食物即药,社区即药:社会关怀干预对心理健康的影响。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Dorothy T Chiu, Denise Ruvalcaba, Wei-Ting Chen, June Tester, Lan Xiao, Benjamin O Emmert-Aronson, Steven Chen, Lisa G Rosas
{"title":"食物即药,社区即药:社会关怀干预对心理健康的影响。","authors":"Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Dorothy T Chiu, Denise Ruvalcaba, Wei-Ting Chen, June Tester, Lan Xiao, Benjamin O Emmert-Aronson, Steven Chen, Lisa G Rosas","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess mental health related outcomes of Recipe4Health, a multisectoral social care partnership implementing produce prescriptions with or without group medical visits (GMVs).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Recipe4Health was implemented at five community health centers from 2020 to 2023. Primary care teams referred patients with food insecurity and/or nutrition-sensitive chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, depression) to 16 weeks of Food Farmacy (produce prescriptions) with the option of GMV participation. We used a convergent mixed-methods design including survey and interview data.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We conducted (1) participant surveys pre- and post-intervention and (2) semi-structured interviews with Recipe4Health participants and partner organization staff. Linear mixed effects models examined changes in mental health and related outcomes. Interviews were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Program participants were middle-aged, primarily women, and from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds (majority Latine and Black). At baseline, moderate or severe depression and/or anxiety symptoms were reported by 77/188 (41%) of Food Farmacy-only participants, and 113/284 (40%) of Food Farmacy +GMV participants. Among Food Farmacy-only participants, post-intervention depression and anxiety symptoms significantly improved only among those who did not have baseline depression/anxiety (PHQ9: -1.7 [95% CI: -2.8, -0.6]; GAD7: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.9, -0.8]). Among Food Farmacy +GMV participants, mental health symptoms improved regardless of baseline mental health; among those with baseline depression/anxiety: PHQ9: -2.4 (95% CI: -3.6, -1.2); GAD7: -0.9 (95% CI: -2.0, 0.1); among those without: PHQ9: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.2, -1.2); GAD7: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.1, -1.2). Improvements in social needs (food insecurity, loneliness) and health-related behaviors (fruit/vegetable intake, physical activity) varied by intervention arm and baseline depression/anxiety symptom level. In interviews, staff and patients endorsed produce prescriptions for improving nutrition and food insecurity, and GMVs for increasing social support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social care interventions providing vegetables and fruit, with or without group medical visits, may concurrently address mental health symptoms and social needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14431"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food as medicine, community as medicine: Mental health effects of a social care intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Dorothy T Chiu, Denise Ruvalcaba, Wei-Ting Chen, June Tester, Lan Xiao, Benjamin O Emmert-Aronson, Steven Chen, Lisa G Rosas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess mental health related outcomes of Recipe4Health, a multisectoral social care partnership implementing produce prescriptions with or without group medical visits (GMVs).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>Recipe4Health was implemented at five community health centers from 2020 to 2023. Primary care teams referred patients with food insecurity and/or nutrition-sensitive chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, depression) to 16 weeks of Food Farmacy (produce prescriptions) with the option of GMV participation. We used a convergent mixed-methods design including survey and interview data.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We conducted (1) participant surveys pre- and post-intervention and (2) semi-structured interviews with Recipe4Health participants and partner organization staff. Linear mixed effects models examined changes in mental health and related outcomes. Interviews were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Program participants were middle-aged, primarily women, and from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds (majority Latine and Black). At baseline, moderate or severe depression and/or anxiety symptoms were reported by 77/188 (41%) of Food Farmacy-only participants, and 113/284 (40%) of Food Farmacy +GMV participants. Among Food Farmacy-only participants, post-intervention depression and anxiety symptoms significantly improved only among those who did not have baseline depression/anxiety (PHQ9: -1.7 [95% CI: -2.8, -0.6]; GAD7: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.9, -0.8]). Among Food Farmacy +GMV participants, mental health symptoms improved regardless of baseline mental health; among those with baseline depression/anxiety: PHQ9: -2.4 (95% CI: -3.6, -1.2); GAD7: -0.9 (95% CI: -2.0, 0.1); among those without: PHQ9: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.2, -1.2); GAD7: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.1, -1.2). Improvements in social needs (food insecurity, loneliness) and health-related behaviors (fruit/vegetable intake, physical activity) varied by intervention arm and baseline depression/anxiety symptom level. In interviews, staff and patients endorsed produce prescriptions for improving nutrition and food insecurity, and GMVs for increasing social support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social care interventions providing vegetables and fruit, with or without group medical visits, may concurrently address mental health symptoms and social needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14431\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估Recipe4Health的心理健康相关结果,Recipe4Health是一个多部门社会保健伙伴关系,实施有或没有团体医疗访问(gmv)的生产处方。研究设置与设计:2020 - 2023年,在5个社区卫生中心实施Recipe4Health。初级保健团队将患有粮食不安全和/或营养敏感慢性病(如糖尿病、抑郁症)的患者转介到16周的食品农场(生产处方),并选择GMV参与。我们采用融合混合方法设计,包括调查和访谈数据。数据来源和分析样本:我们进行了(1)干预前后的参与者调查和(2)对Recipe4Health参与者和合作伙伴组织工作人员的半结构化访谈。线性混合效应模型检验了心理健康和相关结果的变化。访谈采用代码本专题分析进行分析。主要发现:项目参与者是中年人,主要是女性,来自不同的种族/民族背景(大多数是拉丁裔和黑人)。基线时,77/188(41%)的Food farm +GMV参与者报告了中度或重度抑郁和/或焦虑症状,113/284(40%)的Food farm +GMV参与者报告了中度或重度抑郁和/或焦虑症状。仅在Food farm的参与者中,干预后抑郁和焦虑症状仅在没有基线抑郁/焦虑的参与者中显著改善(PHQ9: -1.7 [95% CI: -2.8, -0.6];Gad7: -1.8 [95% ci: -2.9, -0.8])。在食品农场+GMV参与者中,无论基线心理健康状况如何,心理健康症状都有所改善;基线抑郁/焦虑患者:PHQ9: -2.4 (95% CI: -3.6, -1.2);Gad7: -0.9 (95% ci: -2.0, 0.1);无PHQ9组:-2.2 (95% CI: -3.2, -1.2);Gad7: -2.2 (95% ci: -3.1, -1.2)。社会需求(食物不安全、孤独感)和健康相关行为(水果/蔬菜摄入量、身体活动)的改善因干预组和基线抑郁/焦虑症状水平而异。在采访中,工作人员和患者为改善营养和粮食不安全开出处方,为增加社会支持开出gmv。结论:社会关怀干预提供蔬菜和水果,有或没有团体医疗访问,可以同时解决心理健康症状和社会需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food as medicine, community as medicine: Mental health effects of a social care intervention.

