迈向提供者构建成熟度模型,授权临床医生积极参与电子健康记录设计。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Wayne Liang, Jeffrey Hoffman, Lia McNeely, Stephon N Proctor, Evan Orenstein
{"title":"迈向提供者构建成熟度模型,授权临床医生积极参与电子健康记录设计。","authors":"Wayne Liang, Jeffrey Hoffman, Lia McNeely, Stephon N Proctor, Evan Orenstein","doi":"10.1055/a-2512-9647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Engagement of clinicians who understand clinical workflows and technology constraints can accelerate the development and implementation of better electronic health record (EHR) designs that improve quality and reduce burnout. Provider builder programs can accelerate clinical informatics education for a broader coalition of clinical specialties.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this State of the Art / Best Practice paper, we aim to (1) propose a provider builder maturity model informed by the experience of three institutions using a single EHR vendor (Epic Systems©) and (2) describe the program elements and relationships necessary to advance along this model to yield organizational benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified version of the Glaser State-of-the-Art approach, gathering consensus among a small group of experts at institutions with successful provider builder programs. The model was updated through meetings with a larger group of experts and then feedback from presentation at national conferences and the American Medical Informatics Association's Maturity Model Working Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final maturity model describes the characteristics and suggested next steps beginning from Planting the Seed (Stage 0) and progressing through Lone Wolves (Stage 1), a Community of Builders (Stage 2), Organizational Structure (Stage 3), a Council of Builders (Stage 4), and Informatics in the Room Where it Happens (Stage 5). We also describe the journeys of 3 organizations through these stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A provider builder maturity model can help guide organizations on their journey engaging clinicians in collaborative EHR design to promote quality and safety and reduce burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Provider Builder Maturity Model to Empower Clinicians to Actively Participate in Electronic Health Record Design.\",\"authors\":\"Wayne Liang, Jeffrey Hoffman, Lia McNeely, Stephon N Proctor, Evan Orenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2512-9647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Engagement of clinicians who understand clinical workflows and technology constraints can accelerate the development and implementation of better electronic health record (EHR) designs that improve quality and reduce burnout. Provider builder programs can accelerate clinical informatics education for a broader coalition of clinical specialties.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this State of the Art / Best Practice paper, we aim to (1) propose a provider builder maturity model informed by the experience of three institutions using a single EHR vendor (Epic Systems©) and (2) describe the program elements and relationships necessary to advance along this model to yield organizational benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified version of the Glaser State-of-the-Art approach, gathering consensus among a small group of experts at institutions with successful provider builder programs. The model was updated through meetings with a larger group of experts and then feedback from presentation at national conferences and the American Medical Informatics Association's Maturity Model Working Group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final maturity model describes the characteristics and suggested next steps beginning from Planting the Seed (Stage 0) and progressing through Lone Wolves (Stage 1), a Community of Builders (Stage 2), Organizational Structure (Stage 3), a Council of Builders (Stage 4), and Informatics in the Room Where it Happens (Stage 5). We also describe the journeys of 3 organizations through these stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A provider builder maturity model can help guide organizations on their journey engaging clinicians in collaborative EHR design to promote quality and safety and reduce burnout.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2512-9647\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2512-9647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解临床工作流程和技术限制的临床医生的参与可以加速更好的电子健康记录(EHR)设计的开发和实施,从而提高质量并减少倦怠。提供者构建程序可以加速临床信息学教育的临床专业更广泛的联盟。目标:在这篇最新技术/最佳实践论文中,我们的目标是(1)根据三家机构使用单一EHR供应商(Epic Systems©)的经验,提出一个供应商构建者成熟度模型;(2)描述沿着该模型推进以产生组织效益所需的项目元素和关系。方法:我们使用了格拉泽最先进方法的改进版本,在具有成功提供者构建程序的机构的一小群专家中收集共识。该模型是通过与更大的专家小组的会议,然后从国家会议和美国医学信息学协会成熟度模型工作组的报告中得到反馈而更新的。结果:最终的成熟度模型描述了从播种(阶段0)到孤狼(阶段1)、建设者社区(阶段2)、组织结构(阶段3)、建设者委员会(阶段4)和发生事件的房间中的信息学(阶段5)的特征和建议的下一步。我们还描述了三个组织在这些阶段的旅程。结论:提供者构建者成熟度模型可以帮助组织引导临床医生参与协同电子病历设计,以提高质量和安全性,减少倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a Provider Builder Maturity Model to Empower Clinicians to Actively Participate in Electronic Health Record Design.

Background: Engagement of clinicians who understand clinical workflows and technology constraints can accelerate the development and implementation of better electronic health record (EHR) designs that improve quality and reduce burnout. Provider builder programs can accelerate clinical informatics education for a broader coalition of clinical specialties.

Objective: In this State of the Art / Best Practice paper, we aim to (1) propose a provider builder maturity model informed by the experience of three institutions using a single EHR vendor (Epic Systems©) and (2) describe the program elements and relationships necessary to advance along this model to yield organizational benefits.

Methods: We used a modified version of the Glaser State-of-the-Art approach, gathering consensus among a small group of experts at institutions with successful provider builder programs. The model was updated through meetings with a larger group of experts and then feedback from presentation at national conferences and the American Medical Informatics Association's Maturity Model Working Group.

Results: The final maturity model describes the characteristics and suggested next steps beginning from Planting the Seed (Stage 0) and progressing through Lone Wolves (Stage 1), a Community of Builders (Stage 2), Organizational Structure (Stage 3), a Council of Builders (Stage 4), and Informatics in the Room Where it Happens (Stage 5). We also describe the journeys of 3 organizations through these stages.

Conclusions: A provider builder maturity model can help guide organizations on their journey engaging clinicians in collaborative EHR design to promote quality and safety and reduce burnout.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信