农村败血症患者总转院时间较长与死亡率增加无关。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Benjamin Wilkinson, Eliezer Santos León, J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Azeemuddin Ahmed, Karisa K Harland, Brian M Fuller, Kalyn Campbell, Morgan B Swanson, Brett Faine, Anne Zepeski, Luke Mack, Amanda Bell, Katie DeJong, Kelli Wallace, Edith A Parker, Keith Mueller, Elizabeth Chrischilles, Christopher R Carpenter, Michael P Jones, Steven Q Simpson, Nicholas M Mohr
{"title":"农村败血症患者总转院时间较长与死亡率增加无关。","authors":"Benjamin Wilkinson, Eliezer Santos León, J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Azeemuddin Ahmed, Karisa K Harland, Brian M Fuller, Kalyn Campbell, Morgan B Swanson, Brett Faine, Anne Zepeski, Luke Mack, Amanda Bell, Katie DeJong, Kelli Wallace, Edith A Parker, Keith Mueller, Elizabeth Chrischilles, Christopher R Carpenter, Michael P Jones, Steven Q Simpson, Nicholas M Mohr","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2447044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sepsis is a time-sensitive condition, and many rural emergency department (ED) sepsis patients are transferred to tertiary hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine whether longer transport times during interhospital transfer are associated with higher sepsis mortality or increased hospital length-of-stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A cohort of rural adult (age ≥ 18 y) sepsis patients transferred between hospitals were identified in the TELEmedicine as a Virtual Intervention for Sepsis Care in Emergency Departments (TELEVISED) parent study. We collected data on the time spent between triage and disposition at the rural ED (ED LOS), time from rural ED disposition to arrival at the destination hospital (transport duration), and overall time from rural ED triage to arrival at the destination hospital (total transfer time). We used a zero inflated negative binomial model with log link for the primary outcome (28-day hospital-free days), and a logit model for secondary outcomes of Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) bundle adherence and in-hospital mortality. We included clinical and demographic covariates in model development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We included 359 transferred rural sepsis patients. There was no association between ED LOS (aRR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.02), transport duration (aRR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.99-1.07), or total transfer time (aRR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.03) and 28-day hospital free days. Similarly, we found no association between ED LOS, transport duration, and total transfer time with secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Longer total transfer time showed no association with 28-day hospital free days in rural sepsis patients. Future work will seek to better understand how rural ED sepsis care can be optimized to maximize outcomes in transferred patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longer Total Interhospital Transfer Times for Rural Sepsis Patients Not Associated with Increased Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Wilkinson, Eliezer Santos León, J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Azeemuddin Ahmed, Karisa K Harland, Brian M Fuller, Kalyn Campbell, Morgan B Swanson, Brett Faine, Anne Zepeski, Luke Mack, Amanda Bell, Katie DeJong, Kelli Wallace, Edith A Parker, Keith Mueller, Elizabeth Chrischilles, Christopher R Carpenter, Michael P Jones, Steven Q Simpson, Nicholas M Mohr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2447044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sepsis is a time-sensitive condition, and many rural emergency department (ED) sepsis patients are transferred to tertiary hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine whether longer transport times during interhospital transfer are associated with higher sepsis mortality or increased hospital length-of-stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A cohort of rural adult (age ≥ 18 y) sepsis patients transferred between hospitals were identified in the TELEmedicine as a Virtual Intervention for Sepsis Care in Emergency Departments (TELEVISED) parent study. We collected data on the time spent between triage and disposition at the rural ED (ED LOS), time from rural ED disposition to arrival at the destination hospital (transport duration), and overall time from rural ED triage to arrival at the destination hospital (total transfer time). We used a zero inflated negative binomial model with log link for the primary outcome (28-day hospital-free days), and a logit model for secondary outcomes of Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) bundle adherence and in-hospital mortality. We included clinical and demographic covariates in model development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We included 359 transferred rural sepsis patients. There was no association between ED LOS (aRR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.02), transport duration (aRR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.99-1.07), or total transfer time (aRR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.03) and 28-day hospital free days. Similarly, we found no association between ED LOS, transport duration, and total transfer time with secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Longer total transfer time showed no association with 28-day hospital free days in rural sepsis patients. Future work will seek to better understand how rural ED sepsis care can be optimized to maximize outcomes in transferred patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2447044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2447044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脓毒症是一种时间敏感的疾病,许多农村急诊科(ED)脓毒症患者被转移到三级医院。本研究的目的是确定医院间转院期间较长的转运时间是否与较高的败血症死亡率或住院时间(LOS)增加有关。方法:在远程医疗作为急诊脓毒症护理虚拟干预(电视)家长研究中,确定了一组在医院之间转院的农村成人(年龄≥18岁)脓毒症患者。我们收集了从农村急诊科分诊到处置的时间(ED LOS),从农村急诊科处置到到达目的地医院的时间(运输时间),以及从农村急诊科分诊到到达目的地医院的总时间(总转运时间)的数据。我们对主要结局(28天无住院天数)采用零膨胀负二项模型,对脓毒症存活运动(SSC)捆绑治疗依从性和住院死亡率的次要结局采用logit模型。我们在模型开发中纳入了临床和人口统计学协变量。结果:纳入359例农村败血症转院患者。ED与LOS无相关性(aRR: 1.00;95% CI: 0.98-1.02),运输时间(aRR: 1.03;95% CI: 0.99-1.07)或总转移时间(aRR: 1.01;95% CI: 0.99-1.03)和28天免费住院天数。同样,我们发现ED LOS、运输持续时间和总转移时间与次要结局之间没有关联。结论:较长的总转院时间与农村败血症患者28天免费住院天数无关。未来的工作将寻求更好地了解如何优化农村ED败血症护理,以最大限度地提高转院患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longer Total Interhospital Transfer Times for Rural Sepsis Patients Not Associated with Increased Mortality.

Objectives: Sepsis is a time-sensitive condition, and many rural emergency department (ED) sepsis patients are transferred to tertiary hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine whether longer transport times during interhospital transfer are associated with higher sepsis mortality or increased hospital length-of-stay (LOS).

Methods:  A cohort of rural adult (age ≥ 18 y) sepsis patients transferred between hospitals were identified in the TELEmedicine as a Virtual Intervention for Sepsis Care in Emergency Departments (TELEVISED) parent study. We collected data on the time spent between triage and disposition at the rural ED (ED LOS), time from rural ED disposition to arrival at the destination hospital (transport duration), and overall time from rural ED triage to arrival at the destination hospital (total transfer time). We used a zero inflated negative binomial model with log link for the primary outcome (28-day hospital-free days), and a logit model for secondary outcomes of Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) bundle adherence and in-hospital mortality. We included clinical and demographic covariates in model development.

Results:  We included 359 transferred rural sepsis patients. There was no association between ED LOS (aRR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.02), transport duration (aRR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.99-1.07), or total transfer time (aRR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.99-1.03) and 28-day hospital free days. Similarly, we found no association between ED LOS, transport duration, and total transfer time with secondary outcomes.

Conclusions:  Longer total transfer time showed no association with 28-day hospital free days in rural sepsis patients. Future work will seek to better understand how rural ED sepsis care can be optimized to maximize outcomes in transferred patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信