澳大利亚政府补贴药品的共同支付减少的短期影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mohammad Afshar Ali, Firouzeh Noghrehchi, Christine Y Lu
{"title":"澳大利亚政府补贴药品的共同支付减少的短期影响。","authors":"Mohammad Afshar Ali, Firouzeh Noghrehchi, Christine Y Lu","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2451140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to examine the short-term, population-level effects of the 2023 Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) copayment reduction on prescription volume, patients' out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure, and government contributions.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a quasi-experimental study using national data from January 2021 to April 2024. For system-level analysis, we examined all drugs used by general patients, focusing on 252 drugs that were 'above copayment' during 2022-2023. We also performed drug category-specific analyses on six broad groups of drugs. Paired-sample t-tests and segmented regression analyses were used to compare prescription volumes, OOP expenditure, and government contributions before and after the copayment reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The copayment reduction was not associated with significant changes in prescription volumes or government contributions for general patients. However, the copayment reduction led to an immediate, but not gradual, decrease in inflation-adjusted OOP expenditure. Specifically, there was a relative reduction of 26.1% at 15 months post-policy for drugs above the general copayment (95% confidence interval (CI): -34.10, -18.10; p-value < 0.001). Similar immediate declines were observed across the six selected drug categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is needed to assess the longer-term effects of copayment reductions, particularly their impact on medication adherence and overall healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"567-576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The short-term impact of copayment reductions for government subsidised medicines in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Afshar Ali, Firouzeh Noghrehchi, Christine Y Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2451140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to examine the short-term, population-level effects of the 2023 Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) copayment reduction on prescription volume, patients' out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure, and government contributions.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a quasi-experimental study using national data from January 2021 to April 2024. For system-level analysis, we examined all drugs used by general patients, focusing on 252 drugs that were 'above copayment' during 2022-2023. We also performed drug category-specific analyses on six broad groups of drugs. Paired-sample t-tests and segmented regression analyses were used to compare prescription volumes, OOP expenditure, and government contributions before and after the copayment reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The copayment reduction was not associated with significant changes in prescription volumes or government contributions for general patients. However, the copayment reduction led to an immediate, but not gradual, decrease in inflation-adjusted OOP expenditure. Specifically, there was a relative reduction of 26.1% at 15 months post-policy for drugs above the general copayment (95% confidence interval (CI): -34.10, -18.10; p-value < 0.001). Similar immediate declines were observed across the six selected drug categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further research is needed to assess the longer-term effects of copayment reductions, particularly their impact on medication adherence and overall healthcare costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"567-576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2451140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2451140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在研究2023年澳大利亚药品福利计划(PBS)共同支付额减少对处方量、患者自付(OOP)支出和政府捐款的短期、人口水平影响。研究设计与方法:利用2021年1月至2024年4月的国家数据进行准实验研究。对于系统级分析,我们检查了普通患者使用的所有药物,重点关注2022-2023年期间“高于共同支付”的252种药物。我们还对六大类药物进行了药物分类分析。配对样本t检验和分段回归分析用于比较减少共同支付前后的处方量、OOP支出和政府捐款。结果:共同支付的减少与处方量或政府对普通患者的贡献的显着变化无关。但是,共同支付额的减少导致经通货膨胀调整后的OOP支出立即而不是逐渐减少。具体而言,在保单后15个月,高于一般共同支付的药物相对减少26.1%(95%置信区间(CI): -34.10, -18.10;p值结论:需要进一步的研究来评估共同支付减少的长期影响,特别是它们对药物依从性和总体医疗保健成本的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The short-term impact of copayment reductions for government subsidised medicines in Australia.

Background: This study aims to examine the short-term, population-level effects of the 2023 Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) copayment reduction on prescription volume, patients' out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure, and government contributions.

Research design and methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study using national data from January 2021 to April 2024. For system-level analysis, we examined all drugs used by general patients, focusing on 252 drugs that were 'above copayment' during 2022-2023. We also performed drug category-specific analyses on six broad groups of drugs. Paired-sample t-tests and segmented regression analyses were used to compare prescription volumes, OOP expenditure, and government contributions before and after the copayment reduction.

Results: The copayment reduction was not associated with significant changes in prescription volumes or government contributions for general patients. However, the copayment reduction led to an immediate, but not gradual, decrease in inflation-adjusted OOP expenditure. Specifically, there was a relative reduction of 26.1% at 15 months post-policy for drugs above the general copayment (95% confidence interval (CI): -34.10, -18.10; p-value < 0.001). Similar immediate declines were observed across the six selected drug categories.

Conclusions: Further research is needed to assess the longer-term effects of copayment reductions, particularly their impact on medication adherence and overall healthcare costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信