Ruth Álvarez Cabellos, Jon Cacicedo, Susana Redondo Capafons, Heidi De Los Santos Real, Miriam Brines Julián, Darío Rubio-Rodríguez, Carlos Rubio-Terrés
{"title":"西妥昔单抗联合放疗与单独放疗在西班牙治疗局部晚期头颈癌的成本-效果","authors":"Ruth Álvarez Cabellos, Jon Cacicedo, Susana Redondo Capafons, Heidi De Los Santos Real, Miriam Brines Julián, Darío Rubio-Rodríguez, Carlos Rubio-Terrés","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To estimate the cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone, for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients in Spain. <b>Methods:</b> A probabilistic Markov model (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) with a five-year time horizon and quarterly Markov cycles was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS). <b>Results:</b> The additional cost and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain per patient receiving radiotherapy in combination with cetuximab compared with radiotherapy alone was €4356 (95% CI: €4350-4362) and 0.2380 (95% CI: 0.2370-0.2391) QALY, respectively. The incremental cost per QALY gain was €18,303 (95% CI: €18,243-18,354) with a probability of cost-effectiveness of 65.4% for a willingness to pay of €30,000 per QALY gained. <b>Conclusion:</b> According to the results of this analysis, the addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy would be a cost-effective alternative to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab combined with radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Álvarez Cabellos, Jon Cacicedo, Susana Redondo Capafons, Heidi De Los Santos Real, Miriam Brines Julián, Darío Rubio-Rodríguez, Carlos Rubio-Terrés\",\"doi\":\"10.57264/cer-2024-0116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To estimate the cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone, for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients in Spain. <b>Methods:</b> A probabilistic Markov model (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) with a five-year time horizon and quarterly Markov cycles was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS). <b>Results:</b> The additional cost and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain per patient receiving radiotherapy in combination with cetuximab compared with radiotherapy alone was €4356 (95% CI: €4350-4362) and 0.2380 (95% CI: 0.2370-0.2391) QALY, respectively. The incremental cost per QALY gain was €18,303 (95% CI: €18,243-18,354) with a probability of cost-effectiveness of 65.4% for a willingness to pay of €30,000 per QALY gained. <b>Conclusion:</b> According to the results of this analysis, the addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy would be a cost-effective alternative to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer in Spain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e240116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773860/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab combined with radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer in Spain.
Aim: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone, for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients in Spain. Methods: A probabilistic Markov model (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) with a five-year time horizon and quarterly Markov cycles was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Results: The additional cost and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain per patient receiving radiotherapy in combination with cetuximab compared with radiotherapy alone was €4356 (95% CI: €4350-4362) and 0.2380 (95% CI: 0.2370-0.2391) QALY, respectively. The incremental cost per QALY gain was €18,303 (95% CI: €18,243-18,354) with a probability of cost-effectiveness of 65.4% for a willingness to pay of €30,000 per QALY gained. Conclusion: According to the results of this analysis, the addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy would be a cost-effective alternative to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer in Spain.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies.
Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.