针对有条件上市许可的肿瘤药物申请的常见缺陷。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sinan B. Sarac, Peter Kiely, Simona Stankeviciute, Jorge Camarero, Amy McKee
{"title":"针对有条件上市许可的肿瘤药物申请的常见缺陷。","authors":"Sinan B. Sarac,&nbsp;Peter Kiely,&nbsp;Simona Stankeviciute,&nbsp;Jorge Camarero,&nbsp;Amy McKee","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Early approval mechanisms, such as conditional approval in the EU, have been used extensively to provide timely access to therapeutic innovations to cancer patients with unmet medical needs.</p><p>While based on promising early evidence, such approvals are challenging from many perspectives due to the lack of comprehensive data. The limitation typically relates to data that demonstrates clinical benefit via early endpoints and is only acceptable when the early evidence is particularly convincing to assume that the benefits of early access are greater than the potential harms.</p><p>This paper describes the requirements for conditional approval and presents common pitfalls in oncology, such as misunderstandings about the strength of evidence from exploratory trials and secondary analyses, lack of planning and opportunities to improve communication. Thereafter, we present a framework (‘EDGE’) on how to improve the submission and evaluation of drug applications for conditional approval in the EU.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"91 3","pages":"672-677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16383","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common pitfalls in oncology drug applications aiming for conditional marketing authorization\",\"authors\":\"Sinan B. Sarac,&nbsp;Peter Kiely,&nbsp;Simona Stankeviciute,&nbsp;Jorge Camarero,&nbsp;Amy McKee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Early approval mechanisms, such as conditional approval in the EU, have been used extensively to provide timely access to therapeutic innovations to cancer patients with unmet medical needs.</p><p>While based on promising early evidence, such approvals are challenging from many perspectives due to the lack of comprehensive data. The limitation typically relates to data that demonstrates clinical benefit via early endpoints and is only acceptable when the early evidence is particularly convincing to assume that the benefits of early access are greater than the potential harms.</p><p>This paper describes the requirements for conditional approval and presents common pitfalls in oncology, such as misunderstandings about the strength of evidence from exploratory trials and secondary analyses, lack of planning and opportunities to improve communication. Thereafter, we present a framework (‘EDGE’) on how to improve the submission and evaluation of drug applications for conditional approval in the EU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"672-677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16383\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16383\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期批准机制,如欧盟的有条件批准,已被广泛用于向医疗需求未得到满足的癌症患者及时提供治疗创新。尽管基于有希望的早期证据,但由于缺乏全面的数据,从许多角度来看,此类批准具有挑战性。该限制通常与通过早期终点证明临床益处的数据有关,并且只有当早期证据特别令人信服地假设早期获得的益处大于潜在危害时才可接受。本文描述了有条件批准的要求,并提出了肿瘤学中常见的陷阱,例如对探索性试验和二次分析的证据强度的误解,缺乏计划和改善沟通的机会。此后,我们提出了一个关于如何改进欧盟有条件批准药物申请的提交和评估的框架(EDGE)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Common pitfalls in oncology drug applications aiming for conditional marketing authorization

Common pitfalls in oncology drug applications aiming for conditional marketing authorization

Early approval mechanisms, such as conditional approval in the EU, have been used extensively to provide timely access to therapeutic innovations to cancer patients with unmet medical needs.

While based on promising early evidence, such approvals are challenging from many perspectives due to the lack of comprehensive data. The limitation typically relates to data that demonstrates clinical benefit via early endpoints and is only acceptable when the early evidence is particularly convincing to assume that the benefits of early access are greater than the potential harms.

This paper describes the requirements for conditional approval and presents common pitfalls in oncology, such as misunderstandings about the strength of evidence from exploratory trials and secondary analyses, lack of planning and opportunities to improve communication. Thereafter, we present a framework (‘EDGE’) on how to improve the submission and evaluation of drug applications for conditional approval in the EU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信