罕见病药物中HTA价值评估框架的发展:来自巴西德尔菲研究的见解。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Luiza Vasconcelos Biglia, Arturo Felippini, Tatiane Bomfim Ribeiro, Tácio de Mendonça Lima, Patricia Melo Aguiar
{"title":"罕见病药物中HTA价值评估框架的发展:来自巴西德尔菲研究的见解。","authors":"Luiza Vasconcelos Biglia, Arturo Felippini, Tatiane Bomfim Ribeiro, Tácio de Mendonça Lima, Patricia Melo Aguiar","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324004835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to propose and validate a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for rare diseases drugs in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed to identify criteria used by HTA agencies in countries with public healthcare systems when evaluating orphan drugs. Based on the findings, a criteria framework for rare disease drugs was proposed for Brazil. Content validity was conducted over three rounds using Delphi technique and content validity ratio (CVR) approach was employed to evaluate the ratings from the eighteen stakeholders (experts and patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine HTA criteria for rare disease drugs were identified to compose the Brazilian framework. After three Delphi rounds, the final value framework comprised fifteen criteria categorized into four domains: disease-related factors, treatment-related factors, social and political factors, and economic factors. Among the most well-rated criteria by the CVR, considering the relevance attribute, were \"relevance of outcomes for a rare disease,\" \"impact on patient's quality of life,\" \"price negotiation,\" and \"adjusted cost-effectiveness threshold.\" On the other hand, \"budget impact threshold,\" \"innovative nature of treatment,\" and \"willingness to accept greater uncertainty in clinical evidence\" received negative evaluations and were excluded from the final framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A value assessment framework validated by key stakeholders of rare diseases in Brazil could contribute to improve HTA transparency, decision making, and efficiency of the healthcare system, and inspire the development of a local guidance for rare-disease HTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Luiza Vasconcelos Biglia, Arturo Felippini, Tatiane Bomfim Ribeiro, Tácio de Mendonça Lima, Patricia Melo Aguiar\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462324004835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to propose and validate a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for rare diseases drugs in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed to identify criteria used by HTA agencies in countries with public healthcare systems when evaluating orphan drugs. Based on the findings, a criteria framework for rare disease drugs was proposed for Brazil. Content validity was conducted over three rounds using Delphi technique and content validity ratio (CVR) approach was employed to evaluate the ratings from the eighteen stakeholders (experts and patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine HTA criteria for rare disease drugs were identified to compose the Brazilian framework. After three Delphi rounds, the final value framework comprised fifteen criteria categorized into four domains: disease-related factors, treatment-related factors, social and political factors, and economic factors. Among the most well-rated criteria by the CVR, considering the relevance attribute, were \\\"relevance of outcomes for a rare disease,\\\" \\\"impact on patient's quality of life,\\\" \\\"price negotiation,\\\" and \\\"adjusted cost-effectiveness threshold.\\\" On the other hand, \\\"budget impact threshold,\\\" \\\"innovative nature of treatment,\\\" and \\\"willingness to accept greater uncertainty in clinical evidence\\\" received negative evaluations and were excluded from the final framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A value assessment framework validated by key stakeholders of rare diseases in Brazil could contribute to improve HTA transparency, decision making, and efficiency of the healthcare system, and inspire the development of a local guidance for rare-disease HTA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811954/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324004835\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324004835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是提出和验证巴西罕见病药物卫生技术评估(HTA)的价值评估框架。方法:进行范围审查,以确定HTA机构在具有公共卫生系统的国家评估孤儿药时使用的标准。根据这些发现,为巴西提出了罕见病药物的标准框架。采用德尔菲法进行三轮内容效度评估,采用内容效度比(CVR)法对18位利益相关者(专家和患者)的评分进行评估。结果:确定了29个罕见病药物的HTA标准,组成了巴西框架。经过三轮德尔菲,最终的价值框架包括15个标准,分为四个领域:疾病相关因素、治疗相关因素、社会和政治因素以及经济因素。考虑到相关性属性,CVR评价最高的标准是“罕见疾病结果的相关性”、“对患者生活质量的影响”、“价格谈判”和“调整后的成本效益阈值”。另一方面,“预算影响阈值”、“治疗的创新性”和“接受临床证据更大不确定性的意愿”得到了负面评价,并被排除在最终框架之外。结论:巴西罕见病关键利益相关者验证的价值评估框架有助于提高HTA的透明度、决策和卫生保健系统的效率,并激励制定当地罕见病HTA指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment in rare diseases drugs: insights from a Delphi study in Brazil.

Objective: The aim of this study is to propose and validate a value assessment framework for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for rare diseases drugs in Brazil.

Methods: A scoping review was performed to identify criteria used by HTA agencies in countries with public healthcare systems when evaluating orphan drugs. Based on the findings, a criteria framework for rare disease drugs was proposed for Brazil. Content validity was conducted over three rounds using Delphi technique and content validity ratio (CVR) approach was employed to evaluate the ratings from the eighteen stakeholders (experts and patients).

Results: Twenty-nine HTA criteria for rare disease drugs were identified to compose the Brazilian framework. After three Delphi rounds, the final value framework comprised fifteen criteria categorized into four domains: disease-related factors, treatment-related factors, social and political factors, and economic factors. Among the most well-rated criteria by the CVR, considering the relevance attribute, were "relevance of outcomes for a rare disease," "impact on patient's quality of life," "price negotiation," and "adjusted cost-effectiveness threshold." On the other hand, "budget impact threshold," "innovative nature of treatment," and "willingness to accept greater uncertainty in clinical evidence" received negative evaluations and were excluded from the final framework.

Conclusions: A value assessment framework validated by key stakeholders of rare diseases in Brazil could contribute to improve HTA transparency, decision making, and efficiency of the healthcare system, and inspire the development of a local guidance for rare-disease HTA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信