下肢外伤术前阿片类药物使用与再入院和预后的关系?

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Heather Peluso, Sthefano Araya, Heli Patel, Daniel Najafali, Bhavana Thota, Lindsay Talemal, Madison Hackley, Civanni Moss, Sameer A Patel, Adam Walchak
{"title":"下肢外伤术前阿片类药物使用与再入院和预后的关系?","authors":"Heather Peluso, Sthefano Araya, Heli Patel, Daniel Najafali, Bhavana Thota, Lindsay Talemal, Madison Hackley, Civanni Moss, Sameer A Patel, Adam Walchak","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) has been implicated as a potential risk factor for adverse outcomes and readmissions in various surgical procedures. Patients admitted with an open fracture of the lower extremity often have multifarious pain needs, require surgical procedures, and have prolonged rehabilitation; previous OUD complicates this process. Our goal was to describe at a national level how OUD is associated with readmission, complications, and healthcare expenditure for patients admitted with open lower extremity fractures.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Do patients with OUD who were treated for open lower extremity fractures have higher odds of readmission compared with patients without OUD? (2) Do patients with OUD who were treated for open lower extremity fractures have higher healthcare utilization (specifically, length of stay and hospitalization charges and costs)?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, comparative study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, which is the largest nationally representative readmissions database in the United States. Patients were included if they had an ICD-10-CM principal diagnosis of open lower extremity fracture. Between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2019, a total of 17,811 patients were admitted for open lower extremity fractures and entered in the National Readmissions Database. Of the 17,811 patients, 2.3% (410) had a secondary diagnosis of OUD and 97.7% (17,401) did not. The mean age was 46 years for both groups. The most common operative procedure was debridement, and 1.5% of patients received a flap for reconstruction. Opioid disorders were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Ninety-day complications and readmissions were characterized for the calendar year. Patients undergoing flap-based reconstructions were identified with ICD-10-PR codes. Confounders (patient demographic and hospital characteristics) were adjusted for using multivariable regression analysis models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as primary payer, Charlson comorbidity index, Gustillo type, and bone density, we found that patients with OUD had greater odds of readmission after open lower extremity fractures (adjusted OR 1.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.0]; p = 0.03). The 90-day infection occurrence was higher in patients with OUD (adjusted OR 1.96 [95% CI 1.0 to 3.8]; p = 0.049) and was the primary reason for readmission in both groups. Moreover, 11% (11 of 103) of patients with OUD were readmitted with opioid-induced complications, which was exclusively observed in this cohort. Patients with OUD also had longer hospital stays (adjusted mean difference 2.2 days [95% CI 0.5 to 3.8]; p = 0.01) and higher hospitalization charges (adjusted mean difference in USD 34,000 [95% CI 1000 to 66,000]; p = 0.04) and costs (adjusted mean difference in USD 7000 [95% CI 2000 to 13,000]; p = 0.007) than those without OUD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that mitigating infection and opioid overdose, addiction, and constipation in patients with OUD could reduce readmissions in lower extremity fracture patients. Future research should focus on antibiotic and wound care compliance and the early and frequent engagement of postoperative opioid addiction support services.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"918-927"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Is Preoperative Opioid Use Associated With Readmissions and Outcomes in Lower Extremity Trauma?\",\"authors\":\"Heather Peluso, Sthefano Araya, Heli Patel, Daniel Najafali, Bhavana Thota, Lindsay Talemal, Madison Hackley, Civanni Moss, Sameer A Patel, Adam Walchak\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) has been implicated as a potential risk factor for adverse outcomes and readmissions in various surgical procedures. Patients admitted with an open fracture of the lower extremity often have multifarious pain needs, require surgical procedures, and have prolonged rehabilitation; previous OUD complicates this process. Our goal was to describe at a national level how OUD is associated with readmission, complications, and healthcare expenditure for patients admitted with open lower extremity fractures.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Do patients with OUD who were treated for open lower extremity fractures have higher odds of readmission compared with patients without OUD? (2) Do patients with OUD who were treated for open lower extremity fractures have higher healthcare utilization (specifically, length of stay and hospitalization charges and costs)?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, comparative study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, which is the largest nationally representative readmissions database in the United States. Patients were included if they had an ICD-10-CM principal diagnosis of open lower extremity fracture. Between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2019, a total of 17,811 patients were admitted for open lower extremity fractures and entered in the National Readmissions Database. Of the 17,811 patients, 2.3% (410) had a secondary diagnosis of OUD and 97.7% (17,401) did not. The mean age was 46 years for both groups. The most common operative procedure was debridement, and 1.5% of patients received a flap for reconstruction. Opioid disorders were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Ninety-day complications and readmissions were characterized for the calendar year. Patients undergoing flap-based reconstructions were identified with ICD-10-PR codes. Confounders (patient demographic and hospital characteristics) were adjusted for using multivariable regression analysis models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as primary payer, Charlson comorbidity index, Gustillo type, and bone density, we found that patients with OUD had greater odds of readmission after open lower extremity fractures (adjusted OR 1.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.0]; p = 0.03). The 90-day infection occurrence was higher in patients with OUD (adjusted OR 1.96 [95% CI 1.0 to 3.8]; p = 0.049) and was the primary reason for readmission in both groups. Moreover, 11% (11 of 103) of patients with OUD were readmitted with opioid-induced complications, which was exclusively observed in this cohort. Patients with OUD also had longer hospital stays (adjusted mean difference 2.2 days [95% CI 0.5 to 3.8]; p = 0.01) and higher hospitalization charges (adjusted mean difference in USD 34,000 [95% CI 1000 to 66,000]; p = 0.04) and costs (adjusted mean difference in USD 7000 [95% CI 2000 to 13,000]; p = 0.007) than those without OUD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that mitigating infection and opioid overdose, addiction, and constipation in patients with OUD could reduce readmissions in lower extremity fracture patients. Future research should focus on antibiotic and wound care compliance and the early and frequent engagement of postoperative opioid addiction support services.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, therapeutic study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"918-927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003346\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)已被认为是各种外科手术中不良结果和再入院的潜在危险因素。下肢开放性骨折入院的患者通常有多种疼痛需求,需要手术治疗,并需要长期康复;先前的OUD使这一过程复杂化。我们的目标是在全国范围内描述OUD与开放性下肢骨折患者再入院、并发症和医疗费用的关系。问题/目的:(1)与非OUD患者相比,接受开放性下肢骨折治疗的OUD患者是否有更高的再入院几率?(2)接受开放性下肢骨折治疗的OUD患者是否有更高的医疗保健利用率(特别是住院时间和住院费用和费用)?方法:这是一项回顾性比较研究,使用全国再入院数据库,这是美国最大的全国代表性再入院数据库。如果患者的ICD-10-CM主要诊断为开放性下肢骨折,则纳入患者。2019年1月1日至2019年9月30日期间,共有17811名患者因开放性下肢骨折入院,并被录入国家再入院数据库。在17,811例患者中,2.3%(410)有OUD的二次诊断,97.7%(17,401)没有。两组患者的平均年龄均为46岁。最常见的手术是清创,1.5%的患者接受皮瓣重建。使用ICD-10-CM代码识别阿片类疾病。90天并发症和再入院的特征为日历年。采用ICD-10-PR编码对接受皮瓣重建的患者进行鉴定。使用多变量回归分析模型调整混杂因素(患者人口统计学和医院特征)。结果:在控制了潜在的混杂变量,如主要支撑者、Charlson合并症指数、Gustillo类型和骨密度后,我们发现OUD患者在开放性下肢骨折后再入院的几率更高(调整OR为1.45[95%可信区间(CI) 1.0至2.0];P = 0.03)。OUD患者的90天感染发生率更高(调整后OR为1.96 [95% CI 1.0 ~ 3.8];P = 0.049),是两组再入院的主要原因。此外,11%(103例中有11例)的OUD患者因阿片类药物引起的并发症再次入院,这在本队列中是独家观察到的。OUD患者的住院时间也更长(调整后平均差2.2天[95% CI 0.5至3.8];p = 0.01)和更高的住院费用(调整后的平均差异为34,000美元[95% CI 1000至66,000];p = 0.04)和成本(调整后的平均差异为7000美元[95% CI 2000至13000];p = 0.007)。结论:这些研究结果表明,减轻OUD患者的感染、阿片类药物过量、成瘾和便秘可减少下肢骨折患者的再入院。未来的研究应侧重于抗生素和伤口护理依从性以及术后阿片类药物成瘾支持服务的早期和频繁参与。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Is Preoperative Opioid Use Associated With Readmissions and Outcomes in Lower Extremity Trauma?

Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) has been implicated as a potential risk factor for adverse outcomes and readmissions in various surgical procedures. Patients admitted with an open fracture of the lower extremity often have multifarious pain needs, require surgical procedures, and have prolonged rehabilitation; previous OUD complicates this process. Our goal was to describe at a national level how OUD is associated with readmission, complications, and healthcare expenditure for patients admitted with open lower extremity fractures.

Questions/purposes: (1) Do patients with OUD who were treated for open lower extremity fractures have higher odds of readmission compared with patients without OUD? (2) Do patients with OUD who were treated for open lower extremity fractures have higher healthcare utilization (specifically, length of stay and hospitalization charges and costs)?

Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, which is the largest nationally representative readmissions database in the United States. Patients were included if they had an ICD-10-CM principal diagnosis of open lower extremity fracture. Between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2019, a total of 17,811 patients were admitted for open lower extremity fractures and entered in the National Readmissions Database. Of the 17,811 patients, 2.3% (410) had a secondary diagnosis of OUD and 97.7% (17,401) did not. The mean age was 46 years for both groups. The most common operative procedure was debridement, and 1.5% of patients received a flap for reconstruction. Opioid disorders were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Ninety-day complications and readmissions were characterized for the calendar year. Patients undergoing flap-based reconstructions were identified with ICD-10-PR codes. Confounders (patient demographic and hospital characteristics) were adjusted for using multivariable regression analysis models.

Results: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as primary payer, Charlson comorbidity index, Gustillo type, and bone density, we found that patients with OUD had greater odds of readmission after open lower extremity fractures (adjusted OR 1.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.0]; p = 0.03). The 90-day infection occurrence was higher in patients with OUD (adjusted OR 1.96 [95% CI 1.0 to 3.8]; p = 0.049) and was the primary reason for readmission in both groups. Moreover, 11% (11 of 103) of patients with OUD were readmitted with opioid-induced complications, which was exclusively observed in this cohort. Patients with OUD also had longer hospital stays (adjusted mean difference 2.2 days [95% CI 0.5 to 3.8]; p = 0.01) and higher hospitalization charges (adjusted mean difference in USD 34,000 [95% CI 1000 to 66,000]; p = 0.04) and costs (adjusted mean difference in USD 7000 [95% CI 2000 to 13,000]; p = 0.007) than those without OUD.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that mitigating infection and opioid overdose, addiction, and constipation in patients with OUD could reduce readmissions in lower extremity fracture patients. Future research should focus on antibiotic and wound care compliance and the early and frequent engagement of postoperative opioid addiction support services.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信