中风后创伤后生长:一项纵向观察研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Bettina K Doering, Anna Künemund, Sarah Zwick, Jana Hansmeier, Cornelia Exner, Dirk Lubbe
{"title":"中风后创伤后生长:一项纵向观察研究。","authors":"Bettina K Doering, Anna Künemund, Sarah Zwick, Jana Hansmeier, Cornelia Exner, Dirk Lubbe","doi":"10.1037/rep0000600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>This study investigated the development of posttraumatic growth (PTG) in relatively young persons with stroke. It examined the contribution of potential predictive variables and their changes over time.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (<i>n</i> = 78, median time since injury = 47 days) and 3 (<i>n</i> = 53) and 6 months (<i>n</i> = 47) later. Each assessment included the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, the COPE Inventory, and the Centrality of Event Scale. Data were analyzed using a sequence of linear mixed effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PTG was evident at baseline, but did not significantly increase over time. Higher event centrality, approach-oriented coping, and lower coping flexibility at baseline were associated with higher PTG 6 months later. Higher coping flexibility at baseline and an increase in event centrality were associated with a more positive trend in PTG over time. The final model explained 67% of variance in PTG. Time since injury, age, gender, social support seeking, and avoidance coping did not contribute significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Individual changes in the predictors contributed to high and stable PTG. How central the stroke was perceived to one's identity was the most important predictor for the absolute level of PTG as well as its change over time. This illustrates the complex and dynamic development of PTG. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posttraumatic growth after stroke: A longitudinal observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Bettina K Doering, Anna Künemund, Sarah Zwick, Jana Hansmeier, Cornelia Exner, Dirk Lubbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/rep0000600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>This study investigated the development of posttraumatic growth (PTG) in relatively young persons with stroke. It examined the contribution of potential predictive variables and their changes over time.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (<i>n</i> = 78, median time since injury = 47 days) and 3 (<i>n</i> = 53) and 6 months (<i>n</i> = 47) later. Each assessment included the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, the COPE Inventory, and the Centrality of Event Scale. Data were analyzed using a sequence of linear mixed effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PTG was evident at baseline, but did not significantly increase over time. Higher event centrality, approach-oriented coping, and lower coping flexibility at baseline were associated with higher PTG 6 months later. Higher coping flexibility at baseline and an increase in event centrality were associated with a more positive trend in PTG over time. The final model explained 67% of variance in PTG. Time since injury, age, gender, social support seeking, and avoidance coping did not contribute significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Individual changes in the predictors contributed to high and stable PTG. How central the stroke was perceived to one's identity was the most important predictor for the absolute level of PTG as well as its change over time. This illustrates the complex and dynamic development of PTG. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000600\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目的:本研究探讨相对年轻的脑卒中患者创伤后生长(PTG)的发展。它考察了潜在预测变量的贡献及其随时间的变化。研究方法/设计:参与者在基线(n = 78,中位受伤时间= 47天)、3个月(n = 53)和6个月(n = 47)后完成问卷调查。每项评估包括创伤后成长量表、COPE量表和事件中心性量表。使用一系列线性混合效应模型对数据进行分析。结果:PTG在基线时很明显,但随着时间的推移没有显著增加。基线时较高的事件中心性、方法导向的应对和较低的应对灵活性与6个月后较高的PTG相关。随着时间的推移,较高的基线应对灵活性和事件中心性的增加与更积极的PTG趋势相关。最终模型解释了PTG 67%的方差。自受伤时间、年龄、性别、社会支持寻求和回避应对无显著影响。结论/意义:预测因子的个体变化有助于高且稳定的PTG。对于PTG的绝对水平及其随时间的变化来说,中风对一个人身份的中心感知程度是最重要的预测因素。这说明了PTG发展的复杂性和动态性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posttraumatic growth after stroke: A longitudinal observational study.

Purpose/objective: This study investigated the development of posttraumatic growth (PTG) in relatively young persons with stroke. It examined the contribution of potential predictive variables and their changes over time.

Research method/design: Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (n = 78, median time since injury = 47 days) and 3 (n = 53) and 6 months (n = 47) later. Each assessment included the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, the COPE Inventory, and the Centrality of Event Scale. Data were analyzed using a sequence of linear mixed effect models.

Results: PTG was evident at baseline, but did not significantly increase over time. Higher event centrality, approach-oriented coping, and lower coping flexibility at baseline were associated with higher PTG 6 months later. Higher coping flexibility at baseline and an increase in event centrality were associated with a more positive trend in PTG over time. The final model explained 67% of variance in PTG. Time since injury, age, gender, social support seeking, and avoidance coping did not contribute significantly.

Conclusion/implications: Individual changes in the predictors contributed to high and stable PTG. How central the stroke was perceived to one's identity was the most important predictor for the absolute level of PTG as well as its change over time. This illustrates the complex and dynamic development of PTG. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信