Jian Li, Bing Yang, Lei Guo, Wenqi Huang, Qiong Hu, Hongting Yan, Rong Tan, Dongxin Tang
{"title":"研究血液和尿液生物标志物与泌尿系统癌症风险的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机研究和共定位分析。","authors":"Jian Li, Bing Yang, Lei Guo, Wenqi Huang, Qiong Hu, Hongting Yan, Rong Tan, Dongxin Tang","doi":"10.7150/jca.103669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Establishing the causal links between biomarkers and cancer enhances understanding of risk factors and facilitates the discovery of therapeutic targets. To this end, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) and colocalization analysis to explore the causal relationship of blood and urinary biomarkers (BUBs) with urological cancers (UCs). <b>Methods:</b> First, we used a two-sample MR study to explore the causal relationship between 33 BUBs and 4 UCs, while we performed reverse Mendelian randomization. After Bonferroni correction, for BUB and UC with significant causality we confirmed the direct causality by multivariate MR adjusting for relevant risk factors. We also applied two-step MR analysis to further explore the possible mediators between BUB and UC with significant causality, while colocalization analysis was performed for BUB, UC and possible mediators. Sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the results. <b>Results:</b> A two-sample MR study found that there were 8 BUBs of CA, IGF-1, LPA, TP, CRE, BILD, TBIL and NAP with potential causality with some UCs (p<0.05), but after Bonferroni correction only IGF-1 had a significant causality with PCa (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.23; p=0.0006<0.05/33). Moreover, the causal relationship between IGF-1 and PCa remained significant (P<0.05) after adjusting for relevant risk factors in the multivariate MR study. The two-step MR study found SHBG to be a mediator between IGF-1 and PCa, and the colocalization analysis found that there was a common causal variant (nearby gene TNS3) between IGF-1 and SHBG (PPH4=93.21%), which further confirmed the mediating effect of SHBG. <b>Conclusion:</b> Strong evidence from our study suggests that IGF-1 increases the risk of PCa by decreasing SHBG levels, and in addition some BUBs were found to have a potential causal relationship with UCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"16 3","pages":"1020-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating causal relationships of blood and urine biomarkers with urological cancer risks: a mendelian randomization study and colocalization analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Jian Li, Bing Yang, Lei Guo, Wenqi Huang, Qiong Hu, Hongting Yan, Rong Tan, Dongxin Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.7150/jca.103669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Establishing the causal links between biomarkers and cancer enhances understanding of risk factors and facilitates the discovery of therapeutic targets. To this end, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) and colocalization analysis to explore the causal relationship of blood and urinary biomarkers (BUBs) with urological cancers (UCs). <b>Methods:</b> First, we used a two-sample MR study to explore the causal relationship between 33 BUBs and 4 UCs, while we performed reverse Mendelian randomization. After Bonferroni correction, for BUB and UC with significant causality we confirmed the direct causality by multivariate MR adjusting for relevant risk factors. We also applied two-step MR analysis to further explore the possible mediators between BUB and UC with significant causality, while colocalization analysis was performed for BUB, UC and possible mediators. Sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the results. <b>Results:</b> A two-sample MR study found that there were 8 BUBs of CA, IGF-1, LPA, TP, CRE, BILD, TBIL and NAP with potential causality with some UCs (p<0.05), but after Bonferroni correction only IGF-1 had a significant causality with PCa (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.23; p=0.0006<0.05/33). Moreover, the causal relationship between IGF-1 and PCa remained significant (P<0.05) after adjusting for relevant risk factors in the multivariate MR study. The two-step MR study found SHBG to be a mediator between IGF-1 and PCa, and the colocalization analysis found that there was a common causal variant (nearby gene TNS3) between IGF-1 and SHBG (PPH4=93.21%), which further confirmed the mediating effect of SHBG. <b>Conclusion:</b> Strong evidence from our study suggests that IGF-1 increases the risk of PCa by decreasing SHBG levels, and in addition some BUBs were found to have a potential causal relationship with UCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"1020-1031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.103669\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.103669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating causal relationships of blood and urine biomarkers with urological cancer risks: a mendelian randomization study and colocalization analyses.
Background: Establishing the causal links between biomarkers and cancer enhances understanding of risk factors and facilitates the discovery of therapeutic targets. To this end, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) and colocalization analysis to explore the causal relationship of blood and urinary biomarkers (BUBs) with urological cancers (UCs). Methods: First, we used a two-sample MR study to explore the causal relationship between 33 BUBs and 4 UCs, while we performed reverse Mendelian randomization. After Bonferroni correction, for BUB and UC with significant causality we confirmed the direct causality by multivariate MR adjusting for relevant risk factors. We also applied two-step MR analysis to further explore the possible mediators between BUB and UC with significant causality, while colocalization analysis was performed for BUB, UC and possible mediators. Sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results: A two-sample MR study found that there were 8 BUBs of CA, IGF-1, LPA, TP, CRE, BILD, TBIL and NAP with potential causality with some UCs (p<0.05), but after Bonferroni correction only IGF-1 had a significant causality with PCa (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06-1.23; p=0.0006<0.05/33). Moreover, the causal relationship between IGF-1 and PCa remained significant (P<0.05) after adjusting for relevant risk factors in the multivariate MR study. The two-step MR study found SHBG to be a mediator between IGF-1 and PCa, and the colocalization analysis found that there was a common causal variant (nearby gene TNS3) between IGF-1 and SHBG (PPH4=93.21%), which further confirmed the mediating effect of SHBG. Conclusion: Strong evidence from our study suggests that IGF-1 increases the risk of PCa by decreasing SHBG levels, and in addition some BUBs were found to have a potential causal relationship with UCs.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.