精确度和灵敏度：系统评价中文献检索质量的替代指标。

IF 1.6 4区医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001738

Vishal Kumar, Sitanshu Barik, Vikash Raj, Sheshadri Reddy Varikasuvu

{"title":"精确度和灵敏度：系统评价中文献检索质量的替代指标。","authors":"Vishal Kumar, Sitanshu Barik, Vikash Raj, Sheshadri Reddy Varikasuvu","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adequacy of the literature search is one of the critical domains that affect the quality of the systematic review. The aim of a literature search in the systematic review should be to obtain thorough, comprehensive, transparent, and reproducible results. Precision (also called \"positive predictive value\") and sensitivity (also called \"recall\") have been postulated as 2 markers for rating the quality of literature search in systematic reviews. The reporting of such measures shall help in improving the relevance, transparency, reproducibility, and comprehensibility of the search. A search strategy that maximizes sensitivity with reasonable precision shall improve the quality of the review.","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"34-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precision and Sensitivity: A Surrogate for Quality of Literature Search in Systematic Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Vishal Kumar, Sitanshu Barik, Vikash Raj, Sheshadri Reddy Varikasuvu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adequacy of the literature search is one of the critical domains that affect the quality of the systematic review. The aim of a literature search in the systematic review should be to obtain thorough, comprehensive, transparent, and reproducible results. Precision (also called \\\"positive predictive value\\\") and sensitivity (also called \\\"recall\\\") have been postulated as 2 markers for rating the quality of literature search in systematic reviews. The reporting of such measures shall help in improving the relevance, transparency, reproducibility, and comprehensibility of the search. A search strategy that maximizes sensitivity with reasonable precision shall improve the quality of the review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001738\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文献检索的充分性是影响系统评价质量的关键领域之一。系统评价中文献检索的目的应该是获得彻底、全面、透明和可重复的结果。精确度（也称为“阳性预测值”）和灵敏度（也称为“召回率”）被假定为评价系统综述中文献检索质量的两个标记。此类措施的报告应有助于提高检索的相关性、透明度、可重复性和可理解性。在合理的精度下实现灵敏度最大化的搜索策略可以提高综述的质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Precision and Sensitivity: A Surrogate for Quality of Literature Search in Systematic Reviews.

The adequacy of the literature search is one of the critical domains that affect the quality of the systematic review. The aim of a literature search in the systematic review should be to obtain thorough, comprehensive, transparent, and reproducible results. Precision (also called "positive predictive value") and sensitivity (also called "recall") have been postulated as 2 markers for rating the quality of literature search in systematic reviews. The reporting of such measures shall help in improving the relevance, transparency, reproducibility, and comprehensibility of the search. A search strategy that maximizes sensitivity with reasonable precision shall improve the quality of the review.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

236

期刊介绍： Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.