护理、助产和联合健康专业人员在医疗保健研究中的主要研究者角色的能力和能力:一项全国性调查。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Heather Jarman, Suzanne Bench, Teresa Melody, Sarah Brand, Julie C Menzies, Linda Tinkler, Karen Kemp, Sharon Dorgan, Catherine Henshall
{"title":"护理、助产和联合健康专业人员在医疗保健研究中的主要研究者角色的能力和能力:一项全国性调查。","authors":"Heather Jarman, Suzanne Bench, Teresa Melody, Sarah Brand, Julie C Menzies, Linda Tinkler, Karen Kemp, Sharon Dorgan, Catherine Henshall","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To understand the current capacity and capability for nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) principal investigator roles in England.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online national quantitative survey across England analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of NMAHP PIs in an organisation was unrelated to the size of the NMAHP workforce. NMAHP PIs were more common in non-CTIMP studies. A quarter of organisations had no specific education or support for NMAHP PIs. Most respondents indicated that a national approach to support and training would be helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having more research-active NMAHPs provides career progression, improved staff retention and improves the evidence base for practice. Having a broader range of CI/PIs allows for more targeted and specialty-specific oversight of research studies and streamlines the acceptance process to allow research to be delivered in a more timely manner.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This will require more collaboration between NMAHP, medical and industry communities to promote a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare research delivery and to ensure that CI/PI roles are fulfilled by the most appropriate person, regardless of their profession.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>To ascertain NMAHP capacity and capability for PI research roles. Shows where national and organisational effort should be focused to increase this nationally.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Cross reporting guidance for survey studies was utilised.</p><p><strong>Patient contribution: </strong>No patient or patient contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capacity and Capability for Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Principal Investigator Roles in Healthcare Research: A National Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Jarman, Suzanne Bench, Teresa Melody, Sarah Brand, Julie C Menzies, Linda Tinkler, Karen Kemp, Sharon Dorgan, Catherine Henshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To understand the current capacity and capability for nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) principal investigator roles in England.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online national quantitative survey across England analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of NMAHP PIs in an organisation was unrelated to the size of the NMAHP workforce. NMAHP PIs were more common in non-CTIMP studies. A quarter of organisations had no specific education or support for NMAHP PIs. Most respondents indicated that a national approach to support and training would be helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having more research-active NMAHPs provides career progression, improved staff retention and improves the evidence base for practice. Having a broader range of CI/PIs allows for more targeted and specialty-specific oversight of research studies and streamlines the acceptance process to allow research to be delivered in a more timely manner.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This will require more collaboration between NMAHP, medical and industry communities to promote a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare research delivery and to ensure that CI/PI roles are fulfilled by the most appropriate person, regardless of their profession.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>To ascertain NMAHP capacity and capability for PI research roles. Shows where national and organisational effort should be focused to increase this nationally.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Cross reporting guidance for survey studies was utilised.</p><p><strong>Patient contribution: </strong>No patient or patient contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17628\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解目前的能力和护理,助产和专职卫生专业(NMAHP)的主要研究者在英国的角色。设计:定量在线调查。方法:采用描述性统计方法对英国全国在线定量调查进行分析。结果:一个组织中NMAHP pi的数量与NMAHP劳动力的规模无关。NMAHP pi在非ctimp研究中更为常见。四分之一的组织没有为NMAHP pi提供专门的教育或支持。大多数答复者表示,国家支助和培训办法将会有所帮助。结论:拥有更多的研究活跃的nmahp提供了职业发展,提高了员工保留率,并改善了实践的证据基础。拥有更广泛的CI/ pi范围,可以对研究进行更有针对性和专门的监督,并简化接受过程,从而使研究能够更及时地交付。对实践的影响:这将需要NMAHP、医疗和行业社区之间进行更多的合作,以促进医疗保健研究交付的多学科方法,并确保CI/PI角色由最合适的人履行,而不管他们的职业是什么。影响:确定NMAHP能力和PI研究角色的能力。显示了国家和组织应集中努力的地方,以便在全国范围内提高这一水平。报告方法:采用调查研究交叉报告指南。患者贡献:无患者贡献或患者贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capacity and Capability for Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Principal Investigator Roles in Healthcare Research: A National Survey.

Aims: To understand the current capacity and capability for nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) principal investigator roles in England.

Design: Quantitative online survey.

Methods: Online national quantitative survey across England analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The number of NMAHP PIs in an organisation was unrelated to the size of the NMAHP workforce. NMAHP PIs were more common in non-CTIMP studies. A quarter of organisations had no specific education or support for NMAHP PIs. Most respondents indicated that a national approach to support and training would be helpful.

Conclusions: Having more research-active NMAHPs provides career progression, improved staff retention and improves the evidence base for practice. Having a broader range of CI/PIs allows for more targeted and specialty-specific oversight of research studies and streamlines the acceptance process to allow research to be delivered in a more timely manner.

Implications for practice: This will require more collaboration between NMAHP, medical and industry communities to promote a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare research delivery and to ensure that CI/PI roles are fulfilled by the most appropriate person, regardless of their profession.

Impact: To ascertain NMAHP capacity and capability for PI research roles. Shows where national and organisational effort should be focused to increase this nationally.

Reporting method: Cross reporting guidance for survey studies was utilised.

Patient contribution: No patient or patient contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信