Objective: To assess mental health related outcomes of Recipe4Health, a multisectoral social care partnership implementing produce prescriptions with or without group medical visits (GMVs).

Study setting and design: Recipe4Health was implemented at five community health centers from 2020 to 2023. Primary care teams referred patients with food insecurity and/or nutrition-sensitive chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, depression) to 16 weeks of Food Farmacy (produce prescriptions) with the option of GMV participation. We used a convergent mixed-methods design including survey and interview data.

Data sources and analytic sample: We conducted (1) participant surveys pre- and post-intervention and (2) semi-structured interviews with Recipe4Health participants and partner organization staff. Linear mixed effects models examined changes in mental health and related outcomes. Interviews were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.

Principal findings: Program participants were middle-aged, primarily women, and from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds (majority Latine and Black). At baseline, moderate or severe depression and/or anxiety symptoms were reported by 77/188 (41%) of Food Farmacy-only participants, and 113/284 (40%) of Food Farmacy +GMV participants. Among Food Farmacy-only participants, post-intervention depression and anxiety symptoms significantly improved only among those who did not have baseline depression/anxiety (PHQ9: -1.7 [95% CI: -2.8, -0.6]; GAD7: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.9, -0.8]). Among Food Farmacy +GMV participants, mental health symptoms improved regardless of baseline mental health; among those with baseline depression/anxiety: PHQ9: -2.4 (95% CI: -3.6, -1.2); GAD7: -0.9 (95% CI: -2.0, 0.1); among those without: PHQ9: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.2, -1.2); GAD7: -2.2 (95% CI: -3.1, -1.2). Improvements in social needs (food insecurity, loneliness) and health-related behaviors (fruit/vegetable intake, physical activity) varied by intervention arm and baseline depression/anxiety symptom level. In interviews, staff and patients endorsed produce prescriptions for improving nutrition and food insecurity, and GMVs for increasing social support.

Conclusion: Social care interventions providing vegetables and fruit, with or without group medical visits, may concurrently address mental health symptoms and social needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信