Revisiting the Consistency of Financial Disclosure Reporting by Authors at Annual Spine Conferences Show Inconsistent Improvements After 14 Years.

Study design: Cross-sectional study of presenter disclosures from the 2022 North American Spine Society (NASS), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS), and Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) annual research conferences.

Objective: The current study aimed to evaluate the consistency of financial disclosures for authors presenting at multiple 2022 spine conferences and compared results to those previously reported in 2008.

Summary of background data: Transparent reporting of financial relationships between physicians and industry is seen as an important way to limit/address potential bias. Thus, many research conferences require authors to disclose such relationships. Despite these requirements, variability in the financial disclosure reporting for matched speakers at 2008 major spine conferences was previously reported. Since then, the Sunshine Act mandated public financial relationships, potentially furthering attention and leading to improvements in financial disclosures.

Methods: Disclosures of authors presenting at >1 of the three 2022 spine conferences were compiled from conference websites, and discrepancies were determined based on conference disclosure policies. For comparisons where both conferences required disclosure of all relationships, the discrepancy was identified if there was not a match. For comparisons where 1 conference required paper-specific relationships, and the other required all relationships, discrepancy was identified if the first was not a subset of the other. Results were compared with those reported from 2008.

Results: NASS and SRS both required disclosure of all relationships, had 208 overlapping authors, and had 36.5% discrepancies. SRS and CSRS required all and paper-specific disclosures, had 37 overlapping authors, and had 29.7% discrepancies. NASS and CSRS required all and paper-specific disclosures, had 81 overlapping authors, and had 29.6% discrepancies. Overall, the average discrepancy for pairs of conferences in 2008 was 26%, and for 2022 was 32%, indicating a lack of improvement. Compared with 2008, discrepancies decreased more when disclosure requirements were the same for both conferences being considered.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that significant variability remains in the reporting of financial conflicts of interest by authors presenting at 3 major spine conferences last year, despite previous scrutiny and the evolution of the Sunshine Act. These discrepancies may reflect the ambiguity caused by different disclosure policies and further attention is needed for this topic.