Nancy L Bartlett, Uwe Hahn, Won-Seog Kim, Isabelle Fleury, Kamel Laribi, Juan-Miguel Bergua, Krimo Bouabdallah, Nicholas Forward, Fontanet Bijou, David MacDonald, Craig A Portell, Herve Ghesquieres, Grzegorz Nowakowski, Christopher A Yasenchak, Monica Patterson, Linda Ho, Evelyn Rustia, Michelle Fanale, Fei Jie, Jeong-A Kim
{"title":"布伦妥昔单抗联合维多汀治疗复发性弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤。","authors":"Nancy L Bartlett, Uwe Hahn, Won-Seog Kim, Isabelle Fleury, Kamel Laribi, Juan-Miguel Bergua, Krimo Bouabdallah, Nicholas Forward, Fontanet Bijou, David MacDonald, Craig A Portell, Herve Ghesquieres, Grzegorz Nowakowski, Christopher A Yasenchak, Monica Patterson, Linda Ho, Evelyn Rustia, Michelle Fanale, Fei Jie, Jeong-A Kim","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided <i>P</i> = .0232 as the efficacy boundary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided <i>P</i> = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided <i>P</i> < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided <i>P</i> < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2402242"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brentuximab Vedotin Combination for Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy L Bartlett, Uwe Hahn, Won-Seog Kim, Isabelle Fleury, Kamel Laribi, Juan-Miguel Bergua, Krimo Bouabdallah, Nicholas Forward, Fontanet Bijou, David MacDonald, Craig A Portell, Herve Ghesquieres, Grzegorz Nowakowski, Christopher A Yasenchak, Monica Patterson, Linda Ho, Evelyn Rustia, Michelle Fanale, Fei Jie, Jeong-A Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-02242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided <i>P</i> = .0232 as the efficacy boundary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided <i>P</i> = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided <i>P</i> < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided <i>P</i> < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2402242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02242\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02242","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在复发或难治性(R/R)弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中,brentuximab vedotin (BV)单药治疗或与来那度胺(Len)或利妥昔单抗(R)联合治疗已显示出疗效和可接受的安全性。我们评估了BV + Len + R与安慰剂+ Len + R在R/R DLBCL患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:ECHELON-3是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、3期临床试验,比较BV + Len + R与安慰剂+ Len + R在R/R DLBCL患者中的疗效。患者每3周服用BV或安慰剂1次,Len每天1次,R每3周1次。主要终点是总生存期(OS),次要终点包括研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。在134例OS事件发生后进行预先指定的中期分析,双侧P = 0.0232为疗效边界。结果:患者(N = 230)随机分为BV + Len + R组(N = 112)或安慰剂+ Len + R组(N = 118)。安慰剂组的两名患者没有接受治疗。中位随访时间为16.4个月,BV + Len + R组的中位OS为13.8个月,而安慰剂+ Len + R组的中位OS为8.5个月(风险比为0.63 [95% CI, 0.45至0.89];双侧P = .009)。BV + Len + R组的中位PFS为4.2个月,而安慰剂+ Len + R组的中位PFS为2.6个月(风险比为0.53 [95% CI, 0.38至0.73];双侧P < .001)。ORR为64% ([95% CI, 55 ~ 73];双侧P < 0.001)为BV + Len + R组,安慰剂+ Len + R组为42% (95% CI, 33 ~ 51);完全缓解率分别为40%和19%。治疗后出现的不良事件(ae)在两组患者中均占97%。在两组中,治疗后最常见的不良反应是中性粒细胞减少症、血小板减少症、腹泻和贫血。结论:BV + Len + R在重度预处理的R/R DLBCL患者中具有统计学上显著的生存获益和可管理的安全性。
Brentuximab Vedotin Combination for Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Purpose: In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL.
Methods: ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided P = .0232 as the efficacy boundary.
Results: Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided P = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided P < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided P < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia.
Conclusion: BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.