Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Chang Hyun Doh, Hui Ben, Ji Yeon Park, Kyoung-Hwan Koh, Hangsik Shin, In-Ho Jeon
{"title":"基于摄影的人工智能骨科医生水平关节角度评估:一项试点研究。","authors":"Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Chang Hyun Doh, Hui Ben, Ji Yeon Park, Kyoung-Hwan Koh, Hangsik Shin, In-Ho Jeon","doi":"10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating patient progress. Traditional manual goniometry often lacks precision and is subject to inter-observer variability, especially in measuring shoulder internal rotation (IR). This study introduces an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach that uses clinical photography to improve the accuracy of ROM quantification. We analyzed a total of 150 clinical photographs, including 100 shoulder and 50 elbow images, taken between January and April 2022. An MMPose model with an HR-NET backbone architecture, pre-trained on the COCO-WholeBody dataset, was used to detect 17 anatomical landmarks. A random forest classifier (PoseRF) then categorized poses, and ROM angles were calculated. Concurrently, two clinicians independently measured shoulder IR at the vertebral level, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to correlate the AI-derived measurements with the clinicians' assessments. The AI-based algorithm accurately detected anatomical landmarks in 96% of shoulder and 100% of elbow images. Pose detection achieved 95% accuracy overall, with 100% accuracy for specific shoulder (abduction, flexion, external rotation) and elbow (flexion, extension) poses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the AI algorithm and human observers ranged from 0.965 to 0.997, indicating excellent inter-observer reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences in ROM measurements among the AI algorithm and two human observers across all joint angles (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The AI-based algorithm demonstrated performance comparable to that of human observers in quantifying shoulder and elbow ROM from clinical photographs. For shoulder internal rotation, the AI approach showed potential for improved consistency compared to traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 1","pages":"131-142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthopedic surgeon level joint angle assessment with artificial intelligence based on photography: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Chang Hyun Doh, Hui Ben, Ji Yeon Park, Kyoung-Hwan Koh, Hangsik Shin, In-Ho Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating patient progress. Traditional manual goniometry often lacks precision and is subject to inter-observer variability, especially in measuring shoulder internal rotation (IR). This study introduces an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach that uses clinical photography to improve the accuracy of ROM quantification. We analyzed a total of 150 clinical photographs, including 100 shoulder and 50 elbow images, taken between January and April 2022. An MMPose model with an HR-NET backbone architecture, pre-trained on the COCO-WholeBody dataset, was used to detect 17 anatomical landmarks. A random forest classifier (PoseRF) then categorized poses, and ROM angles were calculated. Concurrently, two clinicians independently measured shoulder IR at the vertebral level, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to correlate the AI-derived measurements with the clinicians' assessments. The AI-based algorithm accurately detected anatomical landmarks in 96% of shoulder and 100% of elbow images. Pose detection achieved 95% accuracy overall, with 100% accuracy for specific shoulder (abduction, flexion, external rotation) and elbow (flexion, extension) poses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the AI algorithm and human observers ranged from 0.965 to 0.997, indicating excellent inter-observer reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences in ROM measurements among the AI algorithm and two human observers across all joint angles (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The AI-based algorithm demonstrated performance comparable to that of human observers in quantifying shoulder and elbow ROM from clinical photographs. For shoulder internal rotation, the AI approach showed potential for improved consistency compared to traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"131-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Orthopedic surgeon level joint angle assessment with artificial intelligence based on photography: a pilot study.
Accurate assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating patient progress. Traditional manual goniometry often lacks precision and is subject to inter-observer variability, especially in measuring shoulder internal rotation (IR). This study introduces an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach that uses clinical photography to improve the accuracy of ROM quantification. We analyzed a total of 150 clinical photographs, including 100 shoulder and 50 elbow images, taken between January and April 2022. An MMPose model with an HR-NET backbone architecture, pre-trained on the COCO-WholeBody dataset, was used to detect 17 anatomical landmarks. A random forest classifier (PoseRF) then categorized poses, and ROM angles were calculated. Concurrently, two clinicians independently measured shoulder IR at the vertebral level, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to correlate the AI-derived measurements with the clinicians' assessments. The AI-based algorithm accurately detected anatomical landmarks in 96% of shoulder and 100% of elbow images. Pose detection achieved 95% accuracy overall, with 100% accuracy for specific shoulder (abduction, flexion, external rotation) and elbow (flexion, extension) poses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the AI algorithm and human observers ranged from 0.965 to 0.997, indicating excellent inter-observer reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences in ROM measurements among the AI algorithm and two human observers across all joint angles (p > 0.05). The AI-based algorithm demonstrated performance comparable to that of human observers in quantifying shoulder and elbow ROM from clinical photographs. For shoulder internal rotation, the AI approach showed potential for improved consistency compared to traditional methods.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.