{"title":"胃肠病学研究中的合作网络:合作作者网络分析(2000-2023)。","authors":"Naruaki Ogasawara","doi":"10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the co-authorship network in Gastroenterology research, focusing on publications from 2000 to 2023, to understand the collaborative relationships among researchers and identify key contributors in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), I examined 18,855 Gastroenterology-related articles published between 2000 and 2023. The analysis was conducted using Python within the PyCharm environment. I assessed the network at both macro and micro levels. Macro-level indicators included network density, clustering coefficient, components, and average path length. Micro-level indicators included degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, which helped identify influential researchers and research groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed an evolution from a fragmented and sparsely connected network in the early 2000s to a more interconnected structure in recent years. Despite the overall increase in network density and clustering, full integration was not achieved, with many researchers remaining in isolated clusters. Key researchers such as Gasbarrini G., Vandenplas Y., and Hassan C. were identified as central figures within the network, playing crucial roles in fostering collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the ongoing development of collaborative networks in Gastroenterology research, identifying influential researchers and groups that drive advancements in the field. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing future research collaborations, particularly in areas where Japan excels, such as endoscopic technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":35671,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","volume":"61 ","pages":"e24083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH: A CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK ANALYSIS (2000-2023).\",\"authors\":\"Naruaki Ogasawara\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the co-authorship network in Gastroenterology research, focusing on publications from 2000 to 2023, to understand the collaborative relationships among researchers and identify key contributors in the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), I examined 18,855 Gastroenterology-related articles published between 2000 and 2023. The analysis was conducted using Python within the PyCharm environment. I assessed the network at both macro and micro levels. Macro-level indicators included network density, clustering coefficient, components, and average path length. Micro-level indicators included degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, which helped identify influential researchers and research groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed an evolution from a fragmented and sparsely connected network in the early 2000s to a more interconnected structure in recent years. Despite the overall increase in network density and clustering, full integration was not achieved, with many researchers remaining in isolated clusters. Key researchers such as Gasbarrini G., Vandenplas Y., and Hassan C. were identified as central figures within the network, playing crucial roles in fostering collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the ongoing development of collaborative networks in Gastroenterology research, identifying influential researchers and groups that drive advancements in the field. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing future research collaborations, particularly in areas where Japan excels, such as endoscopic technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"e24083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.24612024-083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在分析胃肠病学研究的合著者网络,重点分析2000年至2023年发表的论文,了解研究人员之间的合作关系,并确定该领域的关键贡献者。方法:使用来自Web of Science (WoS)的数据,我检查了2000年至2023年间发表的18855篇胃肠病学相关文章。分析是在PyCharm环境中使用Python进行的。我从宏观和微观两个层面对网络进行了评估。宏观指标包括网络密度、聚类系数、成分、平均路径长度等。微观层面的指标包括度中心性、接近中心性和中间中心性,这些指标有助于确定有影响力的研究人员和研究小组。结果:分析表明,从21世纪初的碎片化和稀疏连接的网络到近年来更加相互关联的结构的演变。尽管网络密度和聚类总体上有所增加,但没有实现完全的整合,许多研究人员仍然处于孤立的集群中。Gasbarrini G.、Vandenplas Y.和Hassan C.等关键研究人员被认为是网络中的核心人物,在促进合作方面发挥着关键作用。结论:该研究突出了胃肠病学研究中协作网络的持续发展,确定了推动该领域进步的有影响力的研究人员和团体。这些发现为加强未来的研究合作提供了有价值的见解,特别是在日本擅长的领域,如内窥镜技术。
COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH: A CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORK ANALYSIS (2000-2023).
Background: This study aims to analyze the co-authorship network in Gastroenterology research, focusing on publications from 2000 to 2023, to understand the collaborative relationships among researchers and identify key contributors in the field.
Methods: Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), I examined 18,855 Gastroenterology-related articles published between 2000 and 2023. The analysis was conducted using Python within the PyCharm environment. I assessed the network at both macro and micro levels. Macro-level indicators included network density, clustering coefficient, components, and average path length. Micro-level indicators included degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, which helped identify influential researchers and research groups.
Results: The analysis revealed an evolution from a fragmented and sparsely connected network in the early 2000s to a more interconnected structure in recent years. Despite the overall increase in network density and clustering, full integration was not achieved, with many researchers remaining in isolated clusters. Key researchers such as Gasbarrini G., Vandenplas Y., and Hassan C. were identified as central figures within the network, playing crucial roles in fostering collaboration.
Conclusion: The study highlights the ongoing development of collaborative networks in Gastroenterology research, identifying influential researchers and groups that drive advancements in the field. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing future research collaborations, particularly in areas where Japan excels, such as endoscopic technology.
期刊介绍:
The journal Arquivos de Gastroenterologia (Archives of Gastroenterology), a quarterly journal, is the Official Publication of the Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia IBEPEGE (Brazilian Institute for Studies and Research in Gastroenterology), Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD (Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery) and of the Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD (Brazilian Digestive Motility Society). It is dedicated to the publishing of scientific papers by national and foreign researchers who are in agreement with the aim of the journal as well as with its editorial policies.