改良剂-22对髋臼骨折固定后报销的影响。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Caleb J Bischoff, Kylee Rucinski, Wayne Hoskins, Douglas R Haase, Jaime L Bellamy
{"title":"改良剂-22对髋臼骨折固定后报销的影响。","authors":"Caleb J Bischoff, Kylee Rucinski, Wayne Hoskins, Douglas R Haase, Jaime L Bellamy","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 22-modifier in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system indicates increased surgical procedure complexity, aiming to secure greater reimbursement for surgeons. This study investigated the 22-modifier on reimbursement amounts after acetabular fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Level I Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Included were patients with third party reimbursement for acute acetabular fracture (AO/OTA 62A-C) fixation through an open approach from 2005 to 2021 as identified using CPT codes 27226, 27227 and 27228.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Chart review identified procedures where the 22-modifier for obesity or fracture complexity was applied. A cohort without the 22-modifier matched by diagnosis, primary CPT code and insurance carrier was made for comparison. The primary outcome measure was the difference in financial reimbursement when the 22-modifier was used. Secondary outcomes were the difference in billed charges and operative time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 785 cases were initially identified with 747 meeting the inclusion criteria, and 73 having the 22-modifier applied. After removing surgeries that did not receive compensation from their insurance, 52 of these patients were compared to 52 matched cases without a 22-modifier. The 22-modifier group and the non-modifier group had no significant difference in reimbursed amounts ($4,112.71 USD vs. $3,851.00, p = 0.644). However, patients in the 22-modifier group had significantly greater billed charges ($8,007.35 vs. $7,120.94 USD; p = 0.0096), longer operative times (301.7 vs. 240.2 minutes, p < 0.001) and greater body mass index (BMI) (43.1 vs 29.3 kg/m2; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increased complexity and greater billed charges, the use of a 22-modifier in acetabular fracture cases did not result in improved collected reimbursements, and reimbursement is equal to when the 22-modifier is not used. Policymakers and insurers should revise reimbursement structures to better align reimbursements for acetabular fixation with surgical complexity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Modifier-22 on Reimbursement Following Acetabular Fracture Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Caleb J Bischoff, Kylee Rucinski, Wayne Hoskins, Douglas R Haase, Jaime L Bellamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 22-modifier in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system indicates increased surgical procedure complexity, aiming to secure greater reimbursement for surgeons. This study investigated the 22-modifier on reimbursement amounts after acetabular fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Level I Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Included were patients with third party reimbursement for acute acetabular fracture (AO/OTA 62A-C) fixation through an open approach from 2005 to 2021 as identified using CPT codes 27226, 27227 and 27228.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Chart review identified procedures where the 22-modifier for obesity or fracture complexity was applied. A cohort without the 22-modifier matched by diagnosis, primary CPT code and insurance carrier was made for comparison. The primary outcome measure was the difference in financial reimbursement when the 22-modifier was used. Secondary outcomes were the difference in billed charges and operative time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 785 cases were initially identified with 747 meeting the inclusion criteria, and 73 having the 22-modifier applied. After removing surgeries that did not receive compensation from their insurance, 52 of these patients were compared to 52 matched cases without a 22-modifier. The 22-modifier group and the non-modifier group had no significant difference in reimbursed amounts ($4,112.71 USD vs. $3,851.00, p = 0.644). However, patients in the 22-modifier group had significantly greater billed charges ($8,007.35 vs. $7,120.94 USD; p = 0.0096), longer operative times (301.7 vs. 240.2 minutes, p < 0.001) and greater body mass index (BMI) (43.1 vs 29.3 kg/m2; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increased complexity and greater billed charges, the use of a 22-modifier in acetabular fracture cases did not result in improved collected reimbursements, and reimbursement is equal to when the 22-modifier is not used. Policymakers and insurers should revise reimbursement structures to better align reimbursements for acetabular fixation with surgical complexity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002960\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:现行程序术语(CPT)系统中的22修改者表明手术程序复杂性增加,旨在确保外科医生获得更高的报销。本研究探讨22改良剂对髋臼骨折固定后报销金额的影响。方法:设计:回顾性队列研究。单位:学术一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:纳入2005年至2021年通过开放入路进行急性髋臼骨折(AO/OTA 62A-C)固定的第三方报销患者,使用CPT代码27226、27227和27228确定。结果测量和比较:图表回顾确定了肥胖或骨折复杂性22改良剂的应用程序。没有22修饰语的队列通过诊断、原始CPT代码和保险公司进行匹配进行比较。主要结果测量是使用22修饰符时财务报销的差异。次要结果是计费费用和手术时间的差异。结果:初步筛选出785例,符合纳入标准的有747例,使用22修饰剂的有73例。在移除没有从保险中获得补偿的手术后,将这些患者中的52例与没有22修饰符的52例进行比较。在报销金额方面,22名改良者组与非改良者组差异无统计学意义(4112.71美元vs 3851.00美元,p = 0.644)。然而,22改良剂组患者的账单费用明显更高(8,007.35美元对7,120.94美元;p = 0.0096),更长的手术时间(301.7 vs 240.2分钟,p < 0.001)和更高的体重指数(BMI) (43.1 vs 29.3 kg/m2;P < 0.001)。结论:在髋臼骨折病例中使用22-调节剂虽然增加了复杂性和更高的账单费用,但并没有改善报销情况,报销情况与不使用22-调节剂时相同。决策者和保险公司应修订报销结构,以更好地使髋臼固定的报销与手术复杂性相一致。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Modifier-22 on Reimbursement Following Acetabular Fracture Fixation.

Objectives: The 22-modifier in the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system indicates increased surgical procedure complexity, aiming to secure greater reimbursement for surgeons. This study investigated the 22-modifier on reimbursement amounts after acetabular fracture fixation.

Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic Level I Trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: Included were patients with third party reimbursement for acute acetabular fracture (AO/OTA 62A-C) fixation through an open approach from 2005 to 2021 as identified using CPT codes 27226, 27227 and 27228.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Chart review identified procedures where the 22-modifier for obesity or fracture complexity was applied. A cohort without the 22-modifier matched by diagnosis, primary CPT code and insurance carrier was made for comparison. The primary outcome measure was the difference in financial reimbursement when the 22-modifier was used. Secondary outcomes were the difference in billed charges and operative time.

Results: A total of 785 cases were initially identified with 747 meeting the inclusion criteria, and 73 having the 22-modifier applied. After removing surgeries that did not receive compensation from their insurance, 52 of these patients were compared to 52 matched cases without a 22-modifier. The 22-modifier group and the non-modifier group had no significant difference in reimbursed amounts ($4,112.71 USD vs. $3,851.00, p = 0.644). However, patients in the 22-modifier group had significantly greater billed charges ($8,007.35 vs. $7,120.94 USD; p = 0.0096), longer operative times (301.7 vs. 240.2 minutes, p < 0.001) and greater body mass index (BMI) (43.1 vs 29.3 kg/m2; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Despite increased complexity and greater billed charges, the use of a 22-modifier in acetabular fracture cases did not result in improved collected reimbursements, and reimbursement is equal to when the 22-modifier is not used. Policymakers and insurers should revise reimbursement structures to better align reimbursements for acetabular fixation with surgical complexity.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信