhD , Gleyce Maria dos Santos Cavalcante MS , Maria da Glória David Silva Costa MS , Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes PhD , Gustavo Gomes de Araujo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to assess responsiveness to the effects of acute caffeine intake after 8 weeks of Pilates intervention in healthy older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifteen healthy older adults performed physical performance regarding daily practice, strength, and balance tests after ingestion of acute 5 mg/kg of caffeine or placebo before and after Pilates training.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The caffeine intake reduced, regardless of Pilates training, the time in 10-m walk test (before placebo vs caffeine, 6.48 ± 0.70 vs 6.51 ± 0.82 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 5.84 ± 0.70 vs 5.48 ± 0.61 seconds; <em>P</em> = .008; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.404) and timed up and go test (before placebo vs caffeine, 26.30 ± 1.82 vs 24.37 ± 2.12 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 22.96 ± 2.36 vs 22.49 ± 2.27 seconds; <em>P</em> = .002; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.517) compared with the placebo. Participants were not less responsive to caffeine intake in the 10-m walk test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −0.33 ± 0.66 vs −0.36 ± 0.53 seconds; <em>P</em> = .888), but they were less responsive for the timed up and go test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −1.92 ± 2.06 vs −0.47 ± 1.15 seconds; <em>P</em> = 0.030) after Pilates intervention. There were no differences for the sit-to-stand test, rising from the floor, dress and undress T-shirt, handgrip strength, and balance variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the caffeine improved on the 10-m walk test and timed up and go test performance, healthy older adults were less responsive to caffeine after Pilates training only for performance on the timed up and go test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caffeine Responsiveness Before and After Pilates Training in Healthy Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Alisson Henrique Marinho PhD , Gleyce Maria dos Santos Cavalcante MS , Maria da Glória David Silva Costa MS , Amandio Aristides Rihan Geraldes PhD , Gustavo Gomes de Araujo PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to assess responsiveness to the effects of acute caffeine intake after 8 weeks of Pilates intervention in healthy older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifteen healthy older adults performed physical performance regarding daily practice, strength, and balance tests after ingestion of acute 5 mg/kg of caffeine or placebo before and after Pilates training.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The caffeine intake reduced, regardless of Pilates training, the time in 10-m walk test (before placebo vs caffeine, 6.48 ± 0.70 vs 6.51 ± 0.82 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 5.84 ± 0.70 vs 5.48 ± 0.61 seconds; <em>P</em> = .008; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.404) and timed up and go test (before placebo vs caffeine, 26.30 ± 1.82 vs 24.37 ± 2.12 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 22.96 ± 2.36 vs 22.49 ± 2.27 seconds; <em>P</em> = .002; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.517) compared with the placebo. Participants were not less responsive to caffeine intake in the 10-m walk test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −0.33 ± 0.66 vs −0.36 ± 0.53 seconds; <em>P</em> = .888), but they were less responsive for the timed up and go test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −1.92 ± 2.06 vs −0.47 ± 1.15 seconds; <em>P</em> = 0.030) after Pilates intervention. There were no differences for the sit-to-stand test, rising from the floor, dress and undress T-shirt, handgrip strength, and balance variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although the caffeine improved on the 10-m walk test and timed up and go test performance, healthy older adults were less responsive to caffeine after Pilates training only for performance on the timed up and go test.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 178-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估健康老年人在8周的普拉提干预后对急性咖啡因摄入影响的反应性。方法:15名健康老年人在普拉提训练前后摄入急性5mg /kg咖啡因或安慰剂后,进行日常练习、力量和平衡测试。结果:无论普拉提训练如何,咖啡因摄入量减少,10米步行测试时间(安慰剂vs咖啡因前,6.48±0.70 vs 6.51±0.82秒;安慰剂vs咖啡因分别为5.84±0.70 vs 5.48±0.61秒;P = 0.008;ηp 2 = 0.404)和up and go测试(安慰剂组vs咖啡因组,26.30±1.82 vs 24.37±2.12秒;安慰剂vs咖啡因分别为22.96±2.36 vs 22.49±2.27秒;P = .002;ηp 2 = 0.517)。在10米步行测试中,参与者对咖啡因摄入的反应并没有降低(ΔPre vs ΔPost, -0.33±0.66 vs -0.36±0.53秒;P = .888),但在计时起走测试中反应较差(ΔPre vs ΔPost, -1.92±2.06 vs -0.47±1.15秒;P = 0.030)。坐立测试、从地板上站起来、穿t恤和不穿t恤、握力和平衡变量没有差异。结论:虽然咖啡因改善了10米步行测试和计时和走测试的表现,但健康的老年人在普拉提训练后对咖啡因的反应较弱,仅对计时和走测试的表现。
Caffeine Responsiveness Before and After Pilates Training in Healthy Older Adults
Objective
The study aimed to assess responsiveness to the effects of acute caffeine intake after 8 weeks of Pilates intervention in healthy older adults.
Methods
Fifteen healthy older adults performed physical performance regarding daily practice, strength, and balance tests after ingestion of acute 5 mg/kg of caffeine or placebo before and after Pilates training.
Results
The caffeine intake reduced, regardless of Pilates training, the time in 10-m walk test (before placebo vs caffeine, 6.48 ± 0.70 vs 6.51 ± 0.82 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 5.84 ± 0.70 vs 5.48 ± 0.61 seconds; P = .008; ηp2 = 0.404) and timed up and go test (before placebo vs caffeine, 26.30 ± 1.82 vs 24.37 ± 2.12 seconds; after placebo vs caffeine, 22.96 ± 2.36 vs 22.49 ± 2.27 seconds; P = .002; ηp2 = 0.517) compared with the placebo. Participants were not less responsive to caffeine intake in the 10-m walk test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −0.33 ± 0.66 vs −0.36 ± 0.53 seconds; P = .888), but they were less responsive for the timed up and go test (ΔPre vs ΔPost, −1.92 ± 2.06 vs −0.47 ± 1.15 seconds; P = 0.030) after Pilates intervention. There were no differences for the sit-to-stand test, rising from the floor, dress and undress T-shirt, handgrip strength, and balance variables.
Conclusion
Although the caffeine improved on the 10-m walk test and timed up and go test performance, healthy older adults were less responsive to caffeine after Pilates training only for performance on the timed up and go test.