教育策略是儿童康复实施研究中最常用的:范围审查。

Sahar Ghahramani, Sophia C Larson, Allison J L'Hotta, Kelly M Harris, Kim Lipsey, Elvin H Geng, Lisa A Juckett, Catherine R Hoyt
{"title":"教育策略是儿童康复实施研究中最常用的:范围审查。","authors":"Sahar Ghahramani, Sophia C Larson, Allison J L'Hotta, Kelly M Harris, Kim Lipsey, Elvin H Geng, Lisa A Juckett, Catherine R Hoyt","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00690-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately one in six children has a disability, and effective, evidence-based rehabilitation can ameliorate the impact of these conditions over the lifespan. However, implementing interventions in real-world settings remains a challenge. This scoping review aimed to summarize the characteristics, implementation strategies, and outcomes of implementation studies in pediatric rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from the database inception to December 2, 2022. Studies testing implementation strategies in pediatric rehabilitation interventions were included. Data extracted included study characteristics (e.g., country, intervention type, field of rehabilitation), implementation strategies characterized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and outcomes based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11,740 studies identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 15, 34%) or Canada (n = 10, 23%) and used a mixed-methods design (n = 13, 30%). Interventions primarily targeted motor skills (n = 19, 43%) and were conducted in outpatient settings (n = 14, 32%) or homes (n = 11, 23%). The most commonly used implementation strategies were \"train and educate key informant\" (n = 21, 48%) and \"use evaluative/iterative strategies\" (n = 19, 43%). Feasibility (n = 19, 43%) and acceptability (n = 16, 36%) were the most frequently targeted implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reporting implementation strategies and outcomes in pediatric rehabilitation studies is limited and highly variable. Most strategies focused on developing and sharing educational materials, while administrative and systems-level interventions were largely absent. Standardized documentation of implementation strategies and outcomes could advance the field's understanding of the effective development of interventions designed for implementation, encouraging faster uptake of effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education strategies are the most commonly used in pediatric rehabilitation implementation research: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Sahar Ghahramani, Sophia C Larson, Allison J L'Hotta, Kelly M Harris, Kim Lipsey, Elvin H Geng, Lisa A Juckett, Catherine R Hoyt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43058-024-00690-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately one in six children has a disability, and effective, evidence-based rehabilitation can ameliorate the impact of these conditions over the lifespan. However, implementing interventions in real-world settings remains a challenge. This scoping review aimed to summarize the characteristics, implementation strategies, and outcomes of implementation studies in pediatric rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from the database inception to December 2, 2022. Studies testing implementation strategies in pediatric rehabilitation interventions were included. Data extracted included study characteristics (e.g., country, intervention type, field of rehabilitation), implementation strategies characterized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and outcomes based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11,740 studies identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 15, 34%) or Canada (n = 10, 23%) and used a mixed-methods design (n = 13, 30%). Interventions primarily targeted motor skills (n = 19, 43%) and were conducted in outpatient settings (n = 14, 32%) or homes (n = 11, 23%). The most commonly used implementation strategies were \\\"train and educate key informant\\\" (n = 21, 48%) and \\\"use evaluative/iterative strategies\\\" (n = 19, 43%). Feasibility (n = 19, 43%) and acceptability (n = 16, 36%) were the most frequently targeted implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reporting implementation strategies and outcomes in pediatric rehabilitation studies is limited and highly variable. Most strategies focused on developing and sharing educational materials, while administrative and systems-level interventions were largely absent. Standardized documentation of implementation strategies and outcomes could advance the field's understanding of the effective development of interventions designed for implementation, encouraging faster uptake of effective interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00690-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00690-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大约六分之一的儿童患有残疾,有效的循证康复可以在一生中改善这些疾病的影响。然而,在现实环境中实施干预措施仍然是一个挑战。本综述旨在总结儿童康复实施研究的特点、实施策略和结果。方法:综合检索PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SCOPUS、Web of Science自建库至2022年12月2日的数据库。研究测试实施策略的儿童康复干预措施包括。提取的数据包括研究特征(如国家、干预类型、康复领域)、采用实施变革专家建议分类法表征的实施策略,以及基于实施成果框架的结果。结果:在11,740项研究中,有44项符合纳入标准。大多数研究在美国(n = 15,34 %)或加拿大(n = 10,23 %)进行,并采用混合方法设计(n = 13,30 %)。干预措施主要针对运动技能(n = 19, 43%),并在门诊环境(n = 14, 32%)或家庭(n = 11, 23%)进行。最常用的实施策略是“培训和教育关键线人”(n = 21, 48%)和“使用评估/迭代策略”(n = 19, 43%)。可行性(n = 19, 43%)和可接受性(n = 16, 36%)是最常见的目标实施结果。结论:报告儿童康复研究的实施策略和结果是有限和高度可变的。大多数战略的重点是编写和分享教育材料,而行政和系统一级的干预基本上没有。实施战略和成果的标准化文件可以促进实地对有效制定旨在实施的干预措施的理解,鼓励更快地采用有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education strategies are the most commonly used in pediatric rehabilitation implementation research: a scoping review.

Background: Approximately one in six children has a disability, and effective, evidence-based rehabilitation can ameliorate the impact of these conditions over the lifespan. However, implementing interventions in real-world settings remains a challenge. This scoping review aimed to summarize the characteristics, implementation strategies, and outcomes of implementation studies in pediatric rehabilitation.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from the database inception to December 2, 2022. Studies testing implementation strategies in pediatric rehabilitation interventions were included. Data extracted included study characteristics (e.g., country, intervention type, field of rehabilitation), implementation strategies characterized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and outcomes based on the Implementation Outcomes Framework.

Results: Of the 11,740 studies identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 15, 34%) or Canada (n = 10, 23%) and used a mixed-methods design (n = 13, 30%). Interventions primarily targeted motor skills (n = 19, 43%) and were conducted in outpatient settings (n = 14, 32%) or homes (n = 11, 23%). The most commonly used implementation strategies were "train and educate key informant" (n = 21, 48%) and "use evaluative/iterative strategies" (n = 19, 43%). Feasibility (n = 19, 43%) and acceptability (n = 16, 36%) were the most frequently targeted implementation outcomes.

Conclusions: Reporting implementation strategies and outcomes in pediatric rehabilitation studies is limited and highly variable. Most strategies focused on developing and sharing educational materials, while administrative and systems-level interventions were largely absent. Standardized documentation of implementation strategies and outcomes could advance the field's understanding of the effective development of interventions designed for implementation, encouraging faster uptake of effective interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信