超声内镜引导下经壁引流术外引流胰周液术后疗效观察。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jun Noda, Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Masatsugu Nagahama
{"title":"超声内镜引导下经壁引流术外引流胰周液术后疗效观察。","authors":"Jun Noda, Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Masatsugu Nagahama","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03593-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) is widely performed to treat postoperative peripancreatic fluid collection (POPFC). Recent reports on EUS-TD lack a consensus on stent selection. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of EUS-TD for POPFC using an external drainage-based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients with POPFC treated with EUS-TD using external drainage from October 2016 to July 2024. Technical success was defined as successful placement of the external drainage. Clinical success was defined as the reduction in fluid collection, as evidenced by follow-up computed tomography 1 week post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 14 patients. The median duration from surgery to endoscopic treatment was 13 (range: 11-26) days. The median procedural time was 26 (range: 13-35) min. The technical success rate was 100%, and 6 Fr endoscopic nasocystic drainage was performed in all patients. The clinical success rate was 100%, and no adverse events were observed. One patient experienced self-removal and required repuncture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-TD for POPFC with an external drainage-based approach is safe and effective, with a short procedure time. However, this was a retrospective study with a small sample size, suggesting that future prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for postoperative peripancreatic fluid collection with an external drainage-based approach.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Noda, Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Masatsugu Nagahama\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-025-03593-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) is widely performed to treat postoperative peripancreatic fluid collection (POPFC). Recent reports on EUS-TD lack a consensus on stent selection. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of EUS-TD for POPFC using an external drainage-based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients with POPFC treated with EUS-TD using external drainage from October 2016 to July 2024. Technical success was defined as successful placement of the external drainage. Clinical success was defined as the reduction in fluid collection, as evidenced by follow-up computed tomography 1 week post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 14 patients. The median duration from surgery to endoscopic treatment was 13 (range: 11-26) days. The median procedural time was 26 (range: 13-35) min. The technical success rate was 100%, and 6 Fr endoscopic nasocystic drainage was performed in all patients. The clinical success rate was 100%, and no adverse events were observed. One patient experienced self-removal and required repuncture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-TD for POPFC with an external drainage-based approach is safe and effective, with a short procedure time. However, this was a retrospective study with a small sample size, suggesting that future prospective studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03593-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03593-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声内镜引导下的经壁引流术(EUS-TD)被广泛用于治疗术后胰周积液(POPFC)。最近关于EUS-TD的报道在支架选择上缺乏共识。本研究旨在评估EUS-TD体外引流治疗POPFC的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2016年10月至2024年7月采用EUS-TD外引流治疗POPFC患者的病历。技术成功定义为成功放置外引流。临床成功定义为术后1周的随访计算机断层扫描证明液体收集减少。结果:本研究纳入14例患者。从手术到内镜治疗的中位持续时间为13天(范围:11-26天)。手术时间中位数为26分钟(范围13-35分钟),技术成功率100%,所有患者均行内镜下鼻囊引流6分钟。临床成功率100%,无不良反应发生。一名患者经历了自我切除并需要重新穿刺。结论:体外引流入路EUS-TD治疗POPFC安全有效,手术时间短。然而,这是一个小样本量的回顾性研究,表明未来的前瞻性研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage for postoperative peripancreatic fluid collection with an external drainage-based approach.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) is widely performed to treat postoperative peripancreatic fluid collection (POPFC). Recent reports on EUS-TD lack a consensus on stent selection. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of EUS-TD for POPFC using an external drainage-based approach.

Methods: We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients with POPFC treated with EUS-TD using external drainage from October 2016 to July 2024. Technical success was defined as successful placement of the external drainage. Clinical success was defined as the reduction in fluid collection, as evidenced by follow-up computed tomography 1 week post-procedure.

Results: This study included 14 patients. The median duration from surgery to endoscopic treatment was 13 (range: 11-26) days. The median procedural time was 26 (range: 13-35) min. The technical success rate was 100%, and 6 Fr endoscopic nasocystic drainage was performed in all patients. The clinical success rate was 100%, and no adverse events were observed. One patient experienced self-removal and required repuncture.

Conclusions: EUS-TD for POPFC with an external drainage-based approach is safe and effective, with a short procedure time. However, this was a retrospective study with a small sample size, suggesting that future prospective studies are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信