Isaac D Smith, Bryant R England, Neha J Pagidipati, Hayden Bosworth
{"title":"类风湿关节炎的药物依从性:对美国退伍军人心血管疾病风险和策略的影响","authors":"Isaac D Smith, Bryant R England, Neha J Pagidipati, Hayden Bosworth","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2451141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and premature mortality. The risk of CVD is closely associated with RA disease activity, and achieving RA remission using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can significantly mitigate this risk. However, despite the availability of highly effective DMARDs, many veterans fail to achieve sustained RA remission.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We will discuss DMARD adherence in U.S. veterans with RA as it relates to RA disease activity and CVD risk, describe factors associated with DMARD non-adherence in individuals with RA, and discuss intervention strategies to improve DMARD adherence. For this review, the authors performed an extensive literature search using Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Duke University library resources.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Barriers to DMARD adherence in veterans with RA are multifactorial and include patient-related factors, systemic barriers, and suboptimal adherence screening practices. Additional research is needed to create validated screening tools for DMARD adherence, train rheumatology providers on how to assess DMARD adherence, develop effective interventions to promote veteran self-efficacy in DMARD management, and to learn how to sustainably utilize multidisciplinary resources to support DMARD adherence in veterans with RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"473-485"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for cardiovascular disease risk and strategies to address in U.S. veterans.\",\"authors\":\"Isaac D Smith, Bryant R England, Neha J Pagidipati, Hayden Bosworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2451141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and premature mortality. The risk of CVD is closely associated with RA disease activity, and achieving RA remission using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can significantly mitigate this risk. However, despite the availability of highly effective DMARDs, many veterans fail to achieve sustained RA remission.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We will discuss DMARD adherence in U.S. veterans with RA as it relates to RA disease activity and CVD risk, describe factors associated with DMARD non-adherence in individuals with RA, and discuss intervention strategies to improve DMARD adherence. For this review, the authors performed an extensive literature search using Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Duke University library resources.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Barriers to DMARD adherence in veterans with RA are multifactorial and include patient-related factors, systemic barriers, and suboptimal adherence screening practices. Additional research is needed to create validated screening tools for DMARD adherence, train rheumatology providers on how to assess DMARD adherence, develop effective interventions to promote veteran self-efficacy in DMARD management, and to learn how to sustainably utilize multidisciplinary resources to support DMARD adherence in veterans with RA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"473-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2451141\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2451141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
类风湿关节炎(RA)是一种全身性炎症性疾病,与心血管疾病(CVD)和过早死亡风险增加相关。CVD的风险与RA疾病活动密切相关,使用改善疾病的抗风湿药物(DMARDs)实现RA缓解可以显著降低这一风险。然而,尽管有高效的dmard,许多退伍军人未能实现持续的RA缓解。涉及领域:我们将讨论与RA疾病活动性和心血管疾病风险相关的美国RA退伍军人DMARD依从性,描述与RA患者DMARD不依从性相关的因素,并讨论改善DMARD依从性的干预策略。在这篇综述中,作者使用Embase、PubMed、谷歌Scholar、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和杜克大学图书馆资源进行了广泛的文献检索。专家意见:类风湿性关节炎退伍军人坚持服用DMARD的障碍是多因素的,包括患者相关因素、系统性障碍和不理想的坚持筛查实践。需要进一步的研究来创建DMARD依从性的有效筛查工具,培训风湿病学提供者如何评估DMARD依从性,开发有效的干预措施以提高DMARD管理中的退伍军人自我效能,并学习如何可持续地利用多学科资源来支持RA退伍军人的DMARD依从性。
Medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for cardiovascular disease risk and strategies to address in U.S. veterans.
Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and premature mortality. The risk of CVD is closely associated with RA disease activity, and achieving RA remission using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can significantly mitigate this risk. However, despite the availability of highly effective DMARDs, many veterans fail to achieve sustained RA remission.
Areas covered: We will discuss DMARD adherence in U.S. veterans with RA as it relates to RA disease activity and CVD risk, describe factors associated with DMARD non-adherence in individuals with RA, and discuss intervention strategies to improve DMARD adherence. For this review, the authors performed an extensive literature search using Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Duke University library resources.
Expert opinion: Barriers to DMARD adherence in veterans with RA are multifactorial and include patient-related factors, systemic barriers, and suboptimal adherence screening practices. Additional research is needed to create validated screening tools for DMARD adherence, train rheumatology providers on how to assess DMARD adherence, develop effective interventions to promote veteran self-efficacy in DMARD management, and to learn how to sustainably utilize multidisciplinary resources to support DMARD adherence in veterans with RA.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.