J Sam Meyer, Nancy Sweitzer, Dan Aravot, Carmelo A Milano, Yaron D Barac
{"title":"心脏移植生存和颅内出血供者的使用:器官共享登记联合网络倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"J Sam Meyer, Nancy Sweitzer, Dan Aravot, Carmelo A Milano, Yaron D Barac","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The transplantation of hearts from donors who experienced intracranial bleeding (ICB) has been associated with inferior long-term survival in both single-center analyses and, more recently, with the United Network for Ogan Sharing Registry. The purpose of this study was to further explore this relationship through propensity score matching in recipients receiving donor hearts from ICB and non-ICB donors in a large national registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network between 2006 and 2018 for adult candidates wait-listed for isolated heart transplantation. Recipients were stratified into 2 groups: ICB and non-ICB donors. Propensity score matching was performed to estimate causal effects by using observational data. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival posttransplant. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate the independent effect of ICB as a cause of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25,315 candidates met inclusion criteria. ICB heart donors (n = 5529) were older (median age, 42 vs 27 years; <i>P</i> < .001), less likely men (54.5% vs 75.2%; <i>P</i> < .001), and more often had a history of smoking (20.1% vs 11.7%; <i>P</i> < .001), and hypertension (34.2% vs 9.5%; <i>P</i> < .001). Before matching there was a significant difference in long-term posttransplant survival; for example, the non-ICB (60.7% [interquartile range, 59.5%-61.9%] vs 56.8% (interquartile range, 54.7%-59.0%]; <i>P</i> < .0001). However, when analyzing the propensity-score matched groups for outcomes, no difference was found between the cohorts both in terms of long-term survival as well as in rates of rejection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the largest propensity score matching analysis of heart transplants from donors who had experienced ICB, we found similar survival and rejection rates in heart transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"22 ","pages":"306-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart transplant survival and the use of donors with intracranial bleeding: United Network for Organ Sharing Registry propensity-score matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"J Sam Meyer, Nancy Sweitzer, Dan Aravot, Carmelo A Milano, Yaron D Barac\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The transplantation of hearts from donors who experienced intracranial bleeding (ICB) has been associated with inferior long-term survival in both single-center analyses and, more recently, with the United Network for Ogan Sharing Registry. The purpose of this study was to further explore this relationship through propensity score matching in recipients receiving donor hearts from ICB and non-ICB donors in a large national registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network between 2006 and 2018 for adult candidates wait-listed for isolated heart transplantation. Recipients were stratified into 2 groups: ICB and non-ICB donors. Propensity score matching was performed to estimate causal effects by using observational data. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival posttransplant. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate the independent effect of ICB as a cause of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25,315 candidates met inclusion criteria. ICB heart donors (n = 5529) were older (median age, 42 vs 27 years; <i>P</i> < .001), less likely men (54.5% vs 75.2%; <i>P</i> < .001), and more often had a history of smoking (20.1% vs 11.7%; <i>P</i> < .001), and hypertension (34.2% vs 9.5%; <i>P</i> < .001). Before matching there was a significant difference in long-term posttransplant survival; for example, the non-ICB (60.7% [interquartile range, 59.5%-61.9%] vs 56.8% (interquartile range, 54.7%-59.0%]; <i>P</i> < .0001). However, when analyzing the propensity-score matched groups for outcomes, no difference was found between the cohorts both in terms of long-term survival as well as in rates of rejection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the largest propensity score matching analysis of heart transplants from donors who had experienced ICB, we found similar survival and rejection rates in heart transplant recipients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"306-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在单中心分析和最近的器官共享登记联合网络中,来自颅内出血(ICB)供者的心脏移植与较差的长期生存率相关。本研究的目的是通过在一个大型国家登记处接受来自ICB和非ICB供体心脏的受者的倾向评分匹配来进一步探索这种关系。方法:我们对2006年至2018年器官共享登记联合网络(United Network for Organ Sharing Registry)器官获取和移植网络(Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network)中等待孤立心脏移植的成人候选人进行了回顾性队列分析。受者分为两组:ICB和非ICB供者。使用观察数据进行倾向评分匹配来估计因果效应。Kaplan-Meier分析用于估计移植后的生存。采用Cox比例风险模型评估ICB作为死亡原因的独立影响。结果:共有25315名候选人符合纳入标准。ICB心脏献血者(n = 5529)年龄较大(中位年龄42 vs 27岁;结论:在对经历过ICB的供者的心脏移植进行的最大倾向性评分匹配分析中,我们发现心脏移植受者的存活率和排异率相似。
Heart transplant survival and the use of donors with intracranial bleeding: United Network for Organ Sharing Registry propensity-score matched analysis.
Objective: The transplantation of hearts from donors who experienced intracranial bleeding (ICB) has been associated with inferior long-term survival in both single-center analyses and, more recently, with the United Network for Ogan Sharing Registry. The purpose of this study was to further explore this relationship through propensity score matching in recipients receiving donor hearts from ICB and non-ICB donors in a large national registry.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network between 2006 and 2018 for adult candidates wait-listed for isolated heart transplantation. Recipients were stratified into 2 groups: ICB and non-ICB donors. Propensity score matching was performed to estimate causal effects by using observational data. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival posttransplant. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate the independent effect of ICB as a cause of death.
Results: A total of 25,315 candidates met inclusion criteria. ICB heart donors (n = 5529) were older (median age, 42 vs 27 years; P < .001), less likely men (54.5% vs 75.2%; P < .001), and more often had a history of smoking (20.1% vs 11.7%; P < .001), and hypertension (34.2% vs 9.5%; P < .001). Before matching there was a significant difference in long-term posttransplant survival; for example, the non-ICB (60.7% [interquartile range, 59.5%-61.9%] vs 56.8% (interquartile range, 54.7%-59.0%]; P < .0001). However, when analyzing the propensity-score matched groups for outcomes, no difference was found between the cohorts both in terms of long-term survival as well as in rates of rejection.
Conclusions: In the largest propensity score matching analysis of heart transplants from donors who had experienced ICB, we found similar survival and rejection rates in heart transplant recipients.