{"title":"普通病房手术后患者生命体征的持续监测:述评。","authors":"Ashish K Khanna, Moritz Flick, Bernd Saugel","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most postoperative deaths occur on general wards, often linked to complications associated with untreated changes in vital signs. Monitoring in these units is typically intermittent checks each shift or maximally every 4-6 h, which misses prolonged periods of subtle changes in physiology that can herald a critical downstream event. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is therefore intuitively necessary for patient safety. The past five decades have seen monitoring systems evolve rapidly, and today entirely wireless, wearable, and portable continuous surveillance of vital signs is possible on general wards. Introduction of this technology has the potential to modify both the sensing (afferent) and response (efferent) limbs of monitoring, and will allow earlier detection of vital signs perturbations. But this comes with challenges, including but not limited to issues with connectivity, data handling, alarm fatigue, information overload, and lack of meaningful clinical interventions. Evidence from before and after studies and retrospective propensity-matched data suggests that continuous ward monitoring decreases the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, rapid response calls, and in some instances, mortality. This review summarises the history of general ward monitoring and describes future directions, including opportunities to implement these devices using artificial intelligence, pattern detection, and user-friendly interfaces. Pragmatic, well designed and appropriately powered trials, and real-world implementation data are necessary to make continuous monitoring standard practice at every hospital bed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous vital sign monitoring of patients recovering from surgery on general wards: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Ashish K Khanna, Moritz Flick, Bernd Saugel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most postoperative deaths occur on general wards, often linked to complications associated with untreated changes in vital signs. Monitoring in these units is typically intermittent checks each shift or maximally every 4-6 h, which misses prolonged periods of subtle changes in physiology that can herald a critical downstream event. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is therefore intuitively necessary for patient safety. The past five decades have seen monitoring systems evolve rapidly, and today entirely wireless, wearable, and portable continuous surveillance of vital signs is possible on general wards. Introduction of this technology has the potential to modify both the sensing (afferent) and response (efferent) limbs of monitoring, and will allow earlier detection of vital signs perturbations. But this comes with challenges, including but not limited to issues with connectivity, data handling, alarm fatigue, information overload, and lack of meaningful clinical interventions. Evidence from before and after studies and retrospective propensity-matched data suggests that continuous ward monitoring decreases the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, rapid response calls, and in some instances, mortality. This review summarises the history of general ward monitoring and describes future directions, including opportunities to implement these devices using artificial intelligence, pattern detection, and user-friendly interfaces. Pragmatic, well designed and appropriately powered trials, and real-world implementation data are necessary to make continuous monitoring standard practice at every hospital bed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuous vital sign monitoring of patients recovering from surgery on general wards: a narrative review.
Most postoperative deaths occur on general wards, often linked to complications associated with untreated changes in vital signs. Monitoring in these units is typically intermittent checks each shift or maximally every 4-6 h, which misses prolonged periods of subtle changes in physiology that can herald a critical downstream event. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is therefore intuitively necessary for patient safety. The past five decades have seen monitoring systems evolve rapidly, and today entirely wireless, wearable, and portable continuous surveillance of vital signs is possible on general wards. Introduction of this technology has the potential to modify both the sensing (afferent) and response (efferent) limbs of monitoring, and will allow earlier detection of vital signs perturbations. But this comes with challenges, including but not limited to issues with connectivity, data handling, alarm fatigue, information overload, and lack of meaningful clinical interventions. Evidence from before and after studies and retrospective propensity-matched data suggests that continuous ward monitoring decreases the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, rapid response calls, and in some instances, mortality. This review summarises the history of general ward monitoring and describes future directions, including opportunities to implement these devices using artificial intelligence, pattern detection, and user-friendly interfaces. Pragmatic, well designed and appropriately powered trials, and real-world implementation data are necessary to make continuous monitoring standard practice at every hospital bed.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.