EMA和FDA的癌症药物申请:新药和适应症延长在批准决定和审查时间方面的比较。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Allan Cramer, Freja Karuna Hemmingsen Sørup, Hanne Rolighed Christensen, Tonny Studsgaard Petersen, Kristian Karstoft
{"title":"EMA和FDA的癌症药物申请:新药和适应症延长在批准决定和审查时间方面的比较。","authors":"Allan Cramer, Freja Karuna Hemmingsen Sørup, Hanne Rolighed Christensen, Tonny Studsgaard Petersen, Kristian Karstoft","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the final approval decision and time from submission to final decision for new drug applications and applications for extension of indications to the EMA and the FDA within cancer drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis on antineoplastic drug applications with a final decision in both the EMA and the FDA from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. For each included drug application, we collected data from the EMA website and the Drugs@FDA database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 new drug applications and 94 applications for extension were included. Agreement in the final decision between the EMA and the FDA was found in 94% of new drug applications and 96% of applications for extension. For new drug applications, the time from submission to approval in the EMA and the FDA were median (interquartile range, IQR) 424 (394-481) days and 216 (169-243) days, respectively. For extensions, the median time from submission to approval in the EMA and the FDA were 295 (245-348) days and 176 (140-183) days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a high agreement in final approval decisions for cancer drug applications between the EMA and the FDA both for new drug applications and applications for extension. The time from submission to the final decision was markedly shorter in the FDA than in the EMA, albeit the difference was smaller for extensions than for new drug applications. The results indicate that the longer time from submission to decision in the EMA than in the FDA has limited influence on the final approval decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer drug applications to the EMA and the FDA: A comparison of new drugs and extension of indication in terms of approval decisions and time in review.\",\"authors\":\"Allan Cramer, Freja Karuna Hemmingsen Sørup, Hanne Rolighed Christensen, Tonny Studsgaard Petersen, Kristian Karstoft\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the final approval decision and time from submission to final decision for new drug applications and applications for extension of indications to the EMA and the FDA within cancer drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis on antineoplastic drug applications with a final decision in both the EMA and the FDA from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. For each included drug application, we collected data from the EMA website and the Drugs@FDA database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 new drug applications and 94 applications for extension were included. Agreement in the final decision between the EMA and the FDA was found in 94% of new drug applications and 96% of applications for extension. For new drug applications, the time from submission to approval in the EMA and the FDA were median (interquartile range, IQR) 424 (394-481) days and 216 (169-243) days, respectively. For extensions, the median time from submission to approval in the EMA and the FDA were 295 (245-348) days and 176 (140-183) days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a high agreement in final approval decisions for cancer drug applications between the EMA and the FDA both for new drug applications and applications for extension. The time from submission to the final decision was markedly shorter in the FDA than in the EMA, albeit the difference was smaller for extensions than for new drug applications. The results indicate that the longer time from submission to decision in the EMA than in the FDA has limited influence on the final approval decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较新药申请的最终批准决定和从提交到最终决定的时间,以及癌症药物向EMA和FDA扩展适应症的申请。方法:我们对2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在EMA和FDA获得最终批准的抗肿瘤药物申请进行了回顾性分析。对于每个纳入的药物申请,我们从EMA网站和Drugs@FDA数据库收集数据。结果:共纳入新药申请48份,延期申请94份。在94%的新药申请和96%的延期申请中,EMA和FDA在最终决定中达成了一致。对于新药申请,从提交到批准在EMA和FDA的时间中位数(四分位数范围,IQR)分别为424(394-481)天和216(169-243)天。对于延期,EMA和FDA从提交到批准的中位时间分别为295(245-348)天和176(140-183)天。结论:我们发现EMA和FDA对癌症药物申请的最终批准决定在新药申请和延期申请方面高度一致。FDA从提交到最终决定的时间明显短于EMA,尽管延期的差异小于新药申请。结果表明,EMA从提交到决定的时间比FDA长,对最终批准决定的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer drug applications to the EMA and the FDA: A comparison of new drugs and extension of indication in terms of approval decisions and time in review.

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the final approval decision and time from submission to final decision for new drug applications and applications for extension of indications to the EMA and the FDA within cancer drugs.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on antineoplastic drug applications with a final decision in both the EMA and the FDA from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022. For each included drug application, we collected data from the EMA website and the Drugs@FDA database.

Results: A total of 48 new drug applications and 94 applications for extension were included. Agreement in the final decision between the EMA and the FDA was found in 94% of new drug applications and 96% of applications for extension. For new drug applications, the time from submission to approval in the EMA and the FDA were median (interquartile range, IQR) 424 (394-481) days and 216 (169-243) days, respectively. For extensions, the median time from submission to approval in the EMA and the FDA were 295 (245-348) days and 176 (140-183) days, respectively.

Conclusions: We found a high agreement in final approval decisions for cancer drug applications between the EMA and the FDA both for new drug applications and applications for extension. The time from submission to the final decision was markedly shorter in the FDA than in the EMA, albeit the difference was smaller for extensions than for new drug applications. The results indicate that the longer time from submission to decision in the EMA than in the FDA has limited influence on the final approval decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信