利益相关者对实施慢性病研究零美元共同支付计划的促进因素和障碍的看法。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Debra Winberg, Elizabeth Nauman, Lizheng Shi, Brice L Mohundro, Kelly Louis, Eboni G Price-Haywood, Tiange Tang, Alessandra N Bazzano
{"title":"利益相关者对实施慢性病研究零美元共同支付计划的促进因素和障碍的看法。","authors":"Debra Winberg, Elizabeth Nauman, Lizheng Shi, Brice L Mohundro, Kelly Louis, Eboni G Price-Haywood, Tiange Tang, Alessandra N Bazzano","doi":"10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains a pressing public health concern. Despite advancements in antidiabetic medications, suboptimal medication adherence persists among many individuals with T2D, often due to the high cost of medications. To combat this issue, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana (Blue Cross) introduced the $0 Drug Copay (ZDC) program, providing $0 copays for select drugs. This study sought to explore barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation of Blue Cross's ZDC program (updated version).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus group discussions and interviews were conducted with health plan leadership, health coaches and providers who participate in the health plan organization's healthcare quality improvement program. Focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and July 2023. Discussion guides were developed collaboratively and tailored to each participant group. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo<sup>®</sup> qualitative analysis software. A descriptive, qualitative analysis was conducted, resulting in the identification of seven codes and subsequent candidate themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 participants were interviewed: 6 were Blue Cross administrators, 5 were health coaches and 4 were Quality Blue providers. Overall, participants had positive feedback on the ZDC program and perceived that it has significant benefits for patients and the health system but could be improved, and four themes related to implementation barriers and facilitators, effectiveness and potential areas of improvement were identified: (1) the ZDC program reduces friction for patients, prescribers and the health system; (2) the program is aligned with the values of health systems, insurers and providers, facilitating implementation success; (3) expanding coverage (drug classes and conditions) and education (for providers and patients) could maximize program benefits; and (4) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) did not negatively impact program administration because the $0 copay was programmed at the benefit level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ZDC program aligns goals and can benefit patients, providers and patients. The program can have the largest potential if it is expanded to include new medications and new conditions, and if there is more education for patients and providers. Regardless of challenges, reduced-copay programs have the potential to improve medication adherence, improve HbA1C control and improve overall health outcomes. Trial Registration This study was approved by the Tulane University Institutional Review Board, IRB #2020-1986.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.\",\"authors\":\"Debra Winberg, Elizabeth Nauman, Lizheng Shi, Brice L Mohundro, Kelly Louis, Eboni G Price-Haywood, Tiange Tang, Alessandra N Bazzano\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains a pressing public health concern. Despite advancements in antidiabetic medications, suboptimal medication adherence persists among many individuals with T2D, often due to the high cost of medications. To combat this issue, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana (Blue Cross) introduced the $0 Drug Copay (ZDC) program, providing $0 copays for select drugs. This study sought to explore barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation of Blue Cross's ZDC program (updated version).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Focus group discussions and interviews were conducted with health plan leadership, health coaches and providers who participate in the health plan organization's healthcare quality improvement program. Focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and July 2023. Discussion guides were developed collaboratively and tailored to each participant group. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo<sup>®</sup> qualitative analysis software. A descriptive, qualitative analysis was conducted, resulting in the identification of seven codes and subsequent candidate themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 15 participants were interviewed: 6 were Blue Cross administrators, 5 were health coaches and 4 were Quality Blue providers. Overall, participants had positive feedback on the ZDC program and perceived that it has significant benefits for patients and the health system but could be improved, and four themes related to implementation barriers and facilitators, effectiveness and potential areas of improvement were identified: (1) the ZDC program reduces friction for patients, prescribers and the health system; (2) the program is aligned with the values of health systems, insurers and providers, facilitating implementation success; (3) expanding coverage (drug classes and conditions) and education (for providers and patients) could maximize program benefits; and (4) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) did not negatively impact program administration because the $0 copay was programmed at the benefit level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ZDC program aligns goals and can benefit patients, providers and patients. The program can have the largest potential if it is expanded to include new medications and new conditions, and if there is more education for patients and providers. Regardless of challenges, reduced-copay programs have the potential to improve medication adherence, improve HbA1C control and improve overall health outcomes. Trial Registration This study was approved by the Tulane University Institutional Review Board, IRB #2020-1986.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702045/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)仍然是一个紧迫的公共卫生问题。尽管抗糖尿病药物取得了进步,但许多T2D患者的药物依从性仍然不理想,这通常是由于药物成本高。为了解决这个问题,蓝十字和路易斯安那州蓝盾(蓝十字)推出了0美元药物共同支付(ZDC)计划,为选定的药物提供0美元的共同支付。本研究旨在探索成功实施蓝十字ZDC计划(更新版本)的障碍和促进因素。方法:对参与健康计划组织卫生保健质量改进项目的健康计划领导、健康教练和提供者进行焦点小组讨论和访谈。焦点小组讨论和半结构化访谈在2022年10月至2023年7月期间进行。讨论指南是协作开发的,并为每个参与者组量身定制。访谈记录、转录和分析使用NVivo®定性分析软件。进行了描述性定性分析,确定了七个代码和随后的候选主题。结果:共访谈15名参与者,其中6名是蓝十字管理人员,5名是健康教练,4名是优质蓝服务提供者。总体而言,参与者对ZDC计划有积极的反馈,并认为它对患者和卫生系统有显著的好处,但可以改进,并确定了与实施障碍和促进因素、有效性和潜在改进领域相关的四个主题:(1)ZDC计划减少了患者、处方者和卫生系统之间的摩擦;(2)该规划与卫生系统、保险公司和提供者的价值观相一致,有助于成功实施;(3)扩大覆盖范围(药物类别和条件)和教育(提供者和患者)可以最大化项目效益;(4) 2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)没有对项目管理产生负面影响,因为0美元的共同支付是在福利水平上规划的。结论:ZDC项目目标一致,可以使患者、提供者和患者受益。如果扩大到包括新药物和新疾病,如果对患者和提供者进行更多的教育,该项目将发挥最大的潜力。无论面临何种挑战,减少共付费用的项目都有可能提高药物依从性,改善HbA1C控制并改善整体健康状况。本研究已获得杜兰大学机构审查委员会(IRB #2020-1986)批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains a pressing public health concern. Despite advancements in antidiabetic medications, suboptimal medication adherence persists among many individuals with T2D, often due to the high cost of medications. To combat this issue, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana (Blue Cross) introduced the $0 Drug Copay (ZDC) program, providing $0 copays for select drugs. This study sought to explore barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation of Blue Cross's ZDC program (updated version).

