Carolina Chavez, Kelly Lin, Alexis Malveaux, Aleksandr Gorin, Stefanie Brizuela, Quen J. Cheng, Alexander Hoffmann
{"title":"IRF1与ISGF3或GAF协同在巨噬细胞中形成先天免疫新生增强因子。","authors":"Carolina Chavez, Kelly Lin, Alexis Malveaux, Aleksandr Gorin, Stefanie Brizuela, Quen J. Cheng, Alexander Hoffmann","doi":"10.1126/scisignal.ado8860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Macrophages exposed to immune stimuli reprogram their epigenomes to alter their subsequent functions. Exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) causes widespread nucleosome remodeling and the formation of thousands of de novo enhancers. We dissected the regulatory logic by which the network of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) induces the opening of chromatin and the formation of de novo enhancers. We found that LPS-activated IRF3 mediated de novo enhancer formation indirectly by activating the type I interferon (IFN)–induced ISGF3. However, ISGF3 was generally needed to collaborate with IRF1, particularly where chromatin was less accessible. At these locations, IRF1 was required for the initial opening of chromatin, with ISGF3 extending accessibility and promoting the deposition of H3K4me1, marking poised enhancers. Because <i>IRF1</i> expression depends on the transcription factor NF-κB, which is activated in infected but not bystander cells, IRF-regulated enhancers required activation of both the IRF3 and NF-κB branches of the innate immune signaling network. However, type II IFN (IFN-γ), which is typically produced by T cells, may also induce <i>IRF1</i> expression through the STAT1 homodimer GAF. We showed that, upon IFN-γ stimulation, IRF1 was also responsible for opening inaccessible chromatin sites that could then be exploited by GAF to form de novo enhancers. Together, our results reveal how combinatorial logic gates of IRF1-ISGF3 or IRF1-GAF restrict immune epigenomic memory formation to macrophages exposed to pathogens or IFN-γ–secreting T cells but not bystander macrophages exposed transiently to type I IFN.</div>","PeriodicalId":21658,"journal":{"name":"Science Signaling","volume":"18 868","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IRF1 cooperates with ISGF3 or GAF to form innate immune de novo enhancers in macrophages\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Chavez, Kelly Lin, Alexis Malveaux, Aleksandr Gorin, Stefanie Brizuela, Quen J. Cheng, Alexander Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1126/scisignal.ado8860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div >Macrophages exposed to immune stimuli reprogram their epigenomes to alter their subsequent functions. Exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) causes widespread nucleosome remodeling and the formation of thousands of de novo enhancers. We dissected the regulatory logic by which the network of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) induces the opening of chromatin and the formation of de novo enhancers. We found that LPS-activated IRF3 mediated de novo enhancer formation indirectly by activating the type I interferon (IFN)–induced ISGF3. However, ISGF3 was generally needed to collaborate with IRF1, particularly where chromatin was less accessible. At these locations, IRF1 was required for the initial opening of chromatin, with ISGF3 extending accessibility and promoting the deposition of H3K4me1, marking poised enhancers. Because <i>IRF1</i> expression depends on the transcription factor NF-κB, which is activated in infected but not bystander cells, IRF-regulated enhancers required activation of both the IRF3 and NF-κB branches of the innate immune signaling network. However, type II IFN (IFN-γ), which is typically produced by T cells, may also induce <i>IRF1</i> expression through the STAT1 homodimer GAF. We showed that, upon IFN-γ stimulation, IRF1 was also responsible for opening inaccessible chromatin sites that could then be exploited by GAF to form de novo enhancers. Together, our results reveal how combinatorial logic gates of IRF1-ISGF3 or IRF1-GAF restrict immune epigenomic memory formation to macrophages exposed to pathogens or IFN-γ–secreting T cells but not bystander macrophages exposed transiently to type I IFN.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Signaling\",\"volume\":\"18 868\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Signaling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scisignal.ado8860\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Signaling","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scisignal.ado8860","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
IRF1 cooperates with ISGF3 or GAF to form innate immune de novo enhancers in macrophages
Macrophages exposed to immune stimuli reprogram their epigenomes to alter their subsequent functions. Exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) causes widespread nucleosome remodeling and the formation of thousands of de novo enhancers. We dissected the regulatory logic by which the network of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) induces the opening of chromatin and the formation of de novo enhancers. We found that LPS-activated IRF3 mediated de novo enhancer formation indirectly by activating the type I interferon (IFN)–induced ISGF3. However, ISGF3 was generally needed to collaborate with IRF1, particularly where chromatin was less accessible. At these locations, IRF1 was required for the initial opening of chromatin, with ISGF3 extending accessibility and promoting the deposition of H3K4me1, marking poised enhancers. Because IRF1 expression depends on the transcription factor NF-κB, which is activated in infected but not bystander cells, IRF-regulated enhancers required activation of both the IRF3 and NF-κB branches of the innate immune signaling network. However, type II IFN (IFN-γ), which is typically produced by T cells, may also induce IRF1 expression through the STAT1 homodimer GAF. We showed that, upon IFN-γ stimulation, IRF1 was also responsible for opening inaccessible chromatin sites that could then be exploited by GAF to form de novo enhancers. Together, our results reveal how combinatorial logic gates of IRF1-ISGF3 or IRF1-GAF restrict immune epigenomic memory formation to macrophages exposed to pathogens or IFN-γ–secreting T cells but not bystander macrophages exposed transiently to type I IFN.
期刊介绍:
"Science Signaling" is a reputable, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the exploration of cell communication mechanisms, offering a comprehensive view of the intricate processes that govern cellular regulation. This journal, published weekly online by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), is a go-to resource for the latest research in cell signaling and its various facets.
The journal's scope encompasses a broad range of topics, including the study of signaling networks, synthetic biology, systems biology, and the application of these findings in drug discovery. It also delves into the computational and modeling aspects of regulatory pathways, providing insights into how cells communicate and respond to their environment.
In addition to publishing full-length articles that report on groundbreaking research, "Science Signaling" also features reviews that synthesize current knowledge in the field, focus articles that highlight specific areas of interest, and editor-written highlights that draw attention to particularly significant studies. This mix of content ensures that the journal serves as a valuable resource for both researchers and professionals looking to stay abreast of the latest advancements in cell communication science.