Heather Jarman, Suzanne Bench, Teresa Melody, Sarah Brand, Julie C Menzies, Linda Tinkler, Karen Kemp, Sharon Dorgan, Catherine Henshall
{"title":"护理、助产和联合健康专业人员在医疗保健研究中的主要研究者角色的能力和能力:一项全国性调查。","authors":"Heather Jarman, Suzanne Bench, Teresa Melody, Sarah Brand, Julie C Menzies, Linda Tinkler, Karen Kemp, Sharon Dorgan, Catherine Henshall","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To understand the current capacity and capability for nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) principal investigator roles in England.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online national quantitative survey across England analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of NMAHP PIs in an organisation was unrelated to the size of the NMAHP workforce. NMAHP PIs were more common in non-CTIMP studies. A quarter of organisations had no specific education or support for NMAHP PIs. Most respondents indicated that a national approach to support and training would be helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having more research-active NMAHPs provides career progression, improved staff retention and improves the evidence base for practice. Having a broader range of CI/PIs allows for more targeted and specialty-specific oversight of research studies and streamlines the acceptance process to allow research to be delivered in a more timely manner.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This will require more collaboration between NMAHP, medical and industry communities to promote a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare research delivery and to ensure that CI/PI roles are fulfilled by the most appropriate person, regardless of their profession.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>To ascertain NMAHP capacity and capability for PI research roles. Shows where national and organisational effort should be focused to increase this nationally.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Cross reporting guidance for survey studies was utilised.</p><p><strong>Patient contribution: </strong>No patient or patient contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capacity and Capability for Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Principal Investigator Roles in Healthcare Research: A National Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Jarman, Suzanne Bench, Teresa Melody, Sarah Brand, Julie C Menzies, Linda Tinkler, Karen Kemp, Sharon Dorgan, Catherine Henshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To understand the current capacity and capability for nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) principal investigator roles in England.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online national quantitative survey across England analysed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of NMAHP PIs in an organisation was unrelated to the size of the NMAHP workforce. NMAHP PIs were more common in non-CTIMP studies. A quarter of organisations had no specific education or support for NMAHP PIs. Most respondents indicated that a national approach to support and training would be helpful.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Having more research-active NMAHPs provides career progression, improved staff retention and improves the evidence base for practice. Having a broader range of CI/PIs allows for more targeted and specialty-specific oversight of research studies and streamlines the acceptance process to allow research to be delivered in a more timely manner.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This will require more collaboration between NMAHP, medical and industry communities to promote a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare research delivery and to ensure that CI/PI roles are fulfilled by the most appropriate person, regardless of their profession.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>To ascertain NMAHP capacity and capability for PI research roles. Shows where national and organisational effort should be focused to increase this nationally.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Cross reporting guidance for survey studies was utilised.</p><p><strong>Patient contribution: </strong>No patient or patient contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17628\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Capacity and Capability for Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professional Principal Investigator Roles in Healthcare Research: A National Survey.
Aims: To understand the current capacity and capability for nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) principal investigator roles in England.
Design: Quantitative online survey.
Methods: Online national quantitative survey across England analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results: The number of NMAHP PIs in an organisation was unrelated to the size of the NMAHP workforce. NMAHP PIs were more common in non-CTIMP studies. A quarter of organisations had no specific education or support for NMAHP PIs. Most respondents indicated that a national approach to support and training would be helpful.
Conclusions: Having more research-active NMAHPs provides career progression, improved staff retention and improves the evidence base for practice. Having a broader range of CI/PIs allows for more targeted and specialty-specific oversight of research studies and streamlines the acceptance process to allow research to be delivered in a more timely manner.
Implications for practice: This will require more collaboration between NMAHP, medical and industry communities to promote a multidisciplinary approach to healthcare research delivery and to ensure that CI/PI roles are fulfilled by the most appropriate person, regardless of their profession.
Impact: To ascertain NMAHP capacity and capability for PI research roles. Shows where national and organisational effort should be focused to increase this nationally.
Reporting method: Cross reporting guidance for survey studies was utilised.
Patient contribution: No patient or patient contribution.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.