Whee Sung Son, Eic Ju Lim, Beom-Soo Kim, Wonseok Choi, Jae-Woo Cho, Jong-Keon Oh
{"title":"应用诱导膜技术重建胫骨干临界骨缺损时,胫骨前内侧巩固优于其他部位:附37例111例连续计算机断层扫描分析。","authors":"Whee Sung Son, Eic Ju Lim, Beom-Soo Kim, Wonseok Choi, Jae-Woo Cho, Jong-Keon Oh","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the consolidation quality between the anteromedial aspect of regenerated bone (AMRB) and the other areas of regenerated bone (TORB) following the induced membrane technique (IMT) for managing critical-sized tibial shaft bone defects, and determine the factors affecting consolidation quality in the AMRB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients selection criteria: </strong>Included were patients who underwent IMT with only an intramedullary nail for tibial shaft segmental defects and serial computed tomography immediately, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Comparison were made of regenerative bone volume, density, and corticalization between AMRB and TORB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 37 patients with a mean age of 47.7 years (range 20-79). Twenty-eight (75.7%) patients were men. Postoperatively, the AMRB exhibited significantly more negative volumetric change than TORB at 0-1 year (-20.01% ± 25.59% vs. -13.32% ± 22.48%, P = 0.028), less positive density change 0-6 months (+197.84 ± 107.95 vs. +290.14 ± 131.74 Hounsfield unit (HU), P < 0.001) and 0-1 year (+377.51 ± 150.71 HU vs. +455.48 ± 135.04 HU, P < 0.001), and lower corticalization rate in 1 year (49.77% ± 29.42% vs. 82.27 ± 19.73%, P < 0.001). Significant factors included fracture-related infection (FRI) ( P = 0.047 and P = 0.048 at 0-6 months and 0-1 year, respectively) and longer defect length ( P = 0.032 and P = 0.020) for the negative volumetric AMRB changes; older age ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.016) for the AMRB negative density changes; higher percentage of mixed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in graft material ( P = 0.013 in 0-6 months) for the AMRB positive density change; FRI ( P = 0.024) for the inferior corticalization rate of the AMRB; FRI ( P = 0.026 in 0-1 year), longer defect length ( P = 0.017 in 0-6 months), and higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.010 in 0-1 year) for the difference in density change between the AMRB and TORB; higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.023) for the difference between the AMRB and TORB in corticalization rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tibial shaft's anteromedial aspects demonstrated significantly inferior consolidation after IMT, especially in terms of volume at 6 months, density at 6 months and 1 year, and corticalization at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"46-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consolidation of the Anteromedial Aspect of the Tibia Is Inferior to the Other Areas in the Reconstruction of Critical-Sized Bone Defect of the Tibial Shaft Using the Induced Membrane Technique: An Analysis of 111 Serial Computed Tomography of 37 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Whee Sung Son, Eic Ju Lim, Beom-Soo Kim, Wonseok Choi, Jae-Woo Cho, Jong-Keon Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the consolidation quality between the anteromedial aspect of regenerated bone (AMRB) and the other areas of regenerated bone (TORB) following the induced membrane technique (IMT) for managing critical-sized tibial shaft bone defects, and determine the factors affecting consolidation quality in the AMRB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients selection criteria: </strong>Included were patients who underwent IMT with only an intramedullary nail for tibial shaft segmental defects and serial computed tomography immediately, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Comparison were made of regenerative bone volume, density, and corticalization between AMRB and TORB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study enrolled 37 patients with a mean age of 47.7 years (range 20-79). Twenty-eight (75.7%) patients were men. Postoperatively, the AMRB exhibited significantly more negative volumetric change than TORB at 0-1 year (-20.01% ± 25.59% vs. -13.32% ± 22.48%, P = 0.028), less positive density change 0-6 months (+197.84 ± 107.95 vs. +290.14 ± 131.74 Hounsfield unit (HU), P < 0.001) and 0-1 year (+377.51 ± 150.71 HU vs. +455.48 ± 135.04 HU, P < 0.001), and lower corticalization rate in 1 year (49.77% ± 29.42% vs. 82.27 ± 19.73%, P < 0.001). Significant factors included fracture-related infection (FRI) ( P = 0.047 and P = 0.048 at 0-6 months and 0-1 year, respectively) and longer defect length ( P = 0.032 and P = 0.020) for the negative volumetric AMRB changes; older age ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.016) for the AMRB negative density changes; higher percentage of mixed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in graft material ( P = 0.013 in 0-6 months) for the AMRB positive density change; FRI ( P = 0.024) for the inferior corticalization rate of the AMRB; FRI ( P = 0.026 in 0-1 year), longer defect length ( P = 0.017 in 0-6 months), and higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.010 in 0-1 year) for the difference in density change between the AMRB and TORB; higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.023) for the difference between the AMRB and TORB in corticalization rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tibial shaft's anteromedial aspects demonstrated significantly inferior consolidation after IMT, especially in terms of volume at 6 months, density at 6 months and 1 year, and corticalization at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"46-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consolidation of the Anteromedial Aspect of the Tibia Is Inferior to the Other Areas in the Reconstruction of Critical-Sized Bone Defect of the Tibial Shaft Using the Induced Membrane Technique: An Analysis of 111 Serial Computed Tomography of 37 Patients.
Objectives: To compare the consolidation quality between the anteromedial aspect of regenerated bone (AMRB) and the other areas of regenerated bone (TORB) following the induced membrane technique (IMT) for managing critical-sized tibial shaft bone defects, and determine the factors affecting consolidation quality in the AMRB.
Methods:
Design: Retrospective comparative study.
Setting: Academic Level I trauma center.
Patients selection criteria: Included were patients who underwent IMT with only an intramedullary nail for tibial shaft segmental defects and serial computed tomography immediately, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.
Outcome measures and comparisons: Comparison were made of regenerative bone volume, density, and corticalization between AMRB and TORB.
Results: This study enrolled 37 patients with a mean age of 47.7 years (range 20-79). Twenty-eight (75.7%) patients were men. Postoperatively, the AMRB exhibited significantly more negative volumetric change than TORB at 0-1 year (-20.01% ± 25.59% vs. -13.32% ± 22.48%, P = 0.028), less positive density change 0-6 months (+197.84 ± 107.95 vs. +290.14 ± 131.74 Hounsfield unit (HU), P < 0.001) and 0-1 year (+377.51 ± 150.71 HU vs. +455.48 ± 135.04 HU, P < 0.001), and lower corticalization rate in 1 year (49.77% ± 29.42% vs. 82.27 ± 19.73%, P < 0.001). Significant factors included fracture-related infection (FRI) ( P = 0.047 and P = 0.048 at 0-6 months and 0-1 year, respectively) and longer defect length ( P = 0.032 and P = 0.020) for the negative volumetric AMRB changes; older age ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.016) for the AMRB negative density changes; higher percentage of mixed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in graft material ( P = 0.013 in 0-6 months) for the AMRB positive density change; FRI ( P = 0.024) for the inferior corticalization rate of the AMRB; FRI ( P = 0.026 in 0-1 year), longer defect length ( P = 0.017 in 0-6 months), and higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.010 in 0-1 year) for the difference in density change between the AMRB and TORB; higher mixed demineralized bone matrix percentage ( P = 0.023) for the difference between the AMRB and TORB in corticalization rates.
Conclusions: The tibial shaft's anteromedial aspects demonstrated significantly inferior consolidation after IMT, especially in terms of volume at 6 months, density at 6 months and 1 year, and corticalization at 1 year postoperatively.
Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.