注射更严格的监管:TGA打击化妆品注射广告的影响。

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Christopher Rudge, Cameron Stewart
{"title":"注射更严格的监管:TGA打击化妆品注射广告的影响。","authors":"Christopher Rudge, Cameron Stewart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) updated its guidance on cosmetic injectables advertising. The updates confirm that all direct or indirect advertising of cosmetic injectable products, including botulinum toxins or dermal fillers, is prohibited in Australia. While some commentators have lamented these updates, they present no changes to the law. As cosmetic injectables are prescription-only medicines, they have long been subject to the statutory prohibition on direct-to-consumer advertising of medicines in Australia. The updates, however, signal a real change to the TGA's enforcement stance and attitude. In this way, the updated guidance illustrates the practical application of the TGA's responsive and risk-based approach to regulation - a focus of this column. The changes also bring into view some of the emerging dangers associated with cosmetic injectables and related cosmetic treatments. This column explores the regulation of cosmetic injectables, the TGA's changing approach, and its implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"31 3","pages":"464-482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injecting Tighter Regulation: Implications of the TGA's Clampdown on Cosmetic Injectables Advertising.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Rudge, Cameron Stewart\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) updated its guidance on cosmetic injectables advertising. The updates confirm that all direct or indirect advertising of cosmetic injectable products, including botulinum toxins or dermal fillers, is prohibited in Australia. While some commentators have lamented these updates, they present no changes to the law. As cosmetic injectables are prescription-only medicines, they have long been subject to the statutory prohibition on direct-to-consumer advertising of medicines in Australia. The updates, however, signal a real change to the TGA's enforcement stance and attitude. In this way, the updated guidance illustrates the practical application of the TGA's responsive and risk-based approach to regulation - a focus of this column. The changes also bring into view some of the emerging dangers associated with cosmetic injectables and related cosmetic treatments. This column explores the regulation of cosmetic injectables, the TGA's changing approach, and its implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"464-482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,美国药品管理局(TGA)更新了其关于注射化妆品广告的指导。最新消息证实,在澳大利亚,包括肉毒杆菌毒素或皮肤填充剂在内的所有化妆品注射产品的直接或间接广告都是禁止的。虽然一些评论员对这些更新表示遗憾,但它们并没有对法律做出任何改变。由于化妆品注射剂是处方药,它们长期以来一直受到法律禁止直接面向消费者的药品广告的限制。然而,这些更新标志着TGA的执法立场和态度发生了真正的变化。通过这种方式,更新的指南说明了TGA的响应性和基于风险的监管方法的实际应用-这是本专栏的重点。这些变化也使人们认识到与美容注射剂和相关美容治疗有关的一些新出现的危险。本专栏探讨了化妆品注射剂的监管,TGA不断变化的方法及其含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Injecting Tighter Regulation: Implications of the TGA's Clampdown on Cosmetic Injectables Advertising.

Recently, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) updated its guidance on cosmetic injectables advertising. The updates confirm that all direct or indirect advertising of cosmetic injectable products, including botulinum toxins or dermal fillers, is prohibited in Australia. While some commentators have lamented these updates, they present no changes to the law. As cosmetic injectables are prescription-only medicines, they have long been subject to the statutory prohibition on direct-to-consumer advertising of medicines in Australia. The updates, however, signal a real change to the TGA's enforcement stance and attitude. In this way, the updated guidance illustrates the practical application of the TGA's responsive and risk-based approach to regulation - a focus of this column. The changes also bring into view some of the emerging dangers associated with cosmetic injectables and related cosmetic treatments. This column explores the regulation of cosmetic injectables, the TGA's changing approach, and its implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信