院前丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类戒断症状——对加利福尼亚州旧金山市前131例病例的描述性回顾

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Amelia L Gurley, Jeremy Lacocque, Mary P Mercer, Michael Mason, Jenni Wiebers, Vanessa Lara, Eric C Silverman, John F Brown, Joseph Graterol, Elaina Gunn, Mikaela T Middleton, Andrew A Herring, H Gene Hern
{"title":"院前丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类戒断症状——对加利福尼亚州旧金山市前131例病例的描述性回顾","authors":"Amelia L Gurley, Jeremy Lacocque, Mary P Mercer, Michael Mason, Jenni Wiebers, Vanessa Lara, Eric C Silverman, John F Brown, Joseph Graterol, Elaina Gunn, Mikaela T Middleton, Andrew A Herring, H Gene Hern","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2449512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a common cause of overdose and mortality in the United States. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians often interact with patients with OUD, including during or shortly after an overdose. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving prehospital buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid withdrawal in an urban EMS system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all initial cases of administration of buprenorphine-naloxone from April 2023 to July 2024 during the first 16 months of a program involving prehospital EMS administration of buprenorphine-naloxone by EMS clinicians to patients with OUD experiencing acute opioid withdrawal in San Francisco. The primary outcome involved reduction in Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Score (COWS) and other adverse events including worsened withdrawal (or increased COWS), nausea, patient destination, and loss to follow up were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Buprenorphine was administered to 131 patients. In 82 (62.6%) cases, patients presented in withdrawal after receiving naloxone from bystanders or EMS as a treatment for overdose. The average COWS prior to administration was 16.1 ± 6.5 and the median COWS prior to administration was 15 (IQR: 11-19). Of the 78 cases where a COWS was available, 74 (94.9%) experienced symptom improvement, with the median COWS dropping from 15 (IQR: 11-19) to 7 (IQR: 4-13) between first and last recorded values. No adverse effects were reported in prehospital records. There was one reported in-hospital incident of withdrawal in the Emergency Department presumably precipitated by buprenorphine. Data on outcomes after EMS transport were limited. Only six patients were successfully contacted at 30 day follow up, but five of these patients were in long-term OUD treatment programs, and three reported sustained abstinence from opioid use. During case review, we found two cases where physicians assisted EMS personnel in recognizing recent methadone use, but no other missed exclusion criteria requiring physician input.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In San Francisco, prehospital administration of buprenorphine for acute opioid withdrawal by EMS clinicians resulted in symptomatic improvement, and case review suggests administration can be safe without direct EMS physician oversight.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital Buprenorphine in Treating Symptoms of Opioid Withdrawal - A Descriptive Review of the First 131 Cases in San Francisco, CA.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia L Gurley, Jeremy Lacocque, Mary P Mercer, Michael Mason, Jenni Wiebers, Vanessa Lara, Eric C Silverman, John F Brown, Joseph Graterol, Elaina Gunn, Mikaela T Middleton, Andrew A Herring, H Gene Hern\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2449512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a common cause of overdose and mortality in the United States. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians often interact with patients with OUD, including during or shortly after an overdose. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving prehospital buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid withdrawal in an urban EMS system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all initial cases of administration of buprenorphine-naloxone from April 2023 to July 2024 during the first 16 months of a program involving prehospital EMS administration of buprenorphine-naloxone by EMS clinicians to patients with OUD experiencing acute opioid withdrawal in San Francisco. The primary outcome involved reduction in Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Score (COWS) and other adverse events including worsened withdrawal (or increased COWS), nausea, patient destination, and loss to follow up were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Buprenorphine was administered to 131 patients. In 82 (62.6%) cases, patients presented in withdrawal after receiving naloxone from bystanders or EMS as a treatment for overdose. The average COWS prior to administration was 16.1 ± 6.5 and the median COWS prior to administration was 15 (IQR: 11-19). Of the 78 cases where a COWS was available, 74 (94.9%) experienced symptom improvement, with the median COWS dropping from 15 (IQR: 11-19) to 7 (IQR: 4-13) between first and last recorded values. No adverse effects were reported in prehospital records. There was one reported in-hospital incident of withdrawal in the Emergency Department presumably precipitated by buprenorphine. Data on outcomes after EMS transport were limited. Only six patients were successfully contacted at 30 day follow up, but five of these patients were in long-term OUD treatment programs, and three reported sustained abstinence from opioid use. During case review, we found two cases where physicians assisted EMS personnel in recognizing recent methadone use, but no other missed exclusion criteria requiring physician input.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In San Francisco, prehospital administration of buprenorphine for acute opioid withdrawal by EMS clinicians resulted in symptomatic improvement, and case review suggests administration can be safe without direct EMS physician oversight.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2449512\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2449512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)仍然是美国过量和死亡的常见原因。紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生经常与OUD患者互动,包括在过量用药期间或之后不久。本研究的目的是描述在城市EMS系统中接受院前丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物戒断的患者的特征和结果。方法:我们对2023年4月至2024年7月在旧金山EMS临床医生院前EMS对急性阿片类药物戒断的OUD患者给予丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮治疗的前16个月的所有初始病例进行了回顾性图表回顾。主要结果包括临床阿片类药物戒断评分(COWS)的减少和其他不良事件,包括戒断恶化(或增加COWS),恶心,患者目的地和随访失败也被评估。结果:131例患者接受丁丙诺啡治疗。在82例(62.6%)病例中,患者在从旁观者或EMS接受纳洛酮作为过量治疗后出现戒断。给药前平均奶牛数为16.1±6.5,给药前奶牛数中位数为15 (IQR: 11-19)。在78例奶牛中,74例(94.9%)出现症状改善,奶牛的中位数在首次和最后记录值之间从15 (IQR: 11-19)降至7 (IQR: 4-13)。院前记录中未报告不良反应。据报道,急诊部发生了一起院内事件,可能是由丁丙诺啡引起的。EMS转运后的结果数据有限。在30天的随访中,只有6名患者成功联系,但其中5名患者长期接受OUD治疗方案,3名患者报告持续戒断阿片类药物使用。在病例回顾中,我们发现两个病例中,医生协助EMS人员识别近期美沙酮的使用,但没有其他遗漏的排除标准需要医生输入。结论:在旧金山,急诊医生院前给丁丙诺啡治疗急性阿片类药物戒断导致症状改善,病例回顾表明,没有急诊医生的直接监督,丁丙诺啡的给药是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prehospital Buprenorphine in Treating Symptoms of Opioid Withdrawal - A Descriptive Review of the First 131 Cases in San Francisco, CA.

Objectives: Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a common cause of overdose and mortality in the United States. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians often interact with patients with OUD, including during or shortly after an overdose. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving prehospital buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid withdrawal in an urban EMS system.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all initial cases of administration of buprenorphine-naloxone from April 2023 to July 2024 during the first 16 months of a program involving prehospital EMS administration of buprenorphine-naloxone by EMS clinicians to patients with OUD experiencing acute opioid withdrawal in San Francisco. The primary outcome involved reduction in Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Score (COWS) and other adverse events including worsened withdrawal (or increased COWS), nausea, patient destination, and loss to follow up were also assessed.

Results: Buprenorphine was administered to 131 patients. In 82 (62.6%) cases, patients presented in withdrawal after receiving naloxone from bystanders or EMS as a treatment for overdose. The average COWS prior to administration was 16.1 ± 6.5 and the median COWS prior to administration was 15 (IQR: 11-19). Of the 78 cases where a COWS was available, 74 (94.9%) experienced symptom improvement, with the median COWS dropping from 15 (IQR: 11-19) to 7 (IQR: 4-13) between first and last recorded values. No adverse effects were reported in prehospital records. There was one reported in-hospital incident of withdrawal in the Emergency Department presumably precipitated by buprenorphine. Data on outcomes after EMS transport were limited. Only six patients were successfully contacted at 30 day follow up, but five of these patients were in long-term OUD treatment programs, and three reported sustained abstinence from opioid use. During case review, we found two cases where physicians assisted EMS personnel in recognizing recent methadone use, but no other missed exclusion criteria requiring physician input.

Conclusions: In San Francisco, prehospital administration of buprenorphine for acute opioid withdrawal by EMS clinicians resulted in symptomatic improvement, and case review suggests administration can be safe without direct EMS physician oversight.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信