应用诱导膜技术重建胫骨干临界骨缺损时,胫骨前内侧巩固优于其他部位:附37例111例连续计算机断层扫描分析。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Whee Sung Son, Eic Ju Lim, Beom-Soo Kim, Wonseok Choi, Jae-Woo Cho, Jong-Keon Oh
{"title":"应用诱导膜技术重建胫骨干临界骨缺损时,胫骨前内侧巩固优于其他部位:附37例111例连续计算机断层扫描分析。","authors":"Whee Sung Son, Eic Ju Lim, Beom-Soo Kim, Wonseok Choi, Jae-Woo Cho, Jong-Keon Oh","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the consolidation quality between the anteromedial aspect of regenerated bone (AMRB) and the other areas of regenerated bone (TORB) following the induced membrane technique (IMT) for managing critical-sized tibial shaft bone defects, and determine the factors affecting consolidation quality in the AMRB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients selection criteria: </strong>Included were patients who underwent IMT with only an intramedullary nail for tibial shaft segmental defects and serial computed tomography immediately, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Comparison were made of regenerative bone volume, density, and corticalization between AMRB and TORB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 37 patients with a mean age of 47.7 years (range 20-79). Twenty-eight (75.7%) patients were men. Postoperatively, the AMRB exhibited significantly more negative volumetric change than TORB at 0-1 year (-20.01% ± 25.59% vs. -13.32% ± 22.48%, P = 0.028), less positive density change 0-6 months (+197.84 ± 107.95 vs. +290.14 ± 131.74 Hounsfield unit (HU), P < 0.001) and 0-1 year (+377.51 ± 150.71 HU vs. +455.48 ± 135.04 HU, P < 0.001), and lower corticalization rate in 1 year (49.77% ± 29.42% vs. 82.27 ± 19.73%, P < 0.001). Significant factors included fracture-related infection (FRI) ( P = 0.047 and P = 0.048 at 0-6 months and 0-1 year, respectively) and longer defect length ( P = 0.032 and P = 0.020) for the negative volumetric AMRB changes; older age ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.016) for the AMRB negative density changes; higher percentage of mixed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in graft material ( P = 0.013 in 0-6 months) for the AMRB positive density change; FRI ( P = 0.024) for the inferior corticalization rate of the AMRB; FRI ( P = 0.026 in 0-1 year), longer defect length ( P = 0.017 in 0-6 months), and higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.010 in 0-1 year) for the difference in density change between the AMRB and TORB; higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.023) for the difference between the AMRB and TORB in corticalization rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tibial shaft's anteromedial aspects demonstrated significantly inferior consolidation after IMT, especially in terms of volume at 6 months, density at 6 months and 1 year, and corticalization at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"46-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consolidation of the Anteromedial Aspect of the Tibia Is Inferior to the Other Areas in the Reconstruction of Critical-Sized Bone Defect of the Tibial Shaft Using the Induced Membrane Technique: An Analysis of 111 Serial Computed Tomography of 37 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Whee Sung Son, Eic Ju Lim, Beom-Soo Kim, Wonseok Choi, Jae-Woo Cho, Jong-Keon Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the consolidation quality between the anteromedial aspect of regenerated bone (AMRB) and the other areas of regenerated bone (TORB) following the induced membrane technique (IMT) for managing critical-sized tibial shaft bone defects, and determine the factors affecting consolidation quality in the AMRB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients selection criteria: </strong>Included were patients who underwent IMT with only an intramedullary nail for tibial shaft segmental defects and serial computed tomography immediately, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Comparison were made of regenerative bone volume, density, and corticalization between AMRB and TORB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 37 patients with a mean age of 47.7 years (range 20-79). Twenty-eight (75.7%) patients were men. Postoperatively, the AMRB exhibited significantly more negative volumetric change than TORB at 0-1 year (-20.01% ± 25.59% vs. -13.32% ± 22.48%, P = 0.028), less positive density change 0-6 months (+197.84 ± 107.95 vs. +290.14 ± 131.74 Hounsfield unit (HU), P < 0.001) and 0-1 year (+377.51 ± 150.71 HU vs. +455.48 ± 135.04 HU, P < 0.001), and lower corticalization rate in 1 year (49.77% ± 29.42% vs. 82.27 ± 19.73%, P < 0.001). Significant factors included fracture-related infection (FRI) ( P = 0.047 and P = 0.048 at 0-6 months and 0-1 year, respectively) and longer defect length ( P = 0.032 and P = 0.020) for the negative volumetric AMRB changes; older age ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.016) for the AMRB negative density changes; higher percentage of mixed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in graft material ( P = 0.013 in 0-6 months) for the AMRB positive density change; FRI ( P = 0.024) for the inferior corticalization rate of the AMRB; FRI ( P = 0.026 in 0-1 year), longer defect length ( P = 0.017 in 0-6 months), and higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.010 in 0-1 year) for the difference in density change between the AMRB and TORB; higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.023) for the difference between the AMRB and TORB in corticalization rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tibial shaft's anteromedial aspects demonstrated significantly inferior consolidation after IMT, especially in terms of volume at 6 months, density at 6 months and 1 year, and corticalization at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"46-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较诱导膜技术(IMT)治疗临界尺寸胫骨骨缺损后,再生骨前内侧面(AMRB)与其他再生骨区域(TORB)的巩固质量,并确定影响AMRB巩固质量的因素。方法:设计:回顾性比较研究。单位:一级创伤学术中心。患者选择标准:包括术后立即、6个月和1年仅行髓内钉IMT治疗胫干节段缺损和连续计算机断层扫描的患者。结果测量和比较:比较AMRB和TORB的再生骨体积、密度和皮质化。结果:本研究纳入37例患者,平均年龄47.7岁(范围20-79)。男性28例(75.7%)。术后0-1年AMRB的体积变化明显大于TORB(-20.01%±25.59%比-13.32%±22.48%,p = 0.028), 0-6个月(+197.84±107.95比+290.14±131.74 HU, p < 0.001)和0-1年(+377.51±150.71 HU比+455.48±135.04 HU, p < 0.001)的阳性密度变化明显小于TORB(49.77%±29.42%比82.27±19.73%,p < 0.001), 1年内皮质化率较低(49.77%±29.42%比82.27±19.73%,p < 0.001)。显著性因素包括骨折相关感染(FRI)(0-6个月和0-1年分别为p = 0.047和p = 0.048)和较长的缺损长度(p = 0.032和p = 0.020);年龄越大(p = 0.004和p = 0.016), AMRB阴性密度变化越大;混合重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2在移植材料中的比例较高(0-6个月p = 0.013),导致AMRB阳性密度变化;FRI (p = 0.024)表示AMRB的下皮质化率;FRI(0-1年p = 0.026),缺损长度较长(0-6个月p = 0.017),混合脱矿骨基质(DBM)百分比较高(0-1年p = 0.010);在皮质化率方面,AMRB和TORB之间的差异更高的混合DBM百分比(p = 0.023)。结论:诱导膜技术后胫骨干前内侧的实变明显较差,尤其是在6个月时的体积、6个月和1年的密度以及术后1年的皮质化方面。证据等级:治疗性III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consolidation of the Anteromedial Aspect of the Tibia Is Inferior to the Other Areas in the Reconstruction of Critical-Sized Bone Defect of the Tibial Shaft Using the Induced Membrane Technique: An Analysis of 111 Serial Computed Tomography of 37 Patients.

