{"title":"电磁加射频治疗人体轮廓:综述。","authors":"Eric Swanson","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electromagnetic treatments have recently been combined with radiofrequency to reduce the fat layer and simultaneously increase muscle thickness. Studies report treatment efficacy, using photographs and imaging methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted. Measurement data were tabulated. The EmSculpt Neo device (BTL Industries, Boston, MA) was used in all studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies evaluated the fat thickness and muscle thickness using either ultrasound (1 study) or magnetic resonance imaging methods (6 studies). The abdomen was treated in 2 studies. The other studies treated the lateral thighs, flanks, buttocks, inner thighs, and upper arms. The mean reduction in fat thickness was 8.0 mm, and the mean increase in muscle thickness was 5.5 mm. All 7 studies were authored by BTL medical advisors. Measured changes were likely within the margin of error and of questionable clinical relevance. Few adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Photographs were frequently not standardized, showing changes in treated areas, but unexplained changes in nontreated areas as well. The magnetic resonance imaging scans were affected by differing levels of the axial slice. Measured changes were incremental and likely not indicative of a true treatment effect. The scientific basis for efficacy is tenuous, both for fat reduction and muscle hypertrophy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A scientific evaluation of the results fails to produce reliable evidence of a clinically meaningful result for this combination energy-based treatment. Financial conflict is a major factor. Liposuction remains the gold standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"250-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body Contouring With Electromagnetic Treatment Plus Radiofrequency: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Swanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electromagnetic treatments have recently been combined with radiofrequency to reduce the fat layer and simultaneously increase muscle thickness. Studies report treatment efficacy, using photographs and imaging methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted. Measurement data were tabulated. The EmSculpt Neo device (BTL Industries, Boston, MA) was used in all studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies evaluated the fat thickness and muscle thickness using either ultrasound (1 study) or magnetic resonance imaging methods (6 studies). The abdomen was treated in 2 studies. The other studies treated the lateral thighs, flanks, buttocks, inner thighs, and upper arms. The mean reduction in fat thickness was 8.0 mm, and the mean increase in muscle thickness was 5.5 mm. All 7 studies were authored by BTL medical advisors. Measured changes were likely within the margin of error and of questionable clinical relevance. Few adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Photographs were frequently not standardized, showing changes in treated areas, but unexplained changes in nontreated areas as well. The magnetic resonance imaging scans were affected by differing levels of the axial slice. Measured changes were incremental and likely not indicative of a true treatment effect. The scientific basis for efficacy is tenuous, both for fat reduction and muscle hypertrophy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A scientific evaluation of the results fails to produce reliable evidence of a clinically meaningful result for this combination energy-based treatment. Financial conflict is a major factor. Liposuction remains the gold standard.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"250-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Body Contouring With Electromagnetic Treatment Plus Radiofrequency: A Review.
Background: Electromagnetic treatments have recently been combined with radiofrequency to reduce the fat layer and simultaneously increase muscle thickness. Studies report treatment efficacy, using photographs and imaging methods.
Methods: A literature review was conducted. Measurement data were tabulated. The EmSculpt Neo device (BTL Industries, Boston, MA) was used in all studies.
Results: Seven studies evaluated the fat thickness and muscle thickness using either ultrasound (1 study) or magnetic resonance imaging methods (6 studies). The abdomen was treated in 2 studies. The other studies treated the lateral thighs, flanks, buttocks, inner thighs, and upper arms. The mean reduction in fat thickness was 8.0 mm, and the mean increase in muscle thickness was 5.5 mm. All 7 studies were authored by BTL medical advisors. Measured changes were likely within the margin of error and of questionable clinical relevance. Few adverse events were reported.
Discussion: Photographs were frequently not standardized, showing changes in treated areas, but unexplained changes in nontreated areas as well. The magnetic resonance imaging scans were affected by differing levels of the axial slice. Measured changes were incremental and likely not indicative of a true treatment effect. The scientific basis for efficacy is tenuous, both for fat reduction and muscle hypertrophy.
Conclusions: A scientific evaluation of the results fails to produce reliable evidence of a clinically meaningful result for this combination energy-based treatment. Financial conflict is a major factor. Liposuction remains the gold standard.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.