{"title":"衡量卫生系统的改进能力:来自内容效度研究的结果。","authors":"Steve Meurer, Suzy Escalante","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurable improvements in the American Healthcare System have been elusive. To understand why, a survey measuring improvement capabilities in a health system was developed from a 2002 tool that measured an outdated quality improvement methodology. That survey was tested for content validity and achieved an overall representativeness content validity index of 87.5%. From the responses and discussions with the subject matter experts, 3 reasons emerged as to why a lack of improvement occurs in key metrics on a balanced scorecard. These 3 were the decentralization of improvement efforts, waning leadership attention, and presenting information rather than insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"39 6","pages":"261-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Improvement Capabilities in a Health System: Findings From a Content Validity Study.\",\"authors\":\"Steve Meurer, Suzy Escalante\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measurable improvements in the American Healthcare System have been elusive. To understand why, a survey measuring improvement capabilities in a health system was developed from a 2002 tool that measured an outdated quality improvement methodology. That survey was tested for content validity and achieved an overall representativeness content validity index of 87.5%. From the responses and discussions with the subject matter experts, 3 reasons emerged as to why a lack of improvement occurs in key metrics on a balanced scorecard. These 3 were the decentralization of improvement efforts, waning leadership attention, and presenting information rather than insights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"261-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring Improvement Capabilities in a Health System: Findings From a Content Validity Study.
Measurable improvements in the American Healthcare System have been elusive. To understand why, a survey measuring improvement capabilities in a health system was developed from a 2002 tool that measured an outdated quality improvement methodology. That survey was tested for content validity and achieved an overall representativeness content validity index of 87.5%. From the responses and discussions with the subject matter experts, 3 reasons emerged as to why a lack of improvement occurs in key metrics on a balanced scorecard. These 3 were the decentralization of improvement efforts, waning leadership attention, and presenting information rather than insights.