儿童舟状骨不连:保险状况起作用吗?

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002864
James S Lin, James MacDonald, Julie Balch Samora
{"title":"儿童舟状骨不连:保险状况起作用吗?","authors":"James S Lin, James MacDonald, Julie Balch Samora","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are no studies that evaluate the effects that insurance or socioeconomic status may have on treatment and outcomes of scaphoid nonunions in children. We evaluated whether there is an association between insurance status and (1) time from injury to hand surgeon evaluation, (2) time from specialist evaluation to surgery, and (3) postoperative outcomes of scaphoid fracture nonunions in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A chart review was performed for patients who underwent surgical treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion from January 2015 and April 2021 at a large tertiary care pediatric hospital. Underinsured patients were defined as those with no medical insurance or Medicaid/state-funded insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 21 privately insured patients and 17 patients who were underinsured. There was no difference in age, race, or fracture characteristics between the two groups. The mean time between injury and hand surgeon evaluation was 192 SD 195 days for the privately insured group compared with 155 SD 205 days for the underinsured group (P = 0.57). The mean time between specialist evaluation and surgical treatment was 35 SD 54 days for the privately insured group and 31 SD 31 days for the underinsured group (P = 0.82). Union was achieved in 80% of patients with private insurance compared with 88% of underinsured patients after primary surgery (P = 0.67). There was no difference detected in the proportion of patients who had residual pain (15% vs 19%), range of motion deficits (38% vs 40%), strength deficit (6% vs 7%), and return to activity (94% vs 93%) between privately insured and underinsured patients, respectively (P = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no difference in time from injury to specialist evaluation, time from evaluation to surgery, or postoperative outcomes based on insurance status for pediatric patients with scaphoid fracture nonunions. Although insurance status was not associated with access to care for pediatric scaphoid fracture nonunions at our institution, this information may not be generalizable to other populations, including patients who sustain primary scaphoid fractures and who have not yet developed nonunions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":"45 2","pages":"64-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Scaphoid Nonunions: Does Insurance Status Play a Role?\",\"authors\":\"James S Lin, James MacDonald, Julie Balch Samora\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are no studies that evaluate the effects that insurance or socioeconomic status may have on treatment and outcomes of scaphoid nonunions in children. We evaluated whether there is an association between insurance status and (1) time from injury to hand surgeon evaluation, (2) time from specialist evaluation to surgery, and (3) postoperative outcomes of scaphoid fracture nonunions in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A chart review was performed for patients who underwent surgical treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion from January 2015 and April 2021 at a large tertiary care pediatric hospital. Underinsured patients were defined as those with no medical insurance or Medicaid/state-funded insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 21 privately insured patients and 17 patients who were underinsured. There was no difference in age, race, or fracture characteristics between the two groups. The mean time between injury and hand surgeon evaluation was 192 SD 195 days for the privately insured group compared with 155 SD 205 days for the underinsured group (P = 0.57). The mean time between specialist evaluation and surgical treatment was 35 SD 54 days for the privately insured group and 31 SD 31 days for the underinsured group (P = 0.82). Union was achieved in 80% of patients with private insurance compared with 88% of underinsured patients after primary surgery (P = 0.67). There was no difference detected in the proportion of patients who had residual pain (15% vs 19%), range of motion deficits (38% vs 40%), strength deficit (6% vs 7%), and return to activity (94% vs 93%) between privately insured and underinsured patients, respectively (P = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no difference in time from injury to specialist evaluation, time from evaluation to surgery, or postoperative outcomes based on insurance status for pediatric patients with scaphoid fracture nonunions. Although insurance status was not associated with access to care for pediatric scaphoid fracture nonunions at our institution, this information may not be generalizable to other populations, including patients who sustain primary scaphoid fractures and who have not yet developed nonunions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective cohort study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"64-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002864\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前还没有研究评估保险或社会经济地位对儿童舟状骨不连的治疗和预后的影响。我们评估了保险状况与以下因素之间是否存在关联:(1)从受伤到手外科医生评估的时间,(2)从专家评估到手术的时间,以及(3)儿童舟状骨骨折不愈合的术后结果。方法:对2015年1月至2021年4月在一家大型三级儿科医院接受舟状骨骨折不愈合手术治疗的患者进行图表回顾。保险不足的患者被定义为没有医疗保险或医疗补助/国家资助保险的患者。结果:参保患者21例,参保不足患者17例。两组患者的年龄、种族和骨折特征均无差异。私人保险组从受伤到手外科医生评估的平均时间为192 SD 195天,而未投保组为155 SD 205天(P = 0.57)。从专家评估到手术治疗的平均时间,私人参保组为35 SD 54天,未参保组为31 SD 31天(P = 0.82)。初次手术后,80%的私人保险患者与88%的保险不足患者实现了联合(P = 0.67)。在私人保险和未充分保险的患者中,存在残余疼痛的患者比例(15% vs 19%)、活动范围缺陷(38% vs 40%)、力量缺陷(6% vs 7%)和恢复活动(94% vs 93%)分别没有差异(P = 1.00)。结论:儿童舟状骨骨折不愈合患者从受伤到专家评估的时间、从评估到手术的时间或基于保险状况的术后结果没有差异。虽然保险状况与我们机构的儿童舟状骨骨折不愈合护理的可及性无关,但这一信息可能无法推广到其他人群,包括原发性舟状骨骨折和尚未发生不愈合的患者。证据等级:iii级回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Scaphoid Nonunions: Does Insurance Status Play a Role?

Objective: There are no studies that evaluate the effects that insurance or socioeconomic status may have on treatment and outcomes of scaphoid nonunions in children. We evaluated whether there is an association between insurance status and (1) time from injury to hand surgeon evaluation, (2) time from specialist evaluation to surgery, and (3) postoperative outcomes of scaphoid fracture nonunions in children.

Methods: A chart review was performed for patients who underwent surgical treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion from January 2015 and April 2021 at a large tertiary care pediatric hospital. Underinsured patients were defined as those with no medical insurance or Medicaid/state-funded insurance.

Results: There were 21 privately insured patients and 17 patients who were underinsured. There was no difference in age, race, or fracture characteristics between the two groups. The mean time between injury and hand surgeon evaluation was 192 SD 195 days for the privately insured group compared with 155 SD 205 days for the underinsured group (P = 0.57). The mean time between specialist evaluation and surgical treatment was 35 SD 54 days for the privately insured group and 31 SD 31 days for the underinsured group (P = 0.82). Union was achieved in 80% of patients with private insurance compared with 88% of underinsured patients after primary surgery (P = 0.67). There was no difference detected in the proportion of patients who had residual pain (15% vs 19%), range of motion deficits (38% vs 40%), strength deficit (6% vs 7%), and return to activity (94% vs 93%) between privately insured and underinsured patients, respectively (P = 1.00).

Conclusions: There was no difference in time from injury to specialist evaluation, time from evaluation to surgery, or postoperative outcomes based on insurance status for pediatric patients with scaphoid fracture nonunions. Although insurance status was not associated with access to care for pediatric scaphoid fracture nonunions at our institution, this information may not be generalizable to other populations, including patients who sustain primary scaphoid fractures and who have not yet developed nonunions.

Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信