Sarah M Baxter, Lars Christian Lund, Jacob H Andersen, Thomas H Brix, Laszlo Hegedüs, Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh, Chris Tzu-Ting Su, Michael Chun-Yuan Cheng, Zoe Chi-Jui Chang, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Swaleh Hussain, Cherry Chu, Tara Gomes, Tony Antoniou, Antoine Eskander, Zachary Bouck, Mina Tadrous, Sungho Bea, Eun-Young Choi, Ju-Young Shin, Karin Modig, Mats Talbäck, Rickard Ljung, Hanne Løvdal Gulseth, Øystein Karlstad, Blánaid Hicks, Anton Pottegård
{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂与甲状腺癌的风险:一项国际多地点队列研究。","authors":"Sarah M Baxter, Lars Christian Lund, Jacob H Andersen, Thomas H Brix, Laszlo Hegedüs, Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh, Chris Tzu-Ting Su, Michael Chun-Yuan Cheng, Zoe Chi-Jui Chang, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Swaleh Hussain, Cherry Chu, Tara Gomes, Tony Antoniou, Antoine Eskander, Zachary Bouck, Mina Tadrous, Sungho Bea, Eun-Young Choi, Ju-Young Shin, Karin Modig, Mats Talbäck, Rickard Ljung, Hanne Løvdal Gulseth, Øystein Karlstad, Blánaid Hicks, Anton Pottegård","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Concerns have been raised that glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) may increase the risk of thyroid cancer, but evidence remains conflicting. We therefore investigated if GLP1-RA use, compared with use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), was associated with thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multisite cohort study with subsequent meta-analysis included six population-based databases from Canada (Ontario), Denmark, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan. Study populations comprised patients with type 2 diabetes between 2007 and 2023. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for thyroid cancer among GLP1-RA users compared with DPP-4is. Models were weighted using standardized mortality ratio weights generated from time-specific propensity scores. Site-specific HRs were pooled using a fixed-effects model. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 98,147 users of GLP1-RA and 2,488,303 users of DPP-4i, with the median follow-up among users of GLP1-RA ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years. Overall, use of GLP1-RA relative to use of DPP-4i was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer (pooled weighted HR 0.81, CI 0.59-1.12). Similarly, we observed no increased risk in thyroid cancer with increasing cumulative dose of GLP1-RA among GLP1-RA ever-users. Subgroup analysis of types of thyroid cancer was not possible. Results remained consistent across a range of supplementary analyses. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> In this large multisite study, utilizing data from six population-based databases, we found no evidence that GLP1-RA use is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer with follow-up ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years, providing some reassurance to patients and clinicians about the short-term safety of these drugs. Nevertheless, evidence was insufficient to rule out excess risk with long-term use, due to the short follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"69-78"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: An International Multisite Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M Baxter, Lars Christian Lund, Jacob H Andersen, Thomas H Brix, Laszlo Hegedüs, Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh, Chris Tzu-Ting Su, Michael Chun-Yuan Cheng, Zoe Chi-Jui Chang, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Swaleh Hussain, Cherry Chu, Tara Gomes, Tony Antoniou, Antoine Eskander, Zachary Bouck, Mina Tadrous, Sungho Bea, Eun-Young Choi, Ju-Young Shin, Karin Modig, Mats Talbäck, Rickard Ljung, Hanne Løvdal Gulseth, Øystein Karlstad, Blánaid Hicks, Anton Pottegård\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/thy.2024.0387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Concerns have been raised that glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) may increase the risk of thyroid cancer, but evidence remains conflicting. We therefore investigated if GLP1-RA use, compared with use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), was associated with thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multisite cohort study with subsequent meta-analysis included six population-based databases from Canada (Ontario), Denmark, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan. Study populations comprised patients with type 2 diabetes between 2007 and 2023. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for thyroid cancer among GLP1-RA users compared with DPP-4is. Models were weighted using standardized mortality ratio weights generated from time-specific propensity scores. Site-specific HRs were pooled using a fixed-effects model. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 98,147 users of GLP1-RA and 2,488,303 users of DPP-4i, with the median follow-up among users of GLP1-RA ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years. Overall, use of GLP1-RA relative to use of DPP-4i was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer (pooled weighted HR 0.81, CI 0.59-1.12). Similarly, we observed no increased risk in thyroid cancer with increasing cumulative dose of GLP1-RA among GLP1-RA ever-users. Subgroup analysis of types of thyroid cancer was not possible. Results remained consistent across a range of supplementary analyses. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> In this large multisite study, utilizing data from six population-based databases, we found no evidence that GLP1-RA use is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer with follow-up ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years, providing some reassurance to patients and clinicians about the short-term safety of these drugs. Nevertheless, evidence was insufficient to rule out excess risk with long-term use, due to the short follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"69-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0387\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0387","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导论:人们担心胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP1-RAs)可能增加甲状腺癌的风险,但证据仍然相互矛盾。因此,我们研究了GLP1-RA的使用与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4is)的使用是否与2型糖尿病患者甲状腺癌风险相关。方法:这项多地点队列研究和随后的荟萃分析包括来自加拿大(安大略省)、丹麦、挪威、韩国、瑞典和台湾的6个基于人群的数据库。研究人群包括2007年至2023年间的2型糖尿病患者。Cox回归模型估计GLP1-RA使用者与dpp -4使用者相比患甲状腺癌的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。使用由特定时间倾向得分产生的标准化死亡率权重对模型进行加权。使用固定效应模型对特定地点的hr进行汇总。结果:我们确定了98,147名GLP1-RA使用者和2,488,303名DPP-4i使用者,GLP1-RA使用者的中位随访时间为1.8至3.0年。总体而言,使用GLP1-RA相对于使用DPP-4i与甲状腺癌风险增加无关(合并加权HR 0.81, CI 0.59-1.12)。同样,我们观察到在GLP1-RA的长期使用者中,随着GLP1-RA累积剂量的增加,甲状腺癌的风险没有增加。无法对甲状腺癌类型进行亚组分析。结果在一系列补充分析中保持一致。讨论:在这项大型多站点研究中,我们利用了来自6个基于人群的数据库的数据,我们发现没有证据表明GLP1-RA的使用与甲状腺癌风险增加有关,随访时间从1.8年到3.0年,为患者和临床医生提供了这些药物短期安全性的一些保证。然而,由于随访时间短,证据不足以排除长期使用的过度风险。
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: An International Multisite Cohort Study.
Introduction: Concerns have been raised that glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) may increase the risk of thyroid cancer, but evidence remains conflicting. We therefore investigated if GLP1-RA use, compared with use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), was associated with thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: This multisite cohort study with subsequent meta-analysis included six population-based databases from Canada (Ontario), Denmark, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan. Study populations comprised patients with type 2 diabetes between 2007 and 2023. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for thyroid cancer among GLP1-RA users compared with DPP-4is. Models were weighted using standardized mortality ratio weights generated from time-specific propensity scores. Site-specific HRs were pooled using a fixed-effects model. Results: We identified 98,147 users of GLP1-RA and 2,488,303 users of DPP-4i, with the median follow-up among users of GLP1-RA ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years. Overall, use of GLP1-RA relative to use of DPP-4i was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer (pooled weighted HR 0.81, CI 0.59-1.12). Similarly, we observed no increased risk in thyroid cancer with increasing cumulative dose of GLP1-RA among GLP1-RA ever-users. Subgroup analysis of types of thyroid cancer was not possible. Results remained consistent across a range of supplementary analyses. Discussion: In this large multisite study, utilizing data from six population-based databases, we found no evidence that GLP1-RA use is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer with follow-up ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years, providing some reassurance to patients and clinicians about the short-term safety of these drugs. Nevertheless, evidence was insufficient to rule out excess risk with long-term use, due to the short follow-up.
期刊介绍:
This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes.
Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.