Methods: Focus group discussions and interviews were conducted with health plan leadership, health coaches and providers who participate in the health plan organization's healthcare quality improvement program. Focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and July 2023. Discussion guides were developed collaboratively and tailored to each participant group. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo® qualitative analysis software. A descriptive, qualitative analysis was conducted, resulting in the identification of seven codes and subsequent candidate themes.

Results: In total, 15 participants were interviewed: 6 were Blue Cross administrators, 5 were health coaches and 4 were Quality Blue providers. Overall, participants had positive feedback on the ZDC program and perceived that it has significant benefits for patients and the health system but could be improved, and four themes related to implementation barriers and facilitators, effectiveness and potential areas of improvement were identified: (1) the ZDC program reduces friction for patients, prescribers and the health system; (2) the program is aligned with the values of health systems, insurers and providers, facilitating implementation success; (3) expanding coverage (drug classes and conditions) and education (for providers and patients) could maximize program benefits; and (4) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) did not negatively impact program administration because the $0 copay was programmed at the benefit level.

Conclusions: The ZDC program aligns goals and can benefit patients, providers and patients. The program can have the largest potential if it is expanded to include new medications and new conditions, and if there is more education for patients and providers. Regardless of challenges, reduced-copay programs have the potential to improve medication adherence, improve HbA1C control and improve overall health outcomes. Trial Registration This study was approved by the Tulane University Institutional Review Board, IRB #2020-1986.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信