腹主动脉瘤破裂急诊血管内修复术中通路止血的术后封闭技术:初步经验的技术笔记。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chen Xu, Guo-Xiong Xu, Lei Chen, Yi-Qi Jin
{"title":"腹主动脉瘤破裂急诊血管内修复术中通路止血的术后封闭技术:初步经验的技术笔记。","authors":"Chen Xu, Guo-Xiong Xu, Lei Chen, Yi-Qi Jin","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03952-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the downsizing post-closure technique for access hemostasis during emergency endovascular repair (EVAR) in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cohort of eight patients underwent emergency EVAR through 16 femoral access sites for infrarenal RAAA. The downsizing post-closure technique, which involves a reduction in the size of the large-bore access by advancing a 10F sheath, was consistently applied. Technical success was defined as complete hemostasis without a bailout intervention. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of access-related complications. Secondary outcome measures included manual compression time, hemostasis time, hospital stay, additional use of Proglide, and the 30-day mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technique resulted in a 100% success rate (mean age: 69.5 ± 11.7 years; 75% males). The mean arterial sheath size was 18.1 ± 1.9F. The mean manual compression time was 3.6 ± 1.2 min, and the mean hemostasis time was 6.8 ± 1.4 min. No patients required additional use of Proglide, and no access-related complications were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The downsizing post-closure technique may offer an alternative for access hemostasis during emergency EVAR for RAAA. However, further evaluations through larger comparative studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"253-257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-closure Technique for Access Hemostasis During Emergency Endovascular Repair in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Technical Note on a Preliminary Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Chen Xu, Guo-Xiong Xu, Lei Chen, Yi-Qi Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00270-024-03952-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the downsizing post-closure technique for access hemostasis during emergency endovascular repair (EVAR) in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cohort of eight patients underwent emergency EVAR through 16 femoral access sites for infrarenal RAAA. The downsizing post-closure technique, which involves a reduction in the size of the large-bore access by advancing a 10F sheath, was consistently applied. Technical success was defined as complete hemostasis without a bailout intervention. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of access-related complications. Secondary outcome measures included manual compression time, hemostasis time, hospital stay, additional use of Proglide, and the 30-day mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technique resulted in a 100% success rate (mean age: 69.5 ± 11.7 years; 75% males). The mean arterial sheath size was 18.1 ± 1.9F. The mean manual compression time was 3.6 ± 1.2 min, and the mean hemostasis time was 6.8 ± 1.4 min. No patients required additional use of Proglide, and no access-related complications were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The downsizing post-closure technique may offer an alternative for access hemostasis during emergency EVAR for RAAA. However, further evaluations through larger comparative studies are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"253-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03952-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03952-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨腹主动脉瘤破裂急诊血管内修复术(EVAR)中切口止血的缩径后缝合技术。材料和方法:8例患者通过16个股骨通道接受急诊EVAR治疗肾下RAAA。缩小封闭后的技术,包括通过推进10F护套来减小大井眼通道的尺寸,一直在应用。技术上的成功被定义为完全止血,无需紧急救助干预。主要结局指标为通路相关并发症的发生率。次要结局指标包括人工按压时间、止血时间、住院时间、Proglide的额外使用和30天死亡率。结果:手术成功率100%,平均年龄69.5±11.7岁;75%的男性)。动脉鞘平均尺寸为18.1±1.9F。平均手动按压时间为3.6±1.2 min,平均止血时间为6.8±1.4 min。无患者需要额外使用Proglide,无通路相关并发症。30天死亡率为12.5%。结论:缩小缝合后技术可作为RAAA急诊EVAR的一种止血方法。但是,需要通过更大规模的比较研究进行进一步评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-closure Technique for Access Hemostasis During Emergency Endovascular Repair in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Technical Note on a Preliminary Experience.

Purpose: To describe the downsizing post-closure technique for access hemostasis during emergency endovascular repair (EVAR) in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA).

Materials and methods: A cohort of eight patients underwent emergency EVAR through 16 femoral access sites for infrarenal RAAA. The downsizing post-closure technique, which involves a reduction in the size of the large-bore access by advancing a 10F sheath, was consistently applied. Technical success was defined as complete hemostasis without a bailout intervention. Primary outcome measure was the incidence of access-related complications. Secondary outcome measures included manual compression time, hemostasis time, hospital stay, additional use of Proglide, and the 30-day mortality rate.

Results: The technique resulted in a 100% success rate (mean age: 69.5 ± 11.7 years; 75% males). The mean arterial sheath size was 18.1 ± 1.9F. The mean manual compression time was 3.6 ± 1.2 min, and the mean hemostasis time was 6.8 ± 1.4 min. No patients required additional use of Proglide, and no access-related complications were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.5%.

Conclusions: The downsizing post-closure technique may offer an alternative for access hemostasis during emergency EVAR for RAAA. However, further evaluations through larger comparative studies are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信