Objectives: To compare the consolidation quality between the anteromedial aspect of regenerated bone (AMRB) and the other areas of regenerated bone (TORB) following the induced membrane technique (IMT) for managing critical-sized tibial shaft bone defects, and determine the factors affecting consolidation quality in the AMRB.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective comparative study.

Setting: Academic Level I trauma center.

Patients selection criteria: Included were patients who underwent IMT with only an intramedullary nail for tibial shaft segmental defects and serial computed tomography immediately, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Comparison were made of regenerative bone volume, density, and corticalization between AMRB and TORB.

Results: This study enrolled 37 patients with a mean age of 47.7 years (range 20-79). Twenty-eight (75.7%) patients were men. Postoperatively, the AMRB exhibited significantly more negative volumetric change than TORB at 0-1 year (-20.01% ± 25.59% vs. -13.32% ± 22.48%, P = 0.028), less positive density change 0-6 months (+197.84 ± 107.95 vs. +290.14 ± 131.74 Hounsfield unit (HU), P < 0.001) and 0-1 year (+377.51 ± 150.71 HU vs. +455.48 ± 135.04 HU, P < 0.001), and lower corticalization rate in 1 year (49.77% ± 29.42% vs. 82.27 ± 19.73%, P < 0.001). Significant factors included fracture-related infection (FRI) ( P = 0.047 and P = 0.048 at 0-6 months and 0-1 year, respectively) and longer defect length ( P = 0.032 and P = 0.020) for the negative volumetric AMRB changes; older age ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.016) for the AMRB negative density changes; higher percentage of mixed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in graft material ( P = 0.013 in 0-6 months) for the AMRB positive density change; FRI ( P = 0.024) for the inferior corticalization rate of the AMRB; FRI ( P = 0.026 in 0-1 year), longer defect length ( P = 0.017 in 0-6 months), and higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.010 in 0-1 year) for the difference in density change between the AMRB and TORB; higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.023) for the difference between the AMRB and TORB in corticalization rates.

Conclusions: The tibial shaft's anteromedial aspects demonstrated significantly inferior consolidation after IMT, especially in terms of volume at 6 months, density at 6 months and 1 year, and corticalization at 1 year postoperatively.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信