澳大利亚大学生改善健康行为以获得最佳心理健康的研究重点:双面板德尔菲研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Melinda J Hutchesson, Robert Stanton, Natalie Johnson, Rohan Francis-Taylor, Tracy Burrows, Daniel B Fassnacht, Louise M Farrer
{"title":"澳大利亚大学生改善健康行为以获得最佳心理健康的研究重点:双面板德尔菲研究","authors":"Melinda J Hutchesson, Robert Stanton, Natalie Johnson, Rohan Francis-Taylor, Tracy Burrows, Daniel B Fassnacht, Louise M Farrer","doi":"10.1002/hpja.948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issue addressed: </strong>University students are at risk of poor health behaviours which negatively affect mental health and wellbeing. Informing the implementation of appropriate strategies to support Australian university students' health and wellbeing, requires quality evidence. This study aimed to identify research priorities for improving health behaviours to optimise mental health of Australian university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A twin-panel Delphi method comprising 32 experts across two panels (Panel 1: n = 24, Panel 2; n = 8), with three rounds of data collection, was utilised. In round one panellists identified up to five research priorities. Identified priorities were grouped into themes and in Round 2 panellists ranked their panels priorities using a 4-point Likert scale (1 irrelevant, 2 peripheral, 3 important, 4 essential), and in Round 3 they ranked the importance of the priorities identified by the other panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Panel 1 identified 35 research priorities in Round 1, and Panel 2 identified 11. Priorities were ranked based on the mean score, with strong, between-panel agreement in the rankings for Panel 1's priorities. (r<sub>s</sub> = .68, p < .001) but not Panel 2 (r<sub>s</sub> = .32, p = .34). A list of 25 priorities was retained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Priorities were derived from experts and provided a further call to action for research targeting suicide prevention, social determinants, co-design, behaviour change, and the effectiveness and accessibility of services. SO WHAT?: With further input from students, universities and other stakeholders, these research priorities can guide research to optimise health behaviours and mental health of Australian university students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 1","pages":"e948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priorities for research on improving health behaviours for optimal mental health of Australian university students: A twin-panel Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Melinda J Hutchesson, Robert Stanton, Natalie Johnson, Rohan Francis-Taylor, Tracy Burrows, Daniel B Fassnacht, Louise M Farrer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Issue addressed: </strong>University students are at risk of poor health behaviours which negatively affect mental health and wellbeing. Informing the implementation of appropriate strategies to support Australian university students' health and wellbeing, requires quality evidence. This study aimed to identify research priorities for improving health behaviours to optimise mental health of Australian university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A twin-panel Delphi method comprising 32 experts across two panels (Panel 1: n = 24, Panel 2; n = 8), with three rounds of data collection, was utilised. In round one panellists identified up to five research priorities. Identified priorities were grouped into themes and in Round 2 panellists ranked their panels priorities using a 4-point Likert scale (1 irrelevant, 2 peripheral, 3 important, 4 essential), and in Round 3 they ranked the importance of the priorities identified by the other panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Panel 1 identified 35 research priorities in Round 1, and Panel 2 identified 11. Priorities were ranked based on the mean score, with strong, between-panel agreement in the rankings for Panel 1's priorities. (r<sub>s</sub> = .68, p < .001) but not Panel 2 (r<sub>s</sub> = .32, p = .34). A list of 25 priorities was retained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Priorities were derived from experts and provided a further call to action for research targeting suicide prevention, social determinants, co-design, behaviour change, and the effectiveness and accessibility of services. SO WHAT?: With further input from students, universities and other stakeholders, these research priorities can guide research to optimise health behaviours and mental health of Australian university students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"e948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.948\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所处理的问题:大学生面临不良健康行为的风险,这些行为对心理健康和福祉产生负面影响。为实施支持澳大利亚大学生健康和福祉的适当战略提供信息,需要高质量的证据。本研究旨在确定改善健康行为的研究重点,以优化澳大利亚大学生的心理健康。方法:采用双面板德尔菲法,包括32位专家横跨两个面板(面板1:n = 24,面板2;N = 8),采用三轮数据收集。在第一轮中,小组成员确定了最多五个研究重点。确定的优先事项被分组到主题中,在第二轮中,小组成员使用4点李克特量表(1不相关,2外围,3重要,4基本)对他们的小组优先事项进行排名,在第三轮中,他们对其他小组确定的优先事项的重要性进行排名。结果:第1小组确定了第1轮的35个研究重点,第2小组确定了11个。根据平均得分对优先事项进行排名,小组1优先事项的排名在小组间具有很强的一致性。(rs =;68, p s =。32, p = .34)。保留了一份25项优先事项的清单。结论:专家得出了优先事项,并进一步呼吁针对自杀预防、社会决定因素、共同设计、行为改变以及服务的有效性和可及性进行研究。那又怎样?在学生、大学和其他利益相关者的进一步投入下,这些研究重点可以指导研究,以优化澳大利亚大学生的健康行为和心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Priorities for research on improving health behaviours for optimal mental health of Australian university students: A twin-panel Delphi study.

Issue addressed: University students are at risk of poor health behaviours which negatively affect mental health and wellbeing. Informing the implementation of appropriate strategies to support Australian university students' health and wellbeing, requires quality evidence. This study aimed to identify research priorities for improving health behaviours to optimise mental health of Australian university students.

Methods: A twin-panel Delphi method comprising 32 experts across two panels (Panel 1: n = 24, Panel 2; n = 8), with three rounds of data collection, was utilised. In round one panellists identified up to five research priorities. Identified priorities were grouped into themes and in Round 2 panellists ranked their panels priorities using a 4-point Likert scale (1 irrelevant, 2 peripheral, 3 important, 4 essential), and in Round 3 they ranked the importance of the priorities identified by the other panel.

Results: Panel 1 identified 35 research priorities in Round 1, and Panel 2 identified 11. Priorities were ranked based on the mean score, with strong, between-panel agreement in the rankings for Panel 1's priorities. (rs = .68, p < .001) but not Panel 2 (rs = .32, p = .34). A list of 25 priorities was retained.

Conclusions: Priorities were derived from experts and provided a further call to action for research targeting suicide prevention, social determinants, co-design, behaviour change, and the effectiveness and accessibility of services. SO WHAT?: With further input from students, universities and other stakeholders, these research priorities can guide research to optimise health behaviours and mental health of Australian university students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信