一项随机对照试验:护士主导的使用移动应用程序的支持计划与护士电话建议对有冠心病风险的患者的影响

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Eliza M L Wong, Doris Y P Leung, Simon C Lam, Lorna K P Suen, Anson C Y Tang, Shuk Y Ko, Angela Y M Leung
{"title":"一项随机对照试验:护士主导的使用移动应用程序的支持计划与护士电话建议对有冠心病风险的患者的影响","authors":"Eliza M L Wong, Doris Y P Leung, Simon C Lam, Lorna K P Suen, Anson C Y Tang, Shuk Y Ko, Angela Y M Leung","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major health problem of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease and early intervention is regarded important. Given the proven effect of a lifestyle intervention with nursing telephone counselling and mHealth use in health care, yet the comparisons of both support are lacking, this study is proposed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of a coronary artery disease (CAD) support program using a mobile application versus nurse phone advice on exercise amount and physical and psychological outcomes for clients at risk of CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Ethical approval was obtained. Two-hundred and twenty-six clients were screened, and a total of 168 clients who were at risk of CAD and routinely used smartphones were randomized into the app support group (App group) or the nurse phone advice (NPA) group. Although all participants received the same health talk delivered by a cardiac nurse at the community center, the App group received additional CAD app support, whereas the NPA group received nurse phone advice for 20 min monthly. The app content comprised (1) CAD knowledge in 10 modules, (2) individual exercise records with their own goals and health measures, and (3) a chest pain action list. The intervention lasted for 3 months. Health outcome data were collected at baseline (T0) and after 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months. The outcomes were the total amount of exercise (primary outcome), self-efficacy in illness management, perceived stress, and CAD risk profile (body weight, body mass index, and lipid concentration). Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess differential changes in all outcomes within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The attrition rates at 3 months were 3.49% and 9.30% for the App and NPA groups, respectively. The App support group was superior to the NPA group in significantly increasing total exercise amount and reducing body weight, waist circumference, triglycerides, and increased self-efficacy in illness management.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>The result provides further insights of app development to support health promotion programs for community-dwelling adults at risk of CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":"22 1","pages":"e12765"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a Nurse-Led Support Program Using Mobile Application Versus Nurse Phone Advice on Patients at Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Eliza M L Wong, Doris Y P Leung, Simon C Lam, Lorna K P Suen, Anson C Y Tang, Shuk Y Ko, Angela Y M Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wvn.12765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major health problem of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease and early intervention is regarded important. Given the proven effect of a lifestyle intervention with nursing telephone counselling and mHealth use in health care, yet the comparisons of both support are lacking, this study is proposed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of a coronary artery disease (CAD) support program using a mobile application versus nurse phone advice on exercise amount and physical and psychological outcomes for clients at risk of CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Ethical approval was obtained. Two-hundred and twenty-six clients were screened, and a total of 168 clients who were at risk of CAD and routinely used smartphones were randomized into the app support group (App group) or the nurse phone advice (NPA) group. Although all participants received the same health talk delivered by a cardiac nurse at the community center, the App group received additional CAD app support, whereas the NPA group received nurse phone advice for 20 min monthly. The app content comprised (1) CAD knowledge in 10 modules, (2) individual exercise records with their own goals and health measures, and (3) a chest pain action list. The intervention lasted for 3 months. Health outcome data were collected at baseline (T0) and after 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months. The outcomes were the total amount of exercise (primary outcome), self-efficacy in illness management, perceived stress, and CAD risk profile (body weight, body mass index, and lipid concentration). Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess differential changes in all outcomes within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The attrition rates at 3 months were 3.49% and 9.30% for the App and NPA groups, respectively. The App support group was superior to the NPA group in significantly increasing total exercise amount and reducing body weight, waist circumference, triglycerides, and increased self-efficacy in illness management.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>The result provides further insights of app development to support health promotion programs for community-dwelling adults at risk of CAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"e12765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12765\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(CV)的主要健康问题,早期干预非常重要。鉴于生活方式干预与护理电话咨询和在医疗保健中使用移动健康的效果已得到证实,但缺乏对这两种支持的比较,因此提出了这项研究。目的:本研究旨在比较使用移动应用程序的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)支持程序与护士电话建议对冠心病风险客户的运动量和生理和心理结果的影响。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照试验。获得伦理批准。筛选了226名客户,共有168名有CAD风险且经常使用智能手机的客户被随机分为应用程序支持组(app组)或护士电话建议组(NPA)。虽然所有参与者都在社区中心接受了由心脏病护士提供的相同健康讲座,但App组接受了额外的CAD应用程序支持,而NPA组每月接受20分钟的护士电话建议。应用程序内容包括(1)CAD知识的10个模块,(2)个人运动记录与自己的目标和健康措施,以及(3)胸痛的行动清单。干预期为3个月。在基线(T0)、1个月(T1)和3个月(T2)后收集健康结局数据。结果包括运动总量(主要结果)、疾病管理的自我效能、感知压力和CAD风险概况(体重、体重指数和脂质浓度)。使用广义估计方程模型评估3个月内所有结局的差异变化。结果:App组和NPA组3个月的损耗率分别为3.49%和9.30%。App支持组在显著增加总运动量、降低体重、腰围、甘油三酯和提高疾病管理自我效能方面优于NPA组。将证据与行动联系起来:该结果为应用程序开发提供了进一步的见解,以支持有CAD风险的社区居住成年人的健康促进计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of a Nurse-Led Support Program Using Mobile Application Versus Nurse Phone Advice on Patients at Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major health problem of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease and early intervention is regarded important. Given the proven effect of a lifestyle intervention with nursing telephone counselling and mHealth use in health care, yet the comparisons of both support are lacking, this study is proposed.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of a coronary artery disease (CAD) support program using a mobile application versus nurse phone advice on exercise amount and physical and psychological outcomes for clients at risk of CAD.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Ethical approval was obtained. Two-hundred and twenty-six clients were screened, and a total of 168 clients who were at risk of CAD and routinely used smartphones were randomized into the app support group (App group) or the nurse phone advice (NPA) group. Although all participants received the same health talk delivered by a cardiac nurse at the community center, the App group received additional CAD app support, whereas the NPA group received nurse phone advice for 20 min monthly. The app content comprised (1) CAD knowledge in 10 modules, (2) individual exercise records with their own goals and health measures, and (3) a chest pain action list. The intervention lasted for 3 months. Health outcome data were collected at baseline (T0) and after 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months. The outcomes were the total amount of exercise (primary outcome), self-efficacy in illness management, perceived stress, and CAD risk profile (body weight, body mass index, and lipid concentration). Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess differential changes in all outcomes within 3 months.

Results: The attrition rates at 3 months were 3.49% and 9.30% for the App and NPA groups, respectively. The App support group was superior to the NPA group in significantly increasing total exercise amount and reducing body weight, waist circumference, triglycerides, and increased self-efficacy in illness management.

Linking evidence to action: The result provides further insights of app development to support health promotion programs for community-dwelling adults at risk of CAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信