机动车碰撞后的解脱:代表爱丁堡皇家外科医学院院前护理学院的共识声明。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Tim Nutbeam, Rob Fenwick, Charlotte Haldane, Caroline Leech, Emily Foote, Simon Todd, David Lockey
{"title":"机动车碰撞后的解脱:代表爱丁堡皇家外科医学院院前护理学院的共识声明。","authors":"Tim Nutbeam, Rob Fenwick, Charlotte Haldane, Caroline Leech, Emily Foote, Simon Todd, David Lockey","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01312-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Road traffic injury is the leading cause of death among young people globally, with motor vehicle collisions often resulting in severe injuries and entrapment. Traditional extrication techniques focus on limiting movement to prevent spinal cord injuries, but recent findings from the EXIT project challenge this approach. This paper presents updated recommendations from the Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care (FPHC) that reflect the latest evidence on extrication practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review identified 170 relevant articles from 7083 records. Findings, together with EXIT project data, informed the development of 12 core and supplemental statements on extrication. In April 2024, 43 subject matter experts from diverse backgrounds participated in a consensus process. Statements were discussed, voted on, and synthesised into the updated statement, ratified by FPHC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was achieved for all 12 statements, emphasising self-extrication as a preferred, primary approach, reducing extrication time, and moving away from absolute movement minimisation. The U-STEP OUT algorithm was endorsed as a decision-making tool. Key themes included interdisciplinary collaboration, use of operational and clinical decision aids, and enhanced training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus statement marks a paradigm shift in extrication practice, moving away from traditional movement minimisation to a focus on time-sensitive, patient-centred care. The findings advocate for empowering both clinical and non-clinical responders and improving interdisciplinary training and communication. Further research is needed to assess the broader implementation of this statement and to explore the psychological impacts of entrapment and extrication on patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extrication following a motor vehicle collision: a consensus statement on behalf of The Faculty of Pre-hospital Care, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Nutbeam, Rob Fenwick, Charlotte Haldane, Caroline Leech, Emily Foote, Simon Todd, David Lockey\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-024-01312-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Road traffic injury is the leading cause of death among young people globally, with motor vehicle collisions often resulting in severe injuries and entrapment. Traditional extrication techniques focus on limiting movement to prevent spinal cord injuries, but recent findings from the EXIT project challenge this approach. This paper presents updated recommendations from the Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care (FPHC) that reflect the latest evidence on extrication practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review identified 170 relevant articles from 7083 records. Findings, together with EXIT project data, informed the development of 12 core and supplemental statements on extrication. In April 2024, 43 subject matter experts from diverse backgrounds participated in a consensus process. Statements were discussed, voted on, and synthesised into the updated statement, ratified by FPHC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was achieved for all 12 statements, emphasising self-extrication as a preferred, primary approach, reducing extrication time, and moving away from absolute movement minimisation. The U-STEP OUT algorithm was endorsed as a decision-making tool. Key themes included interdisciplinary collaboration, use of operational and clinical decision aids, and enhanced training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus statement marks a paradigm shift in extrication practice, moving away from traditional movement minimisation to a focus on time-sensitive, patient-centred care. The findings advocate for empowering both clinical and non-clinical responders and improving interdisciplinary training and communication. Further research is needed to assess the broader implementation of this statement and to explore the psychological impacts of entrapment and extrication on patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01312-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01312-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:道路交通伤害是全球年轻人死亡的主要原因,机动车辆碰撞往往造成严重伤害和被困。传统的解脱技术侧重于限制活动以防止脊髓损伤,但最近来自EXIT项目的研究结果对这种方法提出了挑战。本文提出了最新的建议,从院前护理学院(FPHC),反映了最新的证据,对解脱的做法。方法:对7083份记录中的170篇相关文章进行系统的范围评估。调查结果连同EXIT项目数据为制定关于解脱的12项核心和补充说明提供了信息。2024年4月,来自不同背景的43名主题专家参与了共识进程。对各项声明进行了讨论、表决,并综合成经FPHC批准的订正声明。结果:所有12种说法都达成了共识,强调自我解脱是首选的、主要的方法,减少了解脱时间,远离了绝对的运动最小化。U-STEP OUT算法被认可为一种决策工具。关键主题包括跨学科合作、使用操作和临床决策辅助工具以及加强培训。结论:这一共识声明标志着解脱实践的范式转变,从传统的运动最小化转移到关注时间敏感,以患者为中心的护理。研究结果提倡增强临床和非临床反应者的能力,并改善跨学科的培训和交流。需要进一步的研究来评估这一说法的更广泛实施,并探讨对患者的心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extrication following a motor vehicle collision: a consensus statement on behalf of The Faculty of Pre-hospital Care, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

Background: Road traffic injury is the leading cause of death among young people globally, with motor vehicle collisions often resulting in severe injuries and entrapment. Traditional extrication techniques focus on limiting movement to prevent spinal cord injuries, but recent findings from the EXIT project challenge this approach. This paper presents updated recommendations from the Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care (FPHC) that reflect the latest evidence on extrication practices.

Methods: A systematic scoping review identified 170 relevant articles from 7083 records. Findings, together with EXIT project data, informed the development of 12 core and supplemental statements on extrication. In April 2024, 43 subject matter experts from diverse backgrounds participated in a consensus process. Statements were discussed, voted on, and synthesised into the updated statement, ratified by FPHC.

Results: Consensus was achieved for all 12 statements, emphasising self-extrication as a preferred, primary approach, reducing extrication time, and moving away from absolute movement minimisation. The U-STEP OUT algorithm was endorsed as a decision-making tool. Key themes included interdisciplinary collaboration, use of operational and clinical decision aids, and enhanced training.

Conclusions: This consensus statement marks a paradigm shift in extrication practice, moving away from traditional movement minimisation to a focus on time-sensitive, patient-centred care. The findings advocate for empowering both clinical and non-clinical responders and improving interdisciplinary training and communication. Further research is needed to assess the broader implementation of this statement and to explore the psychological impacts of entrapment and extrication on patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信