Hulya Y Ak, Kubra Taskin, Merve B Yediyildiz, Irem Durmus, Ozlem Sezen, Baris Sandal, Banu Cevik
{"title":"PECS-2和ESP在保乳手术中控制急慢性疼痛的比较分析。一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Hulya Y Ak, Kubra Taskin, Merve B Yediyildiz, Irem Durmus, Ozlem Sezen, Baris Sandal, Banu Cevik","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.24000223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Pectoral Nerve Block 2 (PECS-2) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP), which are accepted to have an effect on post-operative pain control after breast cancer surgery, on both acute and chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this double-blind, prospective, randomized study, patients were randomized using a sealed envelope method into two groups: those who underwent PECS-2 (Group P) and those who underwent ESP (Group E) before extubation at the end of the operation. The numerical rating scale (NRS) of patients was queried by a blinded researcher at post-operative 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. In addition, patients were queried for the presence of chronic pain at the 3rd month using NRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NRS scores at 1 h and 2 h in Group P were significantly lower compared to Group E. There was no significant difference in NRS scores at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h between the groups. The rate of chronic pain was similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study examining the effects of ESP and PECS-2 on acute and chronic pain after BCS due to breast cancer, PECS-2 was associated with less post-operative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of PECS-2 and ESP for acute and chronic pain control in breast-conserving surgery. A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Hulya Y Ak, Kubra Taskin, Merve B Yediyildiz, Irem Durmus, Ozlem Sezen, Baris Sandal, Banu Cevik\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.24000223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Pectoral Nerve Block 2 (PECS-2) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP), which are accepted to have an effect on post-operative pain control after breast cancer surgery, on both acute and chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this double-blind, prospective, randomized study, patients were randomized using a sealed envelope method into two groups: those who underwent PECS-2 (Group P) and those who underwent ESP (Group E) before extubation at the end of the operation. The numerical rating scale (NRS) of patients was queried by a blinded researcher at post-operative 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. In addition, patients were queried for the presence of chronic pain at the 3rd month using NRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NRS scores at 1 h and 2 h in Group P were significantly lower compared to Group E. There was no significant difference in NRS scores at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h between the groups. The rate of chronic pain was similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study examining the effects of ESP and PECS-2 on acute and chronic pain after BCS due to breast cancer, PECS-2 was associated with less post-operative pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.24000223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.24000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是比较胸神经阻滞2 (PECS-2)和竖棘平面阻滞(ESP)对乳腺癌手术后急性和慢性疼痛的控制效果。方法:在这项双盲、前瞻性、随机研究中,患者采用密封信封法随机分为两组:在手术结束拔管前进行PECS-2 (P组)和ESP (E组)。采用盲法研究者于术后1、2、6、12、24小时查询患者的数值评定量表(NRS),并在第3个月使用NRS询问患者是否存在慢性疼痛。结果:P组患者1 h、2 h NRS评分明显低于e组,6 h、12 h、24 h NRS评分组间差异无统计学意义。两组之间的慢性疼痛发生率相似。结论:本研究考察了ESP和PECS-2对乳腺癌BCS术后急性和慢性疼痛的影响,PECS-2与术后疼痛减轻有关。
Comparative analysis of PECS-2 and ESP for acute and chronic pain control in breast-conserving surgery. A prospective study.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Pectoral Nerve Block 2 (PECS-2) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESP), which are accepted to have an effect on post-operative pain control after breast cancer surgery, on both acute and chronic pain.
Method: In this double-blind, prospective, randomized study, patients were randomized using a sealed envelope method into two groups: those who underwent PECS-2 (Group P) and those who underwent ESP (Group E) before extubation at the end of the operation. The numerical rating scale (NRS) of patients was queried by a blinded researcher at post-operative 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. In addition, patients were queried for the presence of chronic pain at the 3rd month using NRS.
Results: The NRS scores at 1 h and 2 h in Group P were significantly lower compared to Group E. There was no significant difference in NRS scores at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h between the groups. The rate of chronic pain was similar between the groups.
Conclusion: In this study examining the effects of ESP and PECS-2 on acute and chronic pain after BCS due to breast cancer, PECS-2 was associated with less post-operative pain.