试验资格标准对1183例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者治疗结果的影响

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Tine Litske Bennedsen, Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Paw Jensen, Peter Brown, Pär Josefsson, Arushi Khurana, Matthew Maurer, Michael Roost Clausen, Andriette Dessau-Arp, Jennifer Bøgh Jørgensen, Judit Jørgensen, Thomas Stauffer Larsen, Lars Møller Pedersen, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly
{"title":"试验资格标准对1183例滤泡性淋巴瘤患者治疗结果的影响","authors":"Tine Litske Bennedsen, Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Paw Jensen, Peter Brown, Pär Josefsson, Arushi Khurana, Matthew Maurer, Michael Roost Clausen, Andriette Dessau-Arp, Jennifer Bøgh Jørgensen, Judit Jørgensen, Thomas Stauffer Larsen, Lars Møller Pedersen, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly","doi":"10.1111/ejh.14373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of new first-line treatments for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) is becoming increasingly challenging due to already excellent survival outcomes. The present study investigated the outcomes of patients with FL who underwent contemporary first-line therapies but would not have been eligible for inclusion in recent trials and explored how commonly used in/exclusion criteria impacted their survival outcomes. This study included adult patients diagnosed with FL in the period 2000-2018 registered in the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Through searches on ClinicalTrials.gov, four recent 1st line phase 3 randomized controlled trials with R-Bendamustine, R-CVP, and/or R-CHOP as control or experimental arms were included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for each trial were retrieved and categorized. Patients were then divided into trial-eligible and ineligible groups according to blood test results correlated to organ function and ECOG performance score (PS). Survival outcomes were significantly worse among trial-ineligible patients, with adjusted differences between trial-eligible and ineligible patients of 12%-20% in five-year overall survival (OS) overall. Inclusion criteria based on PS and renal function were the main drivers of OS differences. More inclusive trials will lead to faster recruitment and secure focus on developing medicines for the group of patients with the worst outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11955,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Trial Eligibility Criteria on Outcomes of 1183 Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Treated in the Real-World Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Tine Litske Bennedsen, Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Paw Jensen, Peter Brown, Pär Josefsson, Arushi Khurana, Matthew Maurer, Michael Roost Clausen, Andriette Dessau-Arp, Jennifer Bøgh Jørgensen, Judit Jørgensen, Thomas Stauffer Larsen, Lars Møller Pedersen, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejh.14373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The development of new first-line treatments for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) is becoming increasingly challenging due to already excellent survival outcomes. The present study investigated the outcomes of patients with FL who underwent contemporary first-line therapies but would not have been eligible for inclusion in recent trials and explored how commonly used in/exclusion criteria impacted their survival outcomes. This study included adult patients diagnosed with FL in the period 2000-2018 registered in the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Through searches on ClinicalTrials.gov, four recent 1st line phase 3 randomized controlled trials with R-Bendamustine, R-CVP, and/or R-CHOP as control or experimental arms were included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for each trial were retrieved and categorized. Patients were then divided into trial-eligible and ineligible groups according to blood test results correlated to organ function and ECOG performance score (PS). Survival outcomes were significantly worse among trial-ineligible patients, with adjusted differences between trial-eligible and ineligible patients of 12%-20% in five-year overall survival (OS) overall. Inclusion criteria based on PS and renal function were the main drivers of OS differences. More inclusive trials will lead to faster recruitment and secure focus on developing medicines for the group of patients with the worst outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14373\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者的生存结果已经很好,因此开发新的一线治疗方法正变得越来越具有挑战性。本研究调查了接受当代一线治疗但不符合近期试验纳入条件的FL患者的结局,并探讨了常用的纳入/排除标准如何影响他们的生存结局。本研究纳入了在丹麦淋巴瘤登记处登记的2000-2018年期间诊断为FL的成年患者。通过在ClinicalTrials.gov网站上的搜索,我们纳入了最近4项以r -苯达莫司汀、R-CVP和/或R-CHOP为对照或实验组的一线3期随机对照试验。检索和分类每个试验的纳入和排除标准。然后根据与器官功能相关的血液检查结果和ECOG表现评分(PS)将患者分为符合试验条件和不符合试验条件的组。不符合试验条件的患者的生存结果明显更差,符合试验条件的患者和不符合试验条件的患者在总体5年总生存率(OS)方面的调整差异为12%-20%。基于PS和肾功能的纳入标准是OS差异的主要驱动因素。更具包容性的试验将导致更快的招募,并确保将重点放在为结果最差的患者群体开发药物上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Trial Eligibility Criteria on Outcomes of 1183 Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Treated in the Real-World Setting.

The development of new first-line treatments for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) is becoming increasingly challenging due to already excellent survival outcomes. The present study investigated the outcomes of patients with FL who underwent contemporary first-line therapies but would not have been eligible for inclusion in recent trials and explored how commonly used in/exclusion criteria impacted their survival outcomes. This study included adult patients diagnosed with FL in the period 2000-2018 registered in the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Through searches on ClinicalTrials.gov, four recent 1st line phase 3 randomized controlled trials with R-Bendamustine, R-CVP, and/or R-CHOP as control or experimental arms were included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for each trial were retrieved and categorized. Patients were then divided into trial-eligible and ineligible groups according to blood test results correlated to organ function and ECOG performance score (PS). Survival outcomes were significantly worse among trial-ineligible patients, with adjusted differences between trial-eligible and ineligible patients of 12%-20% in five-year overall survival (OS) overall. Inclusion criteria based on PS and renal function were the main drivers of OS differences. More inclusive trials will lead to faster recruitment and secure focus on developing medicines for the group of patients with the worst outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Haematology is an international journal for communication of basic and clinical research in haematology. The journal welcomes manuscripts on molecular, cellular and clinical research on diseases of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue, and on basic molecular and cellular research related to normal development and function of the blood, vascular and lymphatic tissue. The journal also welcomes reviews on clinical haematology and basic research, case reports, and clinical pictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信