{"title":"骨矿物质密度预测骨强度有多准确？绝经后妇女骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床观察研究。","authors":"Xuemeng Mu, Hengyan Zhang, Jia Zhang","doi":"10.1111/os.14354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides incomplete information about bone strength. There are few data on the relationship between osteoporosis-related examinations and bone strength. The objective of the present study was to determine which osteoporosis-related examinations best predicted trabecular bone strength, and to enhance a formula for predicting bone strength on the basis of bone density examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included postmenopausal women (aged over 50 years) who underwent unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgery in the lumbar spine between September 2021 and June 2023. The pressure within each balloon expansion circle was extracted to reflect the true bone strength. The NHANES 2013-2014 data were used to assess the performance of the formula. The performance of the formula was compared with that of the observed actual fractures. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between the formula and the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 postmenopausal women (mean age ± standard deviation, 70.90 years ± 10.30) were enrolled. The average balloon pressure was 59.23 psi (± 12.40, means ± SDs). The mean BMD of total lumbar spine (average of L1-L4) was 0.89 g/cm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.20 (mean ± standard), and the Pearson correlation coefficient between lumbar BMD and bone strength was 0.516. After adjusting for age and BMI, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%. Calibration plots of the observed actual fractures versus those estimated via the bone strength formula were considered good fits. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference between the formula and the FRAX score in predicting fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjustment, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%, indicating a strong correlation. In addition, Bone Strength = DXA × 27 - Age × 0.585-BMI × 0.887 + 98.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Accurately Does Bone Mineral Density Predict Bone Strength? A Clinical Observational Study of Osteoporosis Vertebral Compression Fractures in Postmenopausal Women.\",\"authors\":\"Xuemeng Mu, Hengyan Zhang, Jia Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.14354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides incomplete information about bone strength. There are few data on the relationship between osteoporosis-related examinations and bone strength. The objective of the present study was to determine which osteoporosis-related examinations best predicted trabecular bone strength, and to enhance a formula for predicting bone strength on the basis of bone density examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included postmenopausal women (aged over 50 years) who underwent unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgery in the lumbar spine between September 2021 and June 2023. The pressure within each balloon expansion circle was extracted to reflect the true bone strength. The NHANES 2013-2014 data were used to assess the performance of the formula. The performance of the formula was compared with that of the observed actual fractures. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between the formula and the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 postmenopausal women (mean age ± standard deviation, 70.90 years ± 10.30) were enrolled. The average balloon pressure was 59.23 psi (± 12.40, means ± SDs). The mean BMD of total lumbar spine (average of L1-L4) was 0.89 g/cm<sup>2</sup> ± 0.20 (mean ± standard), and the Pearson correlation coefficient between lumbar BMD and bone strength was 0.516. After adjusting for age and BMI, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%. Calibration plots of the observed actual fractures versus those estimated via the bone strength formula were considered good fits. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference between the formula and the FRAX score in predicting fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjustment, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%, indicating a strong correlation. In addition, Bone Strength = DXA × 27 - Age × 0.585-BMI × 0.887 + 98.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14354\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Accurately Does Bone Mineral Density Predict Bone Strength? A Clinical Observational Study of Osteoporosis Vertebral Compression Fractures in Postmenopausal Women.
Objectives: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provides incomplete information about bone strength. There are few data on the relationship between osteoporosis-related examinations and bone strength. The objective of the present study was to determine which osteoporosis-related examinations best predicted trabecular bone strength, and to enhance a formula for predicting bone strength on the basis of bone density examination.
Methods: This observational study included postmenopausal women (aged over 50 years) who underwent unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgery in the lumbar spine between September 2021 and June 2023. The pressure within each balloon expansion circle was extracted to reflect the true bone strength. The NHANES 2013-2014 data were used to assess the performance of the formula. The performance of the formula was compared with that of the observed actual fractures. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between the formula and the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) score.
Results: A total of 40 postmenopausal women (mean age ± standard deviation, 70.90 years ± 10.30) were enrolled. The average balloon pressure was 59.23 psi (± 12.40, means ± SDs). The mean BMD of total lumbar spine (average of L1-L4) was 0.89 g/cm2 ± 0.20 (mean ± standard), and the Pearson correlation coefficient between lumbar BMD and bone strength was 0.516. After adjusting for age and BMI, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%. Calibration plots of the observed actual fractures versus those estimated via the bone strength formula were considered good fits. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference between the formula and the FRAX score in predicting fracture risk.
Conclusions: After adjustment, the DXA response rate to bone strength reached 72%, indicating a strong correlation. In addition, Bone Strength = DXA × 27 - Age × 0.585-BMI × 0.887 + 98.
期刊介绍：
Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery.
